El portafolio electrónico y el aprendizaje para la comprensión en secundaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2008.i64.05Abstract
El proyecto del que aquí se da cuenta es continuación de dos investigaciones: “School+ more tan a platform to build the school of tomorrow” (IST-2000-25162), financiada por la Unión Europea dentro de la convocatoria “School of Tomorrow” del V Programa Marco y del estudio “Aprendizaje para la comprensión en entornos virtuales en los centros de secundaria: la Red School+”, parcilamente financiado por el DURSI de la Generalitat de Cataluña, a través de la convocatoria ARIE 2004. La perspectiva común de estos estudios, así como del que aquí se presenta una parte de su proceso y resultados, es favorecer el aprendizaje para la comprensión y la dotación de sentido, vinculado a la utilización del e-portafolio como estrategia evaluadora de la comprensión y favorecedora de formas más complejas de aprendizaje.Downloads
References
AVRAAMINDOU, L. y ZEMBAL-SAUL (2004). Exploring the Influence of Web-Based Portfolio Development on Learning To Teach Elementary Science. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education I I (3): 415-442.
BARRET, H. & CARNEY, J. (2005). "Conflicting Paradigms and Competing Purposes in Electronic Porfolio Development". Bajado el 16 de septiembre de 2005 de: http://electronicportfolios.org/portfolios/LEAJournal-BarretCarney.pdf
BARRET, H. (2005). White Paper. Researching Portfolios and Learner Engagement. Bajado el 16 de septiembre de 2005 de: http://electronicportfolios.org/reflect/whitepaper.pdf
BELANOFF, P. y DICKSON, M. (Eds.) (1991). Portfolios. Process and Product. Poutsmouth: Heinemann. Bajado el 20 de septiembre de 2005 de: http://electronicportfolios.org/
BIRBILI, M. (2005). Constants and Contexts in Pupil Experience of Schooling in England, France and Denmark. European Educational Research Journal, 4, (3), 313-320.
CARNEY, J. (2001). Electronic and Traditional Paper Portfolios as Tools for Teacher
Knowledge Representation. Curriculum and Instruction. Seattle, University of Washington: 268.
CARNEY, J. (2002). The intimacies of electronic portfolio: Confronting preservice teachers' self-revelation dilemma. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education annual conference, Nashville.
CARNEY, J. (2003). Teacher Portfolio and New Technologies: Confronting the Decisions and Dilemmas. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education annual conference, Alburquerque.
CARNEY, J. (2004a). Setting an Agenda for Electronic Portfolio Research: A Framework for Evaluating Porfolo Literature. Presentació a I'AERA, abril 14, 2004. Bajado el 16 de septembre de 2005 de: http://it.wce.wwu.edu/carney/Presentations/AERA04/AERAresearchlit.pdf
CARNEY, J. (2004b). Campfires around which we tell our stories: Confronting the dilemmas of teacher portfolios and new technologies. Unpublished paper.
DELGADO, M. (1999). El animal público. Barcelona: Anagrama.
DENZIN, N. (1997). Ethnographic poetics and narratives of the self. Interpretative Ethnography. p. 207-208. London. Sage.
DERHAM, C. (2003). The digital portfolio assessment of teaching competencies. DPATCO: Initial development and validation, Unpublished dissertation. Lehigh University.
HARTMANN, C. (2003). Renditions of professional mathematics teaching: A study of
prospective mathematics teachers' growth through the creation of professional portfolios. Unpublished dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison: 147.
HERMAN, J. y WINTERS, L. (1994). Portfolio research: A Slim collection. Educational Leadership, 52, 48-55.
HERNÁNDEZ, F. (2 04). Pasión en el proceso de aprender. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 332, 46-51.
HERNÁNDEZ, F. (2005). La integración de los saberes en el marco de una educación para una cultura crítica. Cooperación educativa, 75-76, 29-35.
KALANTZIS, M. y COPE, B, et al. (2005). Learning by Design. Altona, Australia: Common Ground Publishing.
KEMMIS, S., ATKIN, R. y WRIGHT, E. (1977). How do Students Learn? Centre for Applied Research in Education. University of East Anglia: Occasional Publications no 5. Norwich.
LORENZO, G. e ITTELSON, J. (2005). An Over View of E-Portfolios. Comunicació presentada al Congrés de ALI (Educause Learning Initiative), July,
PAULSON, EL. & PAULSON, P. (1994). Assessing Portfolios Using the Constructivist Paradigm. A Fogarty, R. (ed.) (1996) Student Porfolios. Palatine:IRI Skylight Training & Publishing.
PAULSON, EL. & PAULSON, P. y MAYER, C. (1991). What makes a Portfolio a Porfolio? Educational Leadership, 58, (5), 60-63.
STIGGINS, R.J. (1994). Student-centered classroom assesment. New York: Merril.
TOSH, D. y WERDMULLER, B. (2004a). ePortfolios and weblogs: one vision for ePortfolio development. Bajado el 16 de setembre de 2005 de:
TOSH, D. y WERDMULLER, B. (2004b). Creation of a learning landscape: weblogging and social networking in the context of e-portfolios. Bajado el 16 de septiembre de 2005 de: http://www.eradc.prg/papers/Learning landscapg42.pdf
ZEICHNER, K. y WRAY, S. (2001). The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: What we know and What we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 613-621.
ZUBIZARRETA, J. (2004). The Learning Portfolio. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published work, provided that proper acknowledgement is given; the authorship of the work and first publication in AVANCES are mentioned; the material is not used for commercial purposes; and, if you create other material from the original material (e.g. a translation), you must distribute your contribution under this same licence as the original.
- Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2018-12-11
Published 2008-04-01
- Abstract 105
- PDF (Español (España)) 72