Numérisation de l'éducation des adultes et hyperbureaucratie

Auteurs

  • Licínio C. Lima Instituto de Educação da Universidade do Minho

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.12795/CP.2025.i34.v1.02

Mots-clés :

Éducation des adultes ; Gouvernance ; Plateformes numériques ; Bureaucratie ; Hyperbureaucratie ; Bureaucratie ; Hyperbureaucratie

Résumé

Cet essai problématise la numérisation de la gestion de l'éducation des adultes, qui englobe des éléments tels que l'apprentissage numérique, les applications technologiques pour l'enseignement et l'apprentissage, la gestion, l'évaluation, les plateformes électroniques de toutes sortes et les logiciels conçus pour faire entrer l'univers de l'éducation des adultes dans le monde numérique. En termes de gouvernance et de gestion, l'une des promesses de la numérisation est de réduire la bureaucratie. Les nouvelles organisations éducatives post-bureaucratiques offriraient plus de liberté, de flexibilité et de choix aux apprenants adultes. Cependant, ce scénario sera analysé sur la base d'une hypothèse de travail qui associe l'utilisation de machines numériques pour gouverner et organiser l'éducation des adultes à l'émergence de processus hautement rationalisés et formalisés, dans une interprétation basée sur la théorie wébérienne de la bureaucratie. Tout en admettant que la plateformisation de l'éducation des adultes recèle un potentiel démocratique, le texte se concentre sur les processus de domination numérique et d'autorité rationnelle-informative. La rationalité formelle a la capacité de produire des décisions algorithmiques, des formes de contrôle et de surveillance sans précédent, caractéristiques de ce que l'auteur appelle l'hyperbureaucratie. Le dilemme est que sans les processus de numérisation, nous ne pourrons guère progresser dans l'éducation des adultes comme dans d'autres domaines, mais avec eux, nous courons le risque de régresser en termes humains, démocratiques et émancipatoires.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Albrow, M. (1970). Bureaucracy. Macmillan.

Beetham, D. (1988). A burocracia. Editorial Estampa.

Catalão A. P., & Pires, C. A. (2020). As plataformas informáticas como instrumentos de regulação da organização e gestão escolar. Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Educacional, nº. especial, 85-110.

https://doi.org/10.34632/investigacaoeducacional.2020.8502

Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets and America’s schools. C. The Brookings Institution.

Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state. Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Sage.

Dellagnelo, E. L., & Machado-da-Silva, C. L. (2000). Novas formas organizacionais: onde se encontram as evidências empíricas de ruptura com o modelo burocrático de organização? Organizações & Sociedade, 7(19), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-92302000000300002

European Union (2020). Digital education action plan, 2021-2027. Resetting education and training for the digital age. European Commission.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/digital-education-action-plan-2021-2027.html

Farrell, C., & Morris, J. (2003). The neo-bureaucratic state: Professionals, managers and professional managers in schools, general practitioners and social work. Organizations, 10(1), 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508403010001380

Freire, P. (1967). Educação como prática da liberdade. Paz e Terra.

Freire, P. (1997). Política e educação (3.ª ed.). Cortez.

Gore, Al (Dir.) (1996). Da burocracia à eficácia. Reinventar a administração pública. Quetzal.

Gouldner, A. W. (1964). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. A case study of modern factory administration. The Free Press.

Graeber, D. (2015). The utopia of rules: On technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Melville House.

Grimaldi, E., & Ball, S. J. (2020). Paradoxes of freedom. An archaelogical analysis of educational online platforms interfaces. Critical Studies in Education, 62 (1), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1861043

Han, B.- C. (2015). Psicopolítica: neoliberalismo e novas técnicas de poder. Relógio D’Água.

Harris, M. (2001). Introducción a la antropología general. Alianza Editorial.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19. https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/PSPA108/4NMP%20all%20seasonsfulltext.pdf.

Kanger, T., & Kalenda, J. (2024). Platformisation and policy: towards digital governance of adult learning and education. In M. Milana, P. Rasmussen, & M. Bussi (Eds.), Research handbook on adult education policy (pp. 101-115). Edward Elgar.

Lane, J.- E. (2000). New public management. Routledge.

Lascoumes, P, & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments: From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x

Lima, L. C. (2012). Elementos de hiperburocratização da administração educacional. In C. Lucena, & J. R. Silva Júnior. (Orgs.), Trabalho e educação no século XXI: experiências internacionais (pp. 129-158). Xamã.

Lima, L. C., Sá, V., & Silva, G. (2020). A centralidade do (a) diretor(a) e as suas representações sobre o governo das escolas (pp. 19-69). In L. C. Lima, V. Sá, & L. L. Torres, L. L. (Orgs.), Diretores escolares em ação. Fundação Manuel Leão.

Milana, M., Brandi, U., Hodge, S., & Hoggan-Kloubert, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI), conversational agents, and generative AI: implications for adult education practice and research. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 43(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2310448

Mouzelis, N. P. (1975). Organisation and bureaucracy. An analysis of modern theories. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

OECD (2024). Recommendation of the council on artificial intelligence. OECD/LEGAL/0449.

https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Plume.

Perrota, C., & Pangrazio, L. (2023). The critical study of digital platforms and infrastructures: current issues and new agendas for education technology research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(131), 1-20. https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/7952

Pollitt, Ch., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform. Oxford University Press.

Ranson, S. (2016). Contesting the school reform in England: Contrasting modes of governance and accountability. Profesorado, 20(3), 53-85.

https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/18548

Salamon, L. M. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 1-47). Oxford University Press.

Saura, G., Peroni, V., Pires, D., & Lima, P. (2024). Capitalismo na era digital: democracia, Estado e ideología. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 63, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle63.09

Schmoelz, A. (2023). Digital humanism, progressive neoliberalism and the European digital governance system for vocational and adult education. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 29(2), 735-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714231161449

Selwyn, N. (2011). It’s all about standardisation. Exploring the digital (re)configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.625003

Smyth, J. (2011). The disaster of the “self-managing school” – genesis, trajectory, undisclosed agenda, and effects. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43(2), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2011.560253

Smythe, S. (2018). Adult learning in the control society: digital era governance, literacies of control, and the work of adult educators. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(3), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713618766645

Storey, V. A., & Wagner, A. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into adult education: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Adult Education and Technology, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAET.345921

UNESCO (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994

Verger, A., & Normand, R. (2015). Nueva gestión pública y educación: elementos teóricos y conceptuales para el estudio de un modelo de reforma educativa global. Educação & Sociedade, 36(132), 599-622. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES0101-73302015152799

Weber, M. (1964). Economía y sociedad: esbozo de sociología comprensiva. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Weber, M. (1983). A ética protestante e o espírito do capitalismo. Presença.

Williamson, B. (2016). Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.

Publiée

2025-06-30

Comment citer

Lima, L. C. (2025). Numérisation de l’éducation des adultes et hyperbureaucratie. Cuestiones Pedagógicas. Revista De Ciencias De La Educación, 1(34), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.12795/CP.2025.i34.v1.02