Validation of a Pedagogical Innovation Strategy for the Strengthening of Metacognitive Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2024.23433Palabras clave:
innovación educacional, competencia, evaluación, aprendizaje activo, estudiantes universitarios, entorno virtual, pandemia COVID-19, confinamientoResumen
Different researchers have designed strategies for strengthening metacognitive skills, generally for specific areas of knowledge. The goal of this research was to validate a pedagogical innovation strategy to strengthen metacognitive skills in university students and determine their perception of the same. Three competencies were appointed: self-recognition, self-planning, and self-management of knowledge. The strategy considered three moments: I recognize myself; analysis of the students’ metacognitive skills, I strengthen myself; study strategy planning and I project myself; monitoring and adjustment. A quantitative methodology was used with a pre-experimental design with pre-test and post-test with three different groups. Seventy-five students from 3 universities in Colombia were involved, one public university and two private who were taking part in three different courses, one virtual and two in distance mode within the framework of the health emergency generated by COVID-19. The competencies were assessed through the Schraw & Dennison (1994) Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) as a pre-test and post-test and were analyzed through a related-sample T-test. The perception was determined by a survey. It was evidenced that students strengthened the three metacognitive skills after the strategy implementation, the significance tests show this to be true. More than 95% of students pointed out that the strategy was effective and that favored the understanding of their learning processes, the organization of their study methods and the constant self-evaluation on the strengthing of their skills. It is suggested that the strategy is used in new learning environments to continue evaluating its effectiveness.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Alegría V. R., & Rivera M, J. (2021). Metacognición y competencias en la carrera de arquitectura de una universidad privada de Lima, Perú. [Metacognition and competenciesin the architecture career of aprivate university in lima-peru] Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Chakiñan, 13, 55-71. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.13.03
Arias, W.L, Zegarra, J., & Justo., O. (2014). Estilos de aprendizaje y metacognición en estudiantes de psicología de Arequipa [Learning and metacognition styles in psychology students from Arequipa]. Liberabit. Revista Peruana de Psicología, 20(2), 267-279. https://bit.ly/3UsEfvP
Aripin, N., & Rahmat, N. H. (2020). Metacognitive Writing Strategies Model Used by ESL Writers in the Writing Process: A Study Across Gender. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2021.111.1.9
Azevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition Learning 15, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x
Barandica Sabalza, E. E. (2023). Estrategias metacognitivas y pensamiento crítico en el aprendizaje del inglés: una revisión sistemática en las bases de Scopus, Dialnet y Redalyc. [Metacognitive strategies and critical thinking in efl learning: a systematic review based in Scopus, Dialnet and Redalyc] Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(2), 857-876. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.5371
Barría, V, Martínez, R, & Robledo, H. (2022). Estilos de aprendizaje y metacognición en la Práctica Profesional. [Learning styles and metacognition in the Professional Practice of students]. Praxis & Saber, 13(35), e14460. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v13.n35.2022.14460
Bono, A., Boatto, E., Aguilera, S., & Fenoglio, C. (2018). Tareas de clase de gestión metacognitiva. Una propuesta de intervención pedagógica en el aula universitaria [Metacognitive-oriented assignments. [A proposal for pedagogic intervention in the university classroom]. Innovación educativa, 18(78), 143-170. https://bit.ly/3Skh2Js
Brooke, R., & Debra, Z. (2022) Teaching Conceptual Models: Using Direct Instruction To Enhance Metacognition. Marketing Education Review, 32(4), 311-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2022.2059686
Campo, K., Escorcia, D., Moreno, M., & Palacio., J. (2016). Metacognición, escritura y rendimiento académico en universitarios de Colombia y Francia [Metacognition, writing and academic performance in colombian and french college students]. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 32(2), 233-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.12804/apl34.2.2016.03
Ceniceros, D., & Gutiérrez, D. (2009). Las habilidades metacognitivas en los estudiantes de la Universidad De Durango [The Metacognitive skills in the students of the pedagogical university of durango]. Psicogente, 12(21), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.17081/psico.12.21.1184
Chou P-N, Feng S-T. Using a Tablet Computer Application to Advance High School Students’ Laboratory Learning Experiences: A Focus on Electrical Engineering Education. Sustainability. 2019; 11(2):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020381
Chou, C. M., Shen, T. C., Shen, T. C., & Shen, C. H. (2023). The impact of CIE education integrated with the BIG 6 teaching strategy on students’ innovative motivation, creativity, metacognition, and self-perceived employability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, Article 101287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101287.
Costa, A. (1984). Mediating the Metacognitive. Educational Leadership, 42(3), 57-62. https://bit.ly/42pWjsb
Craig, K., Hale, D., Grainger, C. & Stewart. M.E. (2020). Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 155–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y
De la Portilla-Maya, S. R., Duque-Dussán, A. M., Landínez-Martínez, D. A., Montoya-Londoño, D. M. y Gutiérrez DeBlume, A. P. (2022). Pensamiento crítico y conciencia metacognitiva en una muestra de estudiantes de Medicina. [Critical thinking and metacognitive awareness in a sample of medical students]. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 18(1), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2022.18.1.8
Dennis, J. L., & Somerville, M. P. (2023). Supporting thinking about thinking: examining the metacognition theory-practice gap in higher education. Higher Education, 86(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00904-x
Desoete, A. (2008). Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: how you test is what you get. Metacognition and learning, 3, 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9026-0
Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. En L. B. Resnick (Ed.) The Nature of Intelligence. Erlbaum.
Gamboa Mora, M. C., López-Rodríguez, N. M., Vesga-Bravo, G. J., & Hernández-López, F. (2023). Metacognitive skills of undergraduate university students: study based on three colombian institutions. Psicogente, 26(50). https://doi.org/10.17081/psico.26.50.6162
García-Sanz, M. P. (2014). La evaluación de competencias en Educación Superior mediante rúbricas: un caso práctico. [Assessing competencies in higher education by rubrics: a case study]. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 17(1), 87-106. https://bit.ly/48dHSch
García, J., Tobón, S., & López, N. (2009). Currículo, didáctica y evaluación por competencias. Análisis desde el enfoque socioformativo [Curriculum, didactics and evaluation by competencies. Analysis from the socioformative approach]. Editorial UNIMET.
Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., Jackson, W. P., Caprino, A. M., Oswald, C., & McVea, M. (2015). Domain-specificity of self-regulated learning processing in science and history digital libraries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.001
Haller, E., Child, D., & Walberg, H. (1988). Can Comprehension Be Taught? A Quantitative Synthesis of "Metacognitive" Studies. Educational Researcher, 17(9), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175040
Hernandez-Sampieri y Mendoza (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. [Research methodology. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed routes] Macgraw Hill.
Hijarro-Vercher, A., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé López, V. (2023). Creatividad, metacognición y autoeficacia en la detección de errores en problemas resueltos. [Creativity, metacognition and self-efficacy in detecting errors in solved problems] Revista Fuentes, 25(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2023.23050
Huertas, A., Vesga, G., & Galindo, M. (2014). Validación del instrumento ‘Inventario de Habilidades Metacognitivas (MAI)’ con estudiantes colombianos. [Validation of the instrument ‘Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI)’with students in colombia]. Praxis & Saber, 5(10), 55 - 74. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.3022
Jaramillo, L.M., & Simbaña, V.P. (2014). La metacognición y su aplicación en herramientas virtuales desde la práctica docente. [Metacognition and its application in virtual tools from teaching practice]. Sophia, Colección de Filosofía de la Educación, 16, 299-313. https://bit.ly/491JdUM
Julio, J. N. (2021). Andamiaje metacognitivo en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje como estrategia para mejorar el rendimiento frente a logros de aprendizaje científico-tecnológicos y la autopercepción de habilidades metacognitivas en la ruralidad. [Metacognitive scaffolding in virtual learning environments as a strategy to improve performance in scientific-technological learning achievements and self-perception of metacognitive skills in rural areas. [Specialization thesis in information technologies applied to education, National Pedagogical University]. https://bit.ly/3HFD44l.
Karaoglan, F. G. (2022). The effect of learning analytics assisted recommendations and guidance feedback on students’ metacognitive awareness and academic achievements. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(2), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09304-z
Kleitman, S., & Narciss, S. (2019). Introduction to the special issue “applied metacognition: real-world applications beyond learning”. Metacognition and Learning, 14, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09214-7
Krebs, R., Rothstein, B., & Roelle, J. (2022). Rubrics enhance accuracy and reduce cognitive load in self-assessment. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 627-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09302-1
Largo Taborda, W. A., & Hurtado Vinasco, K. S. (2024). Fortalecimiento de la capacidad de autorregulación metacognitiva mediante el uso de la guía de interaprendizaje desde el cuidado del medio ambiente. [Strengthening the capacity for metacognitive self-regulation through the use of the interlearning guide for environmental care]. Praxis Pedagógica, 24(36), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto.praxis.24.36.2024.6–2
Lavrysh, Y, Leshchenko, M, Tymchuk, L. (2023). Development of Metacognitive Skills through Digital Narrativesin Higher Education. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 25, e07, 1-15. https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/5028
López, R., Tobón, S., Veytia, M. G., & Juárez, L. G. (2021). La mediación didáctica socioformativa en el aula que favorece la inclusión educativa. [Socio-formative didactic mediation in the classroom that favors educational inclusion]. Revista Fuentes, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.v23.i1.11203
Loureiro, P., & Gomes, M. J. (2023). Online peer assessment for learning: findings from higher education students. Education Sciences, 13(3), 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030253
Maturano, C., Soliveres, M., & Macías, A. (2002). Estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas en la comprensión de un texto de ciencias [Cognitive and metacognitive strategies in the comprehension of a science text] Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 20(3), 415-425. https://bit.ly/3Os1T7D
Mc Millan, J., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40-49. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/42jaNu3
Meneses, L., Salvador, F., & Ravelo, E. (2007). Descripción de los procesos cognitivos implicados en la escritura de un ensayo. [Description of the cognitive processes involved in writing an essay]. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 10(1), 83-98. https://bit.ly/3OlkpPe
Montoya, D. M., Orrego, M., Puente, A. y Tamayo, O. E. (2021). Los juicios metacognitivos como un campo emergente de investigación. Una revisión sistemática (2016-2020). [Metacognitive judgments as an emerging research field. A systematic review (2016-2020)]. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 17(1), 188-223. https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2021.17.1.10
Mora-Rosales, J. C., Ávila-Fray, D. X., & Gómez-Gaibor, A. S. (2023). Estrategias metacognitivas para aprendizajes significativos en el contexto universitario: una revisión sistemática. [Metacognitive strategies for significant learning in the university context: a systematic review]. Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria Arbitrada Yachasun 7(12 Ed. esp.), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.46296/yc.v7i12edespjun.0331
Moreno, J. Arbulú, C. Montenegro, L. (2022). La metacognición como factor de desarrollo de competencias en la educación peruana. [Metacognition for Skills Development in Peruvian Education]. Revista Educación, vol. 46, núm.1 pp. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v46i1.43724
Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman‟s cyclical modelof self-regulatedlearning. Anales de Psicología, 30(2), 450-462. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
Ríos, P. (1990). Relación entre Metacognición y Ejecución en Sujetos de Diferentes Edades. [Relationship between metacognition and performance in subjects of different ages]. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Central University of Venezuela. https://bit.ly/42nKXoB
Roa, H. (2016). Estrategias creativas y metacognitivas en el aprendizaje musical [Creative and metacognitive strategies in learning music]. Civilizar. Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 16 (30), 207-222. https://bit.ly/3upUn6p
Roldán, L., & Zabaleta, V. (2017). Desempeño y autopercepción en comprensión lectora en estudiantes universitarios [Performance and Self-Perception in Reading Comprehension among College Students]. Cuadernos de Investigación Educativa, 8(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.18861/cied.2017.8.1.2640
Salgado., A., García, L., & Méndez-Cadena, M.E. (2020). La experiencia del estudiantado mediante el uso del diario. ¿Una estrategia para la metacognición? [Student experience through journaling: a strategy for metacognition?] Revista Educación, 44(1),1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/REVEDU.V44I1.38291
Satrústegui, A., Quílez, A., Mateo, E., & Cortés-Pascual, A. (2024). Estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en materias STEM en Educación Secundaria. [Learning strategies and academic performance in STEM subjects in secondary education]. Revista Fuentes, 26(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2024.23324
Schellings, G., Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M., Veenman, M., & Meijer, J. (2013). Assessing metacognitive activities: the in-depth comparison of a task-specific questionnaire with think-aloud protocols. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 963–990 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0149-y
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology,19(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Solórzano-Restrepo, J., &López-Vargas, O. (2019). Efecto diferencial de un andamiaje metacognitivo en un ambiente e-learning sobre la carga cognitiva, el logro de aprendizaje y la habilidad metacognitiva [Differential effect of a metacognitive scaffolding in a e-Learning environment over cognitive load, learning achievement and metacognitive consciousness]. Suma Psicológica, 26(1), 37-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2019.v26.n1.5
Taghani, A., & Razavi, M. R. (2022). The effect of metacognitive skills training of study strategies on academic self-efficacy and academic engagement and performance of female students in Taybad. Current Psychology, 41(12), 8784-8792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01278-y
Tobón, S., y López, N. (2009). Estrategias metacognitivas. [Metacognitive strategies]. En García J y Tobón (Coord). Estrategias didácticas para la formación de competencias. A.R. Representaciones Generales S.R.L.
Tulving, E. (1969). Retrograde amnesia in free recall. Science, 164(3875), 88-90. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3875.88
Van Hout-Wolters, B.A. H. M. (2009). Measuring learning strategies. Kinds of measurement methods and their usefulness in educational research and practice. Pedagogische Studiën, 86(2), 110-129. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287836768
Veenman, M. V. J. (2013). International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies, (Vol. 28, 28th ed, 157-168.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3.
Virtanen, P., Nevgi, A., &; Niemi, H. (2014). Self-regulation in higher education: students’ motivational, regulational and learning strategies, and their relationships to study success. Studies for the Learning Society, 3, 20-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sls-2013-0004
Vuorre, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2021). Measures of relative metacognitive accuracy are confounded with task performance in tasks that permit guessing. Metacognition and Learning, 17, 269-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09257-1
Zapata-Zapata, A., & Vesga-Bravo, G. J. (2023). Habilidades metacognitivas en los procesos de aprendizaje en la educación superior: una revisión sistemática 2017-2022. [Metacognitive skills in learning processes in higher education: a systematic review 2017-2022] Psicología Unemi, 7(13), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol7iss13.2023pp73-93p
Zhao, L., Wang, S. & Su, YS (2024). Pre-service student teachers’ metacognition in an online learning community: An epistemic network analysis. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12439-4
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-40). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Descargas
Publicado
2024-09-12
Cómo citar
Vesga-Bravo, G. J., Gamboa-Mora, M. C., López-Rodríguez, N. M. ., Zapata-Zapata, A., & Hernández López, F. (2024). Validation of a Pedagogical Innovation Strategy for the Strengthening of Metacognitive Skills. Revista Fuentes, 26(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2024.23433
Número
Sección
Investigaciones
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Grace Judith Vesga Bravo, María Cristina Gamboa-Mora, Nelly Milady López-Rodríguez, Adiela Zapata-Zapata, Fernando Hernández López
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Revista Fuentes brinda acceso abierto inmediato a todo su contenido sobre el principio de que hacer que la investigación esté disponible de forma gratuita para el público para apoyar un mayor intercambio global del conocimiento.
De esta manera, el lector puede acceder a todos los contenidos de la revista desde el momento de la publicación sin coste ni obligación de suscripción.
Salvo indicación contraria, los artículos publicados en Revista Fuentes tienen licencia bajo el acuerdo de licencia internacional Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Los autores retienen los derechos de autor y se permite a terceros copiar, distribuir y hacer uso de los trabajos siempre que cumplan con los términos y condiciones establecidos por dicha licencia
- citar la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, deberá difundir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
Puede encontrar más información al respecto en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es.
En el caso de trabajos publicados bajo una licencia diferente a la anteriormente mencionada (CC BY-NC-ND o CC BY-NC) los autores retienen los derechos de autor, permitiéndose su copia, distribución y uso de los trabajos siempre que cumplan con los términos y condiciones de la licencia correspondiente. Puede encontrar más información al respecto en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=es.
Recibido 2023-03-29
Aceptado 2024-02-16
Publicado 2024-09-12
Aceptado 2024-02-16
Publicado 2024-09-12
Visualizaciones
- Resumen 131
- PDF (ENGLISH) 112
- HTML (ENGLISH) 12
- EPUB (ENGLISH) 10
