Innovation in the science education is also a political and ideological issue. II: The evolution of the IRES Project

Authors

  • Gabriela Cattani Delord
  • Rafael Porlán
  • Gleny Duro Guiarães

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2018.i96.01

Keywords:

Innovation, Discourse analysis, Science education, IRES project, School research

Abstract

This article, the second of a series of two, completes the study of the innovative discourse of the IRES Project (Research and Renewal of the School). In the previous one, its origin and foundations were analyzed, especially in the field of science education, and in this the evolution is investigated throughout its 30 years of existence. The interviews with the founders and several reference documents have been taken as sources of information. The method of analysis has been based on the Discourse Analysis (AD) and the results show that the project, at this time, has not achieved the expected generalization. Its alternative ideology, highlighted in the first article, clashes with the neoliberal discourse, which has led its members to actively intervene in the social and political debate on the school model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno, T. (1973). The jargon of authenticity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Althusser, L. (1983). Aparelhos ideológicos de estado: nota sobre os aparelhos ideológicos de estado. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.

Anderson, G.L. & Grinberg, J. (1998). Educational administration as a disciplinary practice: appropriating Foucault's view of power, discourse, and method. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 329-353.

Apple, M.W. (2006). Ideología e poder. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1974) Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ball, S. J. (1987). The Micro-politics of the School: Towards a Theory of School Organization. Londres y Nueva York: Methuen.

Bacharach, S. B. & Mundell, B. L. (1993). Organizational politics in Schools: Micro, macro and Logic of Action. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 423-452.

Campbell, J. & Neill, S. (1994). Curriculum at stage one: Teacher commitment and policy failure. England: Longman.

Cuesta, R. (2004). La escolarización de masas: un sospechoso y “feliz” consenso transcultural. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 334, 125-131.

Delord, G.C., Porlán, R y Guimaraes, G. (en prensa). La innovación en la enseñanza de las ciencias también es una cuestión política e ideológica. I: La génesis y fundamentos del Proyecto IRES. Investigación en la Escuela.

Delors, J. (2003). Educação: um tesouro a descobrir. Brasilia: Edigfies Asa.

Dewey, J. (1995): Democracia y educación. Madrid: Morata.

Duarte, O. M. (2015). La enseñanza de la historia en la educación secundaria: innovación, cambio y continuidad (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla. Recuperado de https://idus.us.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11441/30778/1.%20TESIS%20DOCTORAL_Duarte%20Pi%C3%B1a_Olga%20M%C2%AA_16.07.2015.pdf?sequence=1

Freire, P. (1981). Pedagogía do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

Foucault, M. (2004). Microfísica do poder. (19 ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Edição Graal.

García Pérez, F.F., Porlán, R., Chica, M.J. y Gordillo, I. (2017). Por una ciudad educadora. Un programa educativo alternativo para la ciudad de Sevilla. En VIII Encuentro iberoamericano de colectivos y redes de maestros y maestras que hacen investigación desde su escuela y comunidad. Michoacán, México.

Grupo Investigación en la Escuela. (1991). Proyecto curricular IRES. Doc. I, II, III, IV. Sevilla: Díada.

Habermas, J. (1975). Connaissance et intérêt. Paris: Gallimard.

Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.

Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. New York: Row and Harper.

Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.

Merchán, J. (2012). La introducción en España de la política educativa basada en la gestión empresarial de la escuela: el caso de Andalucía. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 20(1), 1-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v20n32.2012

Pêcheux, M. (1995). Semântica e discurso: uma crítica à afirmação do óbvio. Campinas: Unicamp.

Porlán, R., Fernández, N., Chica, M., Estepa, J., García Pérez, F.F., Gordillo, I. y Torres, I. (2014). La escuela que queremos. En VII Encuentro iberoamericano de colectivos y redes de maestros y maestras que hacen investigación desde su escuela y comunidad. Cajamarca, Perú.

Saviani, D. (1994). Contribuições da filosofia para a educação. Em aberto, 45(9), 3-9.

Torres, J. (1991). El currículum oculto. Madrid: Morata.

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Delord, G. C., Porlán, R., & Duro Guiarães, G. (2018). Innovation in the science education is also a political and ideological issue. II: The evolution of the IRES Project . Investigaci´ón En La Escuela, (96), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2018.i96.01

Issue

Section

Miscelaneous
Received 2018-12-31
Accepted 2018-12-31
Published 2018-12-31
Views
  • Abstract 485
  • PDF (Español (España)) 112