Hacia una perspectiva deliberativa en la construcción
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.1989.i08.02Abstract
El presente trabajo que es la continuación de un artículo anterior (Angulo, 1989), pretende analizar las dimensiones y las características de la liberación curricular, como una nueva perspectiva de construcción del currículum. Para ello, se analiza en primer lugar el pensamiento Schwab, para centrarse, posteriormente, en el pensamiento y la práctica de Stenhouse, a través del análisis pormenorizado del Proyecto Curricular de Humanidades propuesto por dicho autor, haciendo especial hincapié en sus consecuencias genéricas.
Downloads
References
ANGUL, J. F. (1988a). Análisis Epistemológico de la Racionalidad Científica en el Ámbito de la Didáctica. Tesis Doctoral. Dept. de Didáctica y Organización Escolar. Universidad de Málaga.
ANGULO, J. F. (1988b). La Estructura y los Intereses de la Tecnología de la: Un Análisis Crítico. Dept. de Dinámica y Organización Escolar. Universidad de Málaga.
ANGULO, J. F. (1989). Hacia una nueva racionalidad Educativa: La enseñanza como Práctica. no 7 p. 23-37.
APPEL, M. W. (1979). Ideology and Curriculum. R & P. London.
ARISTOTELES. Ética a Nicomaco. Biblioteca de Estudios Constitucionales. Madrid.
CARR, W. y KEMMIS, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Knowing Throught Action Research. London, The Falmer Press.
CLARK, Ch. Y YINGER, R. J. (1980). The Hidden World of Teaching: Implications of Research on Teacher Planning. (Research Series Nº 97). East Lansing: IRT, Michigan State University.
CONTRERAS DOMINGO, J. (1987). Memoria Departamento de Didáctica y Organización Escolar. Universidad de Málaga.
ELLIOTT, J. (1975). The Humanities Project on 'People and Work'and the Concept of Vocational Guidance, en ELLIOTT J y PRING, (Eds.) Social Education and Social Understanding. University of. London London, pp. 46-63.
ELLIOTT, J. (1976-77). Developing Hypotheses about Classroom from Teachers' Practical Constructs: An Account of the Work of the Ford Teaching Project, en KEMMIS, S. (1981) The Action Research Reader. Deakin University Press. Australia, pp. 293-311.
ELLIOTT, J. (1980). Implications of Classroom Research for Professional Development, en HOYLE, E., MEGARRRY, J. y ATKN, M. (Eds.) (1980) World Yearbook of Education. Professional Development of Teachers. Kogsan Page. London / Nichols Publi. Comp. N. Y., pp. 308-324.
ELLIOTT, J. (1981a). Teacher Evaluation and Teaching as a Moral Science. Multicopiado, Cambridge Institute of Education.
ELLIOTT, J. (1981b). Action-Research: A Framework for Self-Evaluation in Schools. School Council Programme 2. Interaction and the Quality of Learning Project. Cambridge Institute of Education. Working Paper Nº1.
ELLIOTT, J. (1983a). A Curriculum for the Study of Human Affairs: the Contribution of Lawerence Stenhouse. Journal of Curriculum Vol. 15, Nº2, pp. 105-123.
ELLIOTT, J. (1983b). Autoevaluación, Desarrollo Profesional y Responsabilidad, en GALTON Y MOON, B. (Eds.) (1986). Cambiar la Escuela, Cambiar el Curriculum. Martínez Roca, Barcelona.
ELLIOTT, J. (1984). Legitimation Crisis and the Growth of Educational Action-Research. Cambridge Institute of Education. Cambridge Institute of Education. Cambridge University. (Multicopiado).
ELLIOTT, J. (1986). El Profesor como Investigdor. International Encyclopaedia of Education. (Trad. J. F. Angulo. Dept. de Didáctica y Organización de Málaga). (Multicopiado).
ELLIOTT, J. y EBBUTT, D. (1983). Action Research into Teaching for understanding. A Guide to the Teacher-Pupil Interaction and the Quality of Learning. School Council Publications. Cambridge Institute of Education. Cambridge. (Multicopiado).
FOX, S. (1972). A Practical Imagen of «The Practical». Curriculum Theory Network, N º10, pp. 45-47.
GIROUX, H. A. (1980). Critical Theory and Rationality in Citizenship Education. Inquiry, Vol. 10, Nº4, pp. 229-366.
HABERMAS, J. (1963). Teoría y Praxis. Estudios de Filosofía social. Tecnos. Madrid, 1987.
HABERMAS, J. (1973). Problemas de Legitimación del Capitalismo tardío. Amorrortu, B.A., 1975.
HABERMAS, J. (1979). Some Aspects of the Rationality of Action, en GERAETZ, F. (ed.)(1979). Rationality Today. Ottawa, pp. 185-212.
HABERMAS, J. (1983). Conciencia Moral y Acción Comunicativa. Península, Barcelona, 1985.
KAMII, K. (1982). La Autonomía como Objetivo de la Educación: Implicaciones de la Teoría de Piaget. Infancia y Aprendizaje, pp. 18, 3-32.
KAMII, C. K. (1986). El niño Reinventa la Aritmética. Implicaciones de la Teoría de Piaget. Visor, Madrid.
PETERS, R. S. (1968). Must an Educator Have an Aim?, en MacMILLAN, J. y NELSON, I. (Eds.) (1968). Concepts of Teaching. Chicago, Rand McNally, pp. 89-98.
PETERS, R. S. (1973). Los Objetivos de la Educación: Investigación Conceptual, en PETERS, R.S.(Ed.) Filosofía de la Educación. F.C.E., México, 1977, pp. 25-110.
POPKEWITZ, Th. S. (1977). Los Valores Latentes del Curriculum Centrado en las Disciplinas, en GIMENO SACRISTAN, J. y PEREZ GOMEZ, L (Comps.) (1983) La Teoría y su práctica. Akal, Madrid, p. 306-321.
REID, W. A. (1978). Thinking about the Curriculum. The Nature and Treatment of Curriculum problems. R & K. P. London.
REID, W. A. (1979). Practical Reasoning and Curriculum Theory: In search of a New Paradigm. Curriculum Inquiry, Vol. 9 Nº 3, pp. 187-207.
REID, W. A. (1981). The Deliberative Approach to the Study Of the Curriculum and its Relation to Critical Pluralism, en Lawn, M L (Eds) (1981) Rethinking Curriculum Studies. A radical Approach. Croom Helm, London, pp. 10187.
REID, W. A. (1983). Curriculum Design Moral Judgment. Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 3, Nº 1, pp. 160-187.
SCHWAB, J. J. (1969). Un enfoque Práctico como Lengiaje para el Curriculo. El Ateneo, B. A., 1974.
SCHWAB, J. J. (1971). The Practical: Arts of Eclectic, en WESTBURY, I. y WILKOF, N. J. (eds.)(1978). Science, Curriculum and Liberal education: Selected Essays, Joseph J. Schwab. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 365-383.
SCHWAB, J. J. (1973). The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum, en WESTBURY, 1. y WILKOF, N.J. (Eds.) (1978) Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays, Joseph J. Schwab. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 365-383.
SCHWAB, J. J. (1983). The Practical 4: Something for Curriculum Professors to Do. Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 13, Nº 3, pp. 239-265.
STENHOUSE, L (1968). The Humanities Curriculum Project. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 1, Nº 1, pp. 26-33.
STENHOUSE, L. (1970). The Humanities Curriculum Project: An Introduction. The Schools Council/ Nuffield Foundation. Heineman Books, London.
STENHOUSE; L. (1971). The Humanities Curriculum Project: The Rationale. Theory into Practice. Vol. 10, Nº 3, pp. 154-162.
STENHOUSE, L. (1975). Defining the Curriculum Problem. Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 5, Nº2, pp. 104-108.
STENHOUSE, L. (1978). Applying Research to Education. Centre for Applied Research in Education. University of East Anglia. England. (Multicopiado).
STENHOUSE, L. (1980). Curriculum Research and the Art of the Teacher, en STENHOUSE, L (1983b) Authority, Education Emancipation. Heinemann Educational Books, London, pp. 155-162.
STENHOUSE, L. (1981). Investigación y Desarrollo del Curriculum. Morata, Madrid, 1984.
STENHOUSE, L. (1985). La Investigación como Base de la Enseñanza. Morata, Madrid, 1987.
STENHOUSE, L. (s.f.). The Teacher as Focus of Research and development. Multicopiado) C.A.R.E., University of East Anglia.
TOM, A. R. (1980). Teaching as a Moral Craft: A Metaphor for Teaching and Teacher Education. Curriculum Inquiry, Vol-3, Nº 10, pp. 315-323.
VAN MANEN, M. (1977). Linking ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical. Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 6, Nº 3, pp. 205-228.
WALKER, D. F. (1971). A Naturalistic Model for curriculum Development, en GRESS, J. R. y PURPEL, D. E. (1978) Curriculum: An Introduction to the Field: McCuthan, P. C. Berkeley, California.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Investigaci´ón en la Escuela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published work, provided that proper acknowledgement is given; the authorship of the work and first publication in AVANCES are mentioned; the material is not used for commercial purposes; and, if you create other material from the original material (e.g. a translation), you must distribute your contribution under this same licence as the original.
- Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2019-05-24
Published 2021-05-09
- Abstract 233
- PDF (Español (España)) 112
