Insights from Spanish Language and Linguistics Students on Theory-Practice Balance in Teacher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2024.25306Keywords:
Preservice teacher education, Teaching skills, Teaching profession, Career development, Professional training, Higher education, Education and employment, Educational sciencesAbstract
This study aims to explore the expectations and desires of students pursuing Education Sciences degrees regarding their studies. To meet this objective, and employing a mixed-methods approach with content analysis, the study examined the perspectives of a sample of 423 students enrolled in Primary Education, Early Childhood Education, and Pedagogy programs. Findings reveal a discrepancy between students' anticipated outcomes and the reality of their university education. While students expect primarily theoretical knowledge from their studies, they express a desire for more practical and professionally oriented training. In conclusion, these insights underscore the need for enhancements in teacher training programs to bridge the gap between academic learning and professional-world pedagogical demands. Addressing these gaps holds the potential to shape a more equitable and sustainable educational landscape for the future, fostering a student body that is more motivated and equipped with the required teaching competence. Further implications of this study are also discussed.
Downloads
References
Aguilera Jiménez, A. (2007). Una encuesta de preguntas abiertas para la revisión del curso. III Encuentro Sobre Docencia de La Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Sevilla.
Aguilera Jiménez, A. (2017). Un instrumento de preguntas abiertas para la revisión de la docencia universitaria. Revista Fuentes, 19(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2017.19.1.03
Alves, A. F., Gonçalves, P., & Almeida, L. (2012). Acesso e sucesso no ensino superior: inventariando as expectativas dos estudantes. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 20(1), 121–131.
Alzafari, K., & Kratzer, J. (2019). Challenges of implementing quality in European higher education: an expert perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 25(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1676963
Appova, A., & Taylor, C. E. (2020). Providing opportunities to develop prospective teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. TME, 17(2), 673–724.
Arias Ortiz, E., & Dehon, C. (2013). Roads to Success in the Belgian French Community’s Higher Education System: Predictors of Dropout and Degree Completion at the Université Libre de Bruxelles. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 693–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9290-y
Balloo, K. (2018). In-depth profiles of the expectations of undergraduate students commencing university: a Q methodological analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2251–2262. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1320373
Bécue Bertaut, M. (1991). Análisis estadístico de datos de encuestas. Tratamiento conexo de respuestas a preguntas abiertas y cerradas. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 37, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v37n0.1599
Bendermacher, G. W. G., Egbrink, M. G. A., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2017). Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review. Higher Education, 73, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9979-2
Berelson, B., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1948). The analysis of communication content. Universitetets studentkontor.
Blömeke, S. (2017). Modelling teachers’ professional competence as a multi-dimensional construct. In S. Guerreiro (Ed.), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession (p. 278). OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en
Brook, C., & Pedler, M. (2020). Action learning in academic management education: A state of the field review. International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100415
Campos, M., Peixoto, F., Bártolo-Ribeiro, R., & Almeida, L. S. (2022). Adapting as I Go: An Analysis of the Relationship between Academic Expectations, Self-Efficacy, and Adaptation to Higher Education. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100658
Cho, Y., & Egan, T. (2023). The changing landscape of action learning research and practice. Human Resource Development International, 26(4), 378–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2124584
Cruger, K. M. (2017). Applying challenge-based learning in the (feminist) communication classroom: Positioning students as knowledgeable change agents. Communication Teacher, 32(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2017.1372602
Csillag, S., & Hidegh, A. L. (2021). Lessons about action learning from undergraduate students in Budapest. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 18(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2020.1843402
de Souza Fleith, D., Assis Gomes, C. M., Marinho-Araújo, C. M., Luiz Rabelo, M., & Almeida, L. S. (2023). Academic Expectations, Gender and Working Status: Comparing Two Cohorts of University Students. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 39, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772E39304.en
De-Besa-Gutiérrez, M. R., & Gil-Flores, J. (2019). Academic expectations of non-traditional students at the beginning of university. Bordon. Revista de Pedagogia, 71(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2019.64506
European Commission. (2013a). Europe 2020 Target: Early Leavers from Education and Training. http://ec.europa.eu/education/more-information/doc/migrants/report_en.pdf
European Commission. (2013b). Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes. In European Commission, Education and Training. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgt077
European Commission. (2023). European Education Area Comparative report. https://doi.org/10.2766/810689
Ferrão, M. E., & Almeida, L. S. (2021). Persistence and academic expectations in higher-education students. Psicothema, 33(4), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.68
Figueiredo Motta, V., & Vasconcelos Ribeiro Galina, S. (2023). Experiential learning in entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review. In Teaching and Teacher Education (Vol. 121, p. 103919). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103919
Gleeson, J., Lynch, R., & McCormack, O. (2021). The European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) from the perspective of Irish teacher educators. European Educational Research Journal, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904120987101
Guerriero, S. (2017). Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge: What it is and how it functions. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en
Ibañez, R., & Villasana, P. (2020). Aproximación crítica al conocimiento didáctico del contenido en educación superior y sus posibilidades de estudio. Revista Espacios, 41(18), 21–29. https://www.readbag.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n18/a20v41n18p21.pdf
Jääskelä, P., Nykänen, S., & Tynjälä, P. (2018). Models for the development of generic skills in Finnish higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1206858
Jäger-Biela, D., Kaspar, K., & König, J. (2020). Lerngelegenheiten Zum Erwerb Von Digitalisierungsbezogenen Medienkompetenzen [Opportunities to Learn Digital Media Competences]. In K. Kaspar, M. Becker-Mrotzek, S. Hofhues, J. König, & D. Schmeinck (Eds.), Bildung, Schule, Digitalisierung [Education, School, Digitalisation] (pp. 62–72). Waxmann. https://www.waxmann.com/index.php?eID=download&buchnr=4246
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. In Prentice Hall, Inc. (Issue 1984). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50017-4
Loewenberg-Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
López-López, C., León-Guerrero, M. J., & Pérez-García, P. (2018). The Competency-Based Approach in the Spanish University Context . The Vision of the Teaching Staff. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(2), 529–545. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.2.314351 El
Lucas-Oliva, I., García-Jiménez, J., Torres-Gordillo, J. J., & Rodríguez-Santero, J. (2022). Equity and Parity in Primary Education: A Study on Performance in Language and Mathematics Using Hierarchical Linear Models. Sustainability, 14(19), 12404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912404
Lucas-Oliva, I., García-Jiménez, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J.-J. (2021). Teaching Competencies of Pre- Service Spanish Language Teachers through the ECO method. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(7), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.53333/IJICC2013/15746
Malva, L., Leijen, Ä., & Baucal, A. (2020). Towards measuring teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge – A mixed method investigation of a pilot test. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100815. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100815
Menéndez, D., & Naylor, S. (2019). Conceptualising routes to employability in higher education: the case of education studies. Journal of Education and Work, 32(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1649376
Messerer, L. A. S., Karst, K., & Janke, S. (2023). Choose wisely: intrinsic motivation for enrollment is associated with ongoing intrinsic learning motivation, study success and dropout. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2121814
Molero López-Barajas, D., & Ruiz Carrascosa, J. (2005). La evaluación de la docencia universitaria. Dimensiones y variables más relevantes. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 23(1), 57–84. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41570329
Mora Roche, J. (1994). Dificultades de Aprendizaje. Proyecto docente.
Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. In Interactive Learning Environments (Vol. 28, Issue 8, pp. 1064–1077). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Suhlmann, M., Sassenberg, K., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Belonging mediates effects of student-university fit on well-being, motivation, and dropout intention. Social Psychology, 49(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000325
Suleman, F. (2018). The employability skills of higher education graduates: insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options. Higher Education, 76, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0%0AThe
Trinidad, J. E., Raz, M. D., & Magsalin, I. M. (2021). “More than professional skills:” student perspectives on higher education’s purpose. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1891043
United Nation. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. https://doi.org/10.18356/2282dd98-en
van der Zanden, P. J. A. C., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Meijer, P. C. (2018). Domains and predictors of first-year student success: A systematic review. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 23, pp. 57–77). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.01.001
Wild, S., & Schulze Heuling, L. (2020). Student dropout and retention: An event history analysis among students in cooperative higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101687
Willis, J. (2021). Stepping up Social–Emotional Learning to Reignite All Brains. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 57(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2021.1851582
Wong, B., & Chiu, Y. L. T. (2021). Exploring the concept of ‘ideal’ university student. Studies in Higher Education, 46(3), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1643302
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Inés Lucas-Oliva, Irene Moreno-Medina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
Authors conserve the copyrights and cede to the journal the right for first publication, with the work registered with the attribution licence of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published work as long as they mention the authorship and the first publication in this journal.
The authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g. include it an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
Authors are allowed and indeed recommended to publish their work on the internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the revision and publication process, because it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
