Modelos de aprendizaje en la didáctica de las ciencias

Authors

  • Joan Aliberas
  • Rufina Gutierrez
  • Mercé Izquierdo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.1989.i09.02

Abstract

En este artículo se analizan los modelos psicológicos de aprendizaje más utilizados en la actual investigación en Didáctica de Ciencias, -los elaborados por Gagné, Ausubel, Piaget y la Psicología del Procesamiento de la Información-. Desde una perspectiva Toulmiana, se argumenta con la conveniencia de que los profesores no utilicen exclusivamente alguno de estos modelos, sino que se aconseja un uso racional de las aportaciones de cada uno de ellos, dependiendo de la situación didáctica.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALBERT, E. (1979). Can Ausubel's theory of meaningful learning become an alternative to piagetian psichology? Science Education, 63 (1), 135-138.

ANDERSON, J. R. (1981). Cognitive skills and their adquisition. Hillsdale, N. J., Erlbaum.

AUSUBEL, D. (1968). Psicología educativa. Un punto de vista Ed. Trillas, México.

BARNES, B. y CLAWSON, E. U. (1975). Do avance organizers facilitate learning? Recommendations for further research based on an analysis of 32 studies. Review of Educational Research, 45 (4), 637-659.

BENLLOCH, M. (1984). Por un aprendizaje constructivista de las ciencias. Ed. visor, Madrid.

CASE, R. (1980). Intellectual development and instruction: a neo-piagetian view. En LAWSON (1980).

CAWTHRON, E. R., y ROWELL, J. A. (1978). Epistemology and science education. Studies in Science Education, 5, 31-59.

COLL, C. (1986). Marc curricular per a Pensenyament obligatori. Departament d'Ensenyament de la Generalitat, Barcelona.

DRIVER, R. (1979). When is a stage not a stage? Educational Research, 21, 54-61.

DRIVER, R. (1982). Children's learning in Science. Educational Analysis, 4 (2), 69-79.

DRIVER, R. (1988). Un enfoque constructivista para el desarrollo del currículo de ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 6 (2), 109-120.

DRIVER, R. y EASLY, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: a review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.

GAGNE, R. M. y WHITE, R. T. (1978). Memory structures and learning outcomes. Rev. of Educational Research, 48 (2), 187-222.

GAGNE, R. M. (1962). The acquisition of Knowledge. Psicological Review, 69 (4), 355-365.

GAGNE, R. M. (1965). Las condiciones del aprendizaje. Ed. Aguilar, Madrid.

GILBERT,J. K. y WATTS, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science education, 10, 61-98.

GUTIERREZ, R. (1987). Psicología y aprendizaje de las ciencias: El modelo de Ausubel. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 5 (2), 118-128.

INHELDER, B. y PIAGET, J. (1955). De la lógica del niño a la lógica del adolescente. Ed, Paidós, Barcelona, 1985.

JOHNSTONE, A. H. (1984). New stars for the teacher to steer by? Journal of Chemical Education, 61 (10), 847_849.

JONES, H. L, y RUSSELL, J. M. (1979). Hierarchical learning paradigm. Journal or Research in Science teaching, 16 (6), 489-499.

KARPLUS, R. y al. (1977). Science teaching the development of reasoning. Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley.

LARKIN, J. y RAINARD, B. (1984). A research methodology fot studying how people think. Journal or Research in Science Teaching, 21 (3), 235-254.

LAWSON, A. E. (1980). The psychology thinking and creativity. Ed. ERIC, Columbus, Ohio.

LAWSON, A. E. (1982). The reality of general cognitive operative operations. Science Education, 66 (2), 229-241.

LIDSAY, P. H. y NORMAN, D. A. (1977). Procesamiento de informaci6n humana. Ed. Tecnos, Madrid.

LINN, M. C. (1987). Establishing a research base for science education: challenges, trends and recommendations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24 (3), 191-216.

MARRO, F. (1983). Aplicabilidad y repercusiones de la obra de Piaget en la práctica educativa. Infancia y aprendizaje, 23, 1-21.

MINSKY, M. (1988). The Society of Mind Ed. Picador- Haineman, London.

NORMAN, D. A. (1980). Twelve issues for cognitive science. Cognitive 4 (1), 1-32.

NOVAK, J. D. (1977). Teoría y práctica de edgcaci6n. Alianza editorial, Madrid, 1982.

NOVAK, J. D. (1988). Constructivismo humano: un consenso emergente. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 6 (3), 213-223.

OSBORNE, J. y WITTROCK, M. C. (1983). Leaning Science: a generative process. Science Education, 67 (4), 489-508.

OSBORNE, R. y WITTROCK, M. C. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59-87.

OTERO, (1985). El aprendizaje de los conceptos científicos en los niveles medio y superior. Revista de Educación, 278, 39-66.

PIAGET, J. (1970). La teoría de Jean Piaget. Infancia y aprendizaje, monografía 2, 13-54 (1981).

POZO, J. l. (1987). Aprendizaje de la ciencia y pensamiento causal. Ed. visor, Madrid.

SHAYER, M. y ADEY, P. (1981). La ciencia de ciencias. Ed. Narcea, Madrid (1984).

STEWART, J. H. (1985). Cognitive science and science education. European Journal of Science Education, 7 (1), 1-17.

STEWART, J. H. y ATKIN, J. A. (1982). Information processing psychology: a promising paradigm for research in science teaching. Journal of Research in Teaching, 19 (4), 321-332.

TOULMIN, S. (1972). La comprensión humana: l. El uso colectivo y la evolución de los conceptos. Alianza Universidad, Madrid, 1977.

DE VEGA, M. (1985). Nuevas perspectivas del procesamiento de la información. Estudios de Psicología, 22, 3-17.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09

How to Cite

Aliberas, J., Gutierrez, R., & Izquierdo, M. (2021). Modelos de aprendizaje en la didáctica de las ciencias. Investigaci´ón En La Escuela, (9), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.1989.i09.02

Issue

No. 9 (1989)

Section

Miscelaneous

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Investigaci´ón en la Escuela

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions: 

- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published work, provided that proper acknowledgement is given; the authorship of the work and first publication in AVANCES are mentioned; the material is not used for commercial purposes; and, if you create other material from the original material (e.g. a translation), you must distribute your contribution under this same licence as the original.

- Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.

- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).

Received 2019-05-14
Accepted 2019-05-14
Published 2021-05-09
Views
  • Abstract 742
  • PDF (Español (España)) 318