The affective dimension in students: the case of a socio-scientific research project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2020.i101.11Keywords:
Motivation, Interest, Social interaction, Affectivity, School research, Health, EnvironmentAbstract
This work describes a part of the socio-affective dimension, specifically, the value of homework in the development of collaborative work on socio-scientific issues addressed through school research in a science class. The initial sample considered is a classroom group of 28 seventh grade students. To characterize the socio-affective dimension of the group made up of the usefulness, interest and importance of the value of the task given by the students when dealing with the issues of biodiversity, air and water pollution, smoking, the social consequences of drugs, the effects of drugs on the human body and respiratory diseases, the MSLQ (Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire) was applied before and after an educational intervention, then a Category System was established to determine the state and level of development in the affective dimension and several of the seven subgroups established through an open interview were analyzed together to support the results obtained from the application of the questionnaire. The results show that the treatment of socio-scientific questions by school research allows students to maintain, self-regulate and increase interest and motivation, for which they use self-evaluation, social interaction and alternative spaces that generate desire for learning.Downloads
References
Acevedo, J., Vázquez, A., Martín, M., Oliva, J., Acevedo, P., Paixão, M. y Manassero, M. (2017). Naturaleza de la ciencia y educación científica para la participación ciudadana. Una revisión crítica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 2(2), 121-140.
Cañal, P. (2006). La alfabetización científica en la infancia. Aula de Infantil, 33, 5-9.
Cañal, P., Pozuelos, F.J. y Travé, G. (2005). Descripción general y fundamentos. Proyecto Curricular INM (6-12). Díada.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition. LEA.
Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Domènech, A.M. y Márquez, C. (2014). Which perspectives are referred in students’ arguments about a Socio-scientific Issue? The case of bears’ reintroduction in the Pyrenees. En C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien & A. Clément (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education: 9th ESERA Conference Selected Contributions. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6
Eccles, J. S. y Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
Eccles, J. S. y Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
España, E. y Prieto, T. (2009). Educar para la sostenibilidad: el contexto de los problemas sociocientíficos. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 6(3), 345-354. Recuperado de https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/eureka/article/view/3679/3272
Fowler, S. R. & Zeidler, D. L. (2016) Lack of Evolution Acceptanc Inhibits Students’ Negotiation of Biology-based Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Biological Education, 50(4),407-424.
Gidalevich, S. y Kramarski, B. (2018). The value of fixed versus faded self-regulatory scaffolds on fourth graders’ mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 47(1), 39-68. doi: 10.1007/s11251-018-9475-z
Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S. y Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk y J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 83-106). Routledge.
Heddy, B. C. y Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming Misconceptions: Using Transformative Experience to Promote Positive Affect and Conceptual Change in Students Learning About Biological Evolution. Science Education, 97(5), 723–744. doi: 10.1002/sce.21072
Hernández, M., Fernández, J. y Baptista R. (1991). Metodología de la investigación científica. Mc Graw Hill.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2010). 10 ideas clave. Competencias en argumentación y uso de pruebas. Graó.
Jiménez Vicioso, J. R. (2006). Un aula para la investigación. Diada Editora.
López-González, L. y Oriol, X. (2016) The relationship between emotional competence, classroom climate and school achievement in high school students. Culture and Education, 28(1), 130-156. doi: 10.1080/11356405.2015.1120448
Osborne, J., Simon, S. y Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079, doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
Palmer, D. (2005). A motivational view of constructivist informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853–1881. doi: 10.1080/09500690500339654
Panadero, E. y Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). ¿Cómo autorregulan nuestros alumnos? Revisión del modelo cíclico de Zimmerman sobre autorregulación del aprendizaje. Anales de psicología, 30(2), 450-462. http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self - regulated learning. En M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). Academic Press.
Pintrich, P., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. y McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Technical Report). The Regents of the University of Michigan. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271429287_A_Manual_for_the_Use_of_the_Motivated_Strategies_for_Learning_Questionnaire_MSLQ
Prieto,T., Blanco, A. y Brero, V. (2002). La progresión en el aprendizaje de dominios específicos: una propuesta para la investigación. Enseñanza de las Ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, 20(1), 3-14. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/article/view/21776/21610
Roldán, A.I., Ulloa, D., Vargas, L., Chura Z. y Pacheco, L.F. (2017). Comparación entre recorridos guiados tradicionales e indagatorios en el Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, La Paz - Bolivia. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(2), 367-384. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/19223
Romero-Ariza, M. (2017). El aprendizaje por indagación: ¿existen suficientes evidencias sobre sus beneficios en la enseñanza de las ciencias? Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(2), 286-299. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/eureka/article/view/3335
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socioscientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 339-358. doi: 10.1080/0305724042000733091
Sansone C, Harackiewicz JM. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance. Academic Press.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R. y Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Solbes J. (2013). Contribución de las cuestiones sociocientíficas al desarrollo de pensamiento crítico (I): Introducción. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 10(1), 1-10.
Wigfield, A., Hoa, L.W. y Lutz Klauda, S. (2008). The role of achievement values in the regulation of achievement behaviors. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning. Theory, research and applications (pp. 169-195). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zeidler, D. L., Applebaum, S. M. y Sadler, T. D. (2011). Enacting a socioscientific issues classroom: Transformative transformations. En T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in science classrooms: Teaching, Learning and Research (pp. 277–306). Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published work, provided that proper acknowledgement is given; the authorship of the work and first publication in AVANCES are mentioned; the material is not used for commercial purposes; and, if you create other material from the original material (e.g. a translation), you must distribute your contribution under this same licence as the original.
- Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2020-07-20
Published 2020-07-30
- Abstract 814
- PDF (Español (España)) 287