Case study and educational innovation: a necessary meeting for educational improvement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2021.i105.01Keywords:
innovation, case study, education, school improvement, education research, marketAbstract
Educational innovation, its meaning and its need is a complex task where its definition and its practice are determined by the approach adopted, by the meaning and purposes that we give to education. In an attempt to facilitate this task, two positions of (educational) innovation stand out. On one hand, a simplistic, narrow and mercantilist perspective that responds to the law of supply and demand. On another hand, critical, ethical, and equitable perspective; briefly, an innovation with a humanist vision. From this perspective, educational innovation refers to changes that educational practices undergo to meet the special and complex student's needs. These socio-cultural transformations lived by the students must be understood from the principles of justice and equity. Nevertheless, educational innovation is part also of the neoliberal and technocratic discourse, which it defines as replicable products and methods. Therefore, and after all that said, we understand educational innovation as a proposal based on research and, specifically, on case studies as a way of doing situated research. These offer the possibility to reach a comprehensive and deep knowledge of the particular educational problems. These offer the possibility to reach a comprehensive and deep knowledge of the particular educational problems, but without forgetting the common ones, to carry out an educational innovation: transforming, emancipating and professionalizing; contextual and original; communitarian and collaborative; processual, impacting and relevant; of quality and rigorous.
Downloads
References
Angulo, J. F., Betanzo, M. J., y López, M. (2005). Viviendo los contenidos: una experiencia en el uso de tecnologías móviles en los procesos de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje. Quaderns Digitals, 37. https://bit.ly/3sNh4OY
Bauman, Z. (1999). Modernidad Líquida. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: evidence‐based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
Campbell, D.T. y Stanley, J.C. (1995). Diseños Experimentales y Cuasi-experimentales en la Investigación Social. Amorrortu.
Canabal, C., García, M. y Margalef, L. (2018). La reflexión dialógica en la formación inicial del profesorado. Construyendo un marco conceptual. Perspectiva Educacional, 56(2), 28-50. https//doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.56-Iss.2-Art.496
Cañal, P. (1987). Un enfoque curricular basado en la investigación. Investigación en la Escuela, 1, 43-50. https://bit.ly/3dUkkjv
Elliot, J. (2001). Making evidence-based practice educational. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095735
Flick, U. (2014). La gestión de la calidad en investigación cualitativa. Morata.
García Gómez, R. J. (2006). Innovación, cultura y poder en las instituciones educativas. CIDE.
Giroux, H. A. (2013). La pedagogía crítica en tiempos oscuros. Praxis Educativa, 17(2), 13-26.
Hammersley, M. (2001). On 'Systematic' Reviews of Research Literatures: A 'narrative' response to Evans & Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 543-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095726
Hammersley, M. y Atkinson, P. (1994). Etnografía. Métodos de investigación. Paidós.
Harris, J. (2007). Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton University Press.
Iglesias Martínez, M. J., Lozano Cabezas, I., y Roldán Soler, I. (2018). La calidad e innovación educativa en la formación continua docente: un estudio cualitativo en dos centros educativos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 77(1), 13-34. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie7713090
Losada Iglesias, D., Correa Gorospe, J. M. y Fernández Olaskoaga, L. (2017). El impacto del modelo «un ordenador por niño» en la Educación Primaria: Un estudio de caso. Educación XX1, 20(1), 339-361, https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.11888
López-Gil, M. y Bernal Bravo, C. (2016). La cultura digital en la escuela pública. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 30(1),103-110. https://bit.ly/3eB7fuB
Martínez Bonafé, J. (2021, 13 de abril). A propósito del cambio curricular que propone Ministerio. El Diario de la Educación. https://bit.ly/3aL5l9s
Mills, A. J., Durepos, G. & Wiebe, E. (eds.) (2009). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (Vols. 1 y 2). SAGE Publications.
Oliver, M. & Conole, Gr. (2003). Evidence‐based practice and e‐learning in Higher Education: can we and should we? Research Papers in Education, 18(4), 385-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176873
Ragin, C. & Becker, H. (eds.) (1992). What is a Case: Exploring the Foundations of Social Enquiry. Cambridge University Press.
Rodríguez Martínez, C. y Vázquez Recio, R. (2002). Viaje a la escuela rural de Bolonia. En M. Muñoz-Repiso Izaguirre y F. Javier Murillo (Coords.), La mejora de la escuela: un cambio de mirada (pp. 263-289). Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deporte, Secretaría General Técnica/Octaedro.
Santos, B. S. (2009). Una epistemología del sur: la reinvención del conocimiento y la emancipación social. Siglo XXI Editores.
Santos, B. S. (2010). Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Ediciones Trilce.
Santos, B. S. (2019). Justicia entre Saberes. Epistemologías del Sur contra el epistemicidio. Morata.
Sego, K., Granados Romero, J. M., Lázaro, M., y Fernández-Larragueta, S. (2017). La formación del profesorado para un uso innovador de las TIC: un estudio de caso en la Educación Obligatoria en la provincia de Almería. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 21(4), 241-258. https://bit.ly/3gROYMa
Simons, H. (1996). El enfoque de estudio de casos en el proyecto sobre la enseñanza de ciencias, matemáticas y tecnología (SMTE) de la OCDE. Revista de Educación, 310, 173-185. https://bit.ly/3eCQVJR
Simons, H. (2011). El estudio de caso: teoría y práctica. Morata.
Stake, R. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Morata.
Stake, R. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press.
Stenhouse, L. (1978). Case Study and case records: toward a contemporary history of education. British Educational Research Journal, 4(2), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192780040202
Stenhouse, L. (1984). Investigación y desarrollo del currículum. Morata.
Stoecker, R. (1991). Evaluating and Rethinking the Case Study. The Sociological Review, 39(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1991.tb02970.x
Travers, M. (2006). Qualitative Research Through Case Studies. SAGE Publications.
Vázquez Recio, R. (2011). Enseñanza para la comprensión: El caso de la escuela rural de Bolonia (Cádiz, España). Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 52(1), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie570492
Vázquez Recio, R. y Angulo Rasco, J. F. (2003). Introducción a los estudios de casos: los primeros contactos con la investigación etnográfica. Ediciones Aljibe.
Walker, R. (1983). La realización de estudios de casos en educación. Ética, teoría y procedimientos. En W.B. Dockrell y D. Hamilton (comps.), Nuevas reflexiones sobre la investigación educativa (pp. 42-82). Narcea.
Walker, R. (1989). Métodos de Investigación para el Profesorado. Morata.
Williamson, B. (2019, 1 de febrero). Education for the robot economy. Code acts in education. https://bit.ly/3eAHs5U
Yin, R. K. (2004). The Case Study Anthology. SAGE Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods. SAGE Publications.
Zeichner, K. (1993). El maestro como profesional reflexivo. Cuadernos de pedagogía, 220, 44-49.
Zeichner, K. y Flessner, R. (2009). Educating teachers for critical education. En M. Apple, W. Au y L. Gandin, (eds.), The Routledge International handbook of critical education (pp. 296-311). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Investigaci´ón en la Escuela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published work, provided that proper acknowledgement is given; the authorship of the work and first publication in AVANCES are mentioned; the material is not used for commercial purposes; and, if you create other material from the original material (e.g. a translation), you must distribute your contribution under this same licence as the original.
- Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2021-12-20
Published 2021-12-31
- Abstract 1482
- PDF (Español (España)) 1820
