Autorrevelación docente: una revisión de la literatura.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.v23.i1.11383Palabras clave:
Revisión de literatura, Autorrevelación docente, Comportamiento del docente, Relación profesor-alumno, Proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje.Resumen
Para maximizar el aprendizaje de los estudiantes, los docentes exhiben intencionalmente determinados comportamientos para construir relaciones interpersonales con el alumnado. Una de las conductas que los docentes incorporan en su docencia para clarificar y mejorar la comprensión de los estudiantes sobre el contenido del curso es la autorrevelación. Sin embargo, cuando se emplea de forma inadecuada, ésta puede perjudicar las oportunidades de aprendizaje de los estudiantes. Así, el objetivo del presente estudio consistió en establecer el estado de la cuestión sobre la autorrevelación docente a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura existente, determinando su impacto en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda bibliográfica en diferentes bases de datos nacionales e internacionales, seleccionándose para la revisión un total de 39 artículos científicos, publicados entre 1982 y 2019, que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión establecidos. En relación al impacto de la autorrevelación docente en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje, se identificaron 6 categorías: aprendizaje cognitivo, aprendizaje afectivo, motivación académica, participación e interés, comunicación profesor-alumno fuera del aula y percepciones y evaluaciones sobre el docente, incluyéndose en cada una de ellas las principales aportaciones de los estudios incluidos en el análisis. A partir de los resultados obtenidos, se destaca la necesidad de que, para que favorezca el aprendizaje de los estudiantes, las autorrevelaciones de los docentes deben ser moderadas, relevantes y positivas.
Abstract
To maximize student learning, teachers intentionally exhibit certain behaviors to build interpersonal relationships with students. One of the behaviors that teachers incorporate in their teaching to clarify and improve students’ understanding of the course content is self-disclosure. However, when it is used inappropriately, it may damage student learning opportunities. Thus, the purpose of this research was to establish the state of the art on teacher self-disclosure through a systematic review of the existing literature, establishing itseffect on the teaching-learning process. A bibliographic search was carried out in different national and international databases, selecting 39 scientific articles for the revision, published between 1982 and 2019, that met the established inclusion criteria. Regarding the effect of teacher self-disclosure on the teaching-learning process, 6 categories weredetermined: cognitive learning, affective learning, academic motivation, participation and interest, teacher-student out-of-class communication and perceptions and evaluations of the teacher, including in each of them the main results of the articles included in the analysis. Based on the obtained results, it is highlighted the need that, in order to promote student learning, teacher self-disclosure must be moderate, relevant and positive.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Aubry, J. (2013). Facebook-Induced Motivation Shifts in a French Online Course. TechTrends, 57(6), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0705-6
Baker, J. P., Clark-Gordon, C. V. y Myers, S. A. (2019). Using emotional response theory to examine dramatic teaching behaviors and student approach–avoidance behaviors. Communication Education, 68(2), 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1212912
Baker, J. P. y Goodboy, A. K. (2018). Students’ self-determination as a consequence of instructor misbehaviors. Communication Research Reports, 35(1), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1366305
Baker, J. P. y Goodboy, A. K. (2019). The choice is yours: the effects of autonomy-supportive instruction on students’ learning and communication. Communication Education, 68(1), 80-102.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1536793
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Borzea, D. y Goodboy, A. K. (2016). When instructors self-disclose but misbehave: Conditional effects on student engagement and interest. Communication Studies, 67(5), 548-566.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1212912
Braun, V. y Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brophy, J. (1986). Socializing students´ motivation to learn. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University Press.
Buskist, W. y Saville, B. (2004). Rapport-building: Creating positive emotional contexts for enhancing teaching and learning. En B. Perlman, L. I. McCann y S. H. McFadden’s (Eds.), Lessons learned: Practical advice for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 149-155). Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.
Cayanus, J. L. (2004). Effective Instructional Practice: Using Teacher Self-Disclosure as an Instructional Tool. Communication Teacher, 18(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740462032000142095
Cayanus, J. L. y Martin, M. M. (2004). An instructor self-disclosure scale. Communication Research Reports, 21(3), 252-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409359987
Cayanus, J. L. y Martin, M. M. (2008). Teacher self-disclosure: Amount, relevance, and negativity. Communication Quarterly, 56(3), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370802241492
Cayanus, J. y Martin, M. M. (2016). Teacher Self-Disclosure. En P. L. Witt (Ed.), Communication and Learning (pp. 241-258). Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502446-011
Cayanus, J. L., Martin, M. M. y Goodboy, A. K. (2009). The relation between teacher self-disclosure and student motives to communicate. Communication Research Reports, 26(2), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090902861523
Cayanus, J. L., Martin, M. M. y Myers, S. A. (2008). The relationship between perceived instructor self-disclosure and college student information seeking. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33(1), 20-27.
Clark-Gordon, C. V. y Goodboy, A. K. (2019). Instructor Self-Disclosure and Third-Party Generated Warrants: Student Perceptions of Professor Social Media Use. Western Journal of Communication, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1649453
Coffelt, T. A., Strayhorn, J. y Tillson, L. D. (2014). Perceptions of Teachers’ Disclosures on Facebook and their Impact on Credibility. Kentucky Journal of Communication, 33(2), 25-43.
Cooper, P. J. y Simonds, C. (1999). Communication for the classroom teacher. Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn Bacon.
Cozby, P. C. (1973). Self-disclosure: a literature review. Psychological Review, 79(2), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033950
Dalto, C. A., Ajzen, I. y Kaplan, K. J. (1979). Self-disclosure and attraction: Effects of intimacy and desirability on beliefs and attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 13(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(79)90025-4
Daly, J. A. y Vangelisti, A. L. (2003). Skillfully instructing learners: How communicators effectively convey messages. En J. O. Greene y B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 871-908). New York: Routledge.
DeGroot, J. M., Young, V. J. y VanSlette, S. H. (2015). Twitter use and its Effects on Student perception of Instructor Credibility. Communication Education, 64(4), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1014386
Deiro, J. (2005). Teachers do make a difference: The teacher’s guide to connecting with students. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
DiVerniero, R. A. y Hosek, A. M. (2011). Students’ Perceptions and Communicative Management of Instructors' Online Self–Disclosure. Communication Quarterly, 59(4), 428-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.597275
Downs, V. C., Javidi, M. y Nussbaum, J. F. (1988). An analysis of teacher’s verbal communication within the college classroom: Use of humor, self-disclosure, and narratives. Communication Education, 37(2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378710
Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Shaver, C. y Oaks, M. (2009). Computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on ratemyprofessors.com: Expectancy effects on student cognitive and behavioral learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 368-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01445.x
Farani, S. T. y Fatemi, A. H. (2014). The Impact of Teacher's Self-disclosure on Students' Attitude towards Language Learning in a Foreign Language Context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), 2415-2422. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.11.2415-2422
Frisby, B. N. y Sidelinger, R. J. (2013). Violating student expectations: Student disclosures and student reactions in the college classroom. Communication Studies, 64, 241-258.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.755636
Frymier, A. B., Goldman, Z. W. y Claus, C. J. (2019). Why nonverbal immediacy matters: A motivation explanation. Communication Quarterly, 67(5), 526-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2019.1668442
Frymier, A. B. y Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49(3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379209
Fusani, D. S. (1994). ‘‘Extra-class’’ communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside of the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22(3), 232-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889409365400
Gnanaselvam, P. y Kepol, N. (2018). Perceived Teachers' Self-disclosure, Writing Performance and Gender of Malaysian ESL Undergraduates. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(4), 2195-2210.
Goldstein, G. S. y Benassi, V. A. (1994). The relation between teacher self-disclosure and student classroom participation. Teaching of Psychology, 21(4), 212-216. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2104_2
Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S. y Baker, J. P. (2018). Instructor misbehaviors impede students’ cognitive learning: testing the causal assumption. Communication Education, 67(3), 308-329.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1465192
Goodboy, A. K., Carton, S. T., Goldman, Z. W., Gozanski, T. A., Tyler, W. J. y Johnson, N. R. (2014). Discouraging instructional dissent and facilitating students' learning experiences through instructor self-disclosure. Southern Communication Journal, 79(2), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2013.865256
Gray, D. L., Anderman, E. M. y O´Connell, A. A. (2011). Associations of teacher credibility and teacher affinity with learning outcomes in health classrooms. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9143-x
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M. y Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
Hosek, A. M. y Presley, R. (2018). College Student Perceptions of The (In) Appropriateness and Functions of Teacher Disclosure. College Teaching, 66(2), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2017.1385587
Hosek, A. M. y Thompson, J. (2009). Communication Privacy Management and College Instruction: Exploring the Rules and Boundaries that Frame Instructor Private Disclosures. Communication Education, 58(3), 327-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520902777585
Imlawi, J. y Gregg, D. (2014). Engagement in online social networks: The impact of self-disclosure and humor. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(2), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.839901
Javidi, M. N. y Long, L. W. (1989). Teachers’ use of humor, self-disclosure, and narrative activity as a function of experience. Communication Research Reports, 6(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098909359831
Jebbour, M. (2018). University Students’ Perceptions of the Effects of Teacher Self-Disclosure in the English Language Classroom. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 3(3), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v3i3.166
Johnson, K. A. (2011). The effect of Twitter posts on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.534798
Kaufmann, R. M. y Lane, D. (2014). Examining communication privacy management in the middle school classroom: Perceived gains and consequences. Educational Research, 56(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.874145
Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hays, E. R. e Ivey, M. J. (1991). College teacher misbehaviors: What students don’t like about what teachers say or do. Communication Quarterly, 39(4), 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379109369808
Kelly, S., Romero, A., Morrow, J. A., Denton, Z. y Ducking, J. (2019). Instructor misbehaviors and math anxiety. Communication Reports, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1675737
Klebig, B., Goldonowicz, J., Mendes, E., Miller, A. N. y Katt, J. (2016). The Combined Effects of Instructor Communicative Behaviors, Instructor Credibility and Student Personality Traits on Incivility in the College Classroom. Communication Research Reports, 33(2), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1154837
Lannutti, P. J. y Strauman, E. C. (2006). Classroom communication: The influence of instructor self-disclosure on student evaluations. Communication Quarterly, 54(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500270496
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E. y Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on ‘‘Facebook’’: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009710
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E. y Simonds, C. J. (2009). The Effects of Teacher Self‐disclosure via Facebook on Teacher Credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923655
McBride, M. y Wahl, S. (2005). ‘To say or not to say:’ Teachers’ management of privacy boundaries in the classroom. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 30, 8-22.
McCarthy, P. R. y Schmeck, R. R. (1982). Effects of teacher self-disclosure on student learning and perceptions of teacher. College Student Journal, 16(1), 45-49.
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). An introduction to communication in the classroom. Edina, Minnesota: Burgess International.
McCroskey, J. C. y Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
McCroskey, J. C., Valencic, K. M. y Richmond, V. P. (2004). Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 197-210.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370192
Meluch, A., Feehan, K. y Starcher, S. (2019). Instructor Disclosures of Communication Apprehension and Student Perceptions of Instructor Credibility in the Public Speaking Classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(2), 299-309.
Mikulec, E. A. (2012). Professional Faces: Pre-service Secondary Teachers´ Awareness of Issues of Self-disclosure on Social-networking Sites. Current Issues in Education, 15(3), 1-16.
Miller, A. N., Katt, J. A., Brown, T. y Sivo, S. A. (2014). The relationship of instructor self-disclosure, nonverbal immediacy, and credibility to student incivility in the college classroom. Communication Education, 63(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.835054
Myers, S. A., Brann, M. y Members of Comm 600. (2009). College Students’ Perceptions of How Instructors Establish and Enhance Credibility Through Self-Disclosure. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 10(1), 9-16.
Nussbaum, J. F., Comadena, M. E. y Holladay, S. J. (1987). Classroom verbal behaviors of highly effective teachers. Journal of Thought, 22, 73-80.
Nussbaum, J. F. y Scott, M. D. (1979). Instructor communication behaviors and their relationship to classroom learning. Annals of the International Communication Association, 3(1), 561-583.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1979.11923783
Paluckaite, U. y Zardeckaite-Matulaitiene, K. (2015). The appropriateness of the relevant and irrelevant teacher’s self-disclosure: Students’ and their teachers’ attitudes. European Scientific Journal, 11, 18-35.
Pishghadam, R. y Askarzadeh, R. (2009). The impacts of teacher self-disclosure on the speaking ability of EFL learners. Iranian EFL Journal, 3, 37-46.
Rahimi, A. y Bigdeli, R. A. (2016). Iranian EFL Teachers' Perceptions of Teacher Self-Disclosure. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 83-96.
Rasmussen, B. M. y Mishna, F. (2008). A fine balance: Instructor self-disclosure in the classroom. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 28(1-2), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841230802179274
Sallinen-Kuparinen, A. (1992). Teacher communicator style. Communication Education, 41(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529209378877
Sarapin, S. H. y Morris, P. L. (2015). Faculty and Facebook friending: Instructor–student online social communication from the professor's perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.001
Saylag, R. (2013). Facebook as a Tool in Fostering EFL Teachers’ Establishment of Interpersonal Relations with Students Through Self-disclosure. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.329
Schrodt, P. (2013). Content relevance and students’ comfort with disclosure as moderators of instructor disclosures and credibility in the college classroom. Communication Education, 62(4), 352-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.807348
Sidelinger, R. J., Frisby, B. N., McMullen, A. L. y Heisler, J. (2012). Developing student-to-student connectedness: An examination of instructors’ humor, nonverbal immediacy, and self-disclosure in public speaking courses. Basic Communication Course Annual, 24, 81-121.
Sidelinger, R. J., Nyeste, M. C., Madlock, P. E., Pollak, J. y Wilkinson, J. (2015). Instructor privacy management in the classroom: Exploring instructors’ ineffective communication and student communication satisfaction. Communication Studies, 66(5), 569-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1034875
Singh, A., Gnanaselvam, P. y Suppiah, S. M. (2018). The relationship between perceived teachers’ self-disclosure and out-of-classroom communication among Malaysian undergraduates in a private institution of higher learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 14(1), 37-57.
Sleigh, M. J., Smith, A. W. y Laboe, J. (2013). Professors’ Facebook Content Affects Students' Perceptions and Expectations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(7), 489-496. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0561
Song, H., Kim, J. y Luo, W. (2016). Teacher-student relationships in online classes: A role of teacher self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 436-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.037
Song, H., Kim, J. y Park, N. (2019). I Know My Professor: Teacher Self-Disclosure in Online Education and a Mediating Role of Social Presence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(6), 448-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455126
Sorensen, G. (1989). The relationship among teachers’ self-disclosive statements, students’ perceptions, and affective learning. Communication Education, 38(3), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528909378762
Sumuer, E., Esfer, S. y Yildirim, S. (2014). Teachers’ Facebook use: their use habits, intensity, self-disclosure, privacy settings, and activities on Facebook. Educational Studies, 40(5), 537-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2014.952713
Trad, L., Baker, N., Blackman, H., Glynn, K., Wright, A. y Miller, A. N. (2012). Student Incivility and Instructor Communication in the College Classroom. Florida Communication Journal, 40(1), 47-53.
Violanti, M. T., Kelly, S. E., Garland, M. E. y Christen, S. (2018). Instructor clarity, humor, immediacy, and student learning: Replication and extension. Communication Studies, 69(3), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1466718
Waldeck, J. H. (2011). Teacher Self‐Disclosure. En W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp.1-3). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiect015.pub2
Wambach, C. y Brothen, T. (1997). Teacher self-disclosure and student classroom participation revisited. Teaching of Psychology, 24(4), 262-263. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2404_7
Wang, Z.; Novak, H.; Scofield-Snow, H.; Traylor, S. y Zhou, Y. (2015). Am I Disclosing Too Much? Student Perceptions of Teacher Credibility via Facebook. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 4(1), 5-37.
Webb, N. G. (2014). To Share or not to share: GTA self-disclosure in the college classroom. The Official Journal of the Georgia Communication Association, 83, 7-10.
Zardeckaite-Matulaitiene, K. y Paluckaite, U. (2013). The relation between teacher’s self-disclosure and student’s motivation to learn. European Scientific Journal, 9(28), 456-469. https://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2013.v9n28p%25p
Zhai, L. (2012). The influence of instructor self-disclosure on students’ evaluations: an intercultural comparison. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(3), 58-66.
Zhang, S. (2010). Secondary preservice teachers’ perspectives on teacher self-disclosure on citizenship curriculum. Action in Teacher Education, 32(2), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2010.10463552
Zhang, S., Shi, Q., Tonelson, S. y Robinson, J. (2009). Preservice and Inservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Appropriateness of Teacher Self-Disclosure. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1117-1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.011
Publicado
2021-01-31
Cómo citar
Peña Froment, F. A., García González, A. J., & Bohórquez Gómez-Millán, M. R. (2021). Autorrevelación docente: una revisión de la literatura. Revista Fuentes, 23(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.v23.i1.11383
Número
Sección
Investigaciones
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista Fuentes
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Revista Fuentes brinda acceso abierto inmediato a todo su contenido sobre el principio de que hacer que la investigación esté disponible de forma gratuita para el público para apoyar un mayor intercambio global del conocimiento.
De esta manera, el lector puede acceder a todos los contenidos de la revista desde el momento de la publicación sin coste ni obligación de suscripción.
Salvo indicación contraria, los artículos publicados en Revista Fuentes tienen licencia bajo el acuerdo de licencia internacional Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Los autores retienen los derechos de autor y se permite a terceros copiar, distribuir y hacer uso de los trabajos siempre que cumplan con los términos y condiciones establecidos por dicha licencia
- citar la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, deberá difundir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
Puede encontrar más información al respecto en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es.
En el caso de trabajos publicados bajo una licencia diferente a la anteriormente mencionada (CC BY-NC-ND o CC BY-NC) los autores retienen los derechos de autor, permitiéndose su copia, distribución y uso de los trabajos siempre que cumplan con los términos y condiciones de la licencia correspondiente. Puede encontrar más información al respecto en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=es.
Recibido 2020-03-04
Aceptado 2020-07-27
Publicado 2021-01-31
Aceptado 2020-07-27
Publicado 2021-01-31
Visualizaciones
- Resumen 595
- PDF 376
- HTML 75
- E-PUB 51
