Invited Workshop: a teaching space to promote the intersection between profession and training.

Authors

  • Macarena Paz Barrientos Díaz Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3903-4502
  • Raúl Solís Figueroa Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Departamento de Arquitectura, Valparaíso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/astragalo.2025.i39.06

Keywords:

architecture, professional education, syllabus

Abstract

This article presents a critical reflection on historical and contemporary tensions between professional practice and architectural education, based on the analysis of a design studio format implemented since 1999 at Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María (Chile): the Taller Invitado (TI or guest studio). This design studio format directly articulates architectural education and its professional activity by inviting architects from outside the academic field to lead a design studio, accompanied by a host professor. Through a theoretical framework that addresses the challenges of complex universities and a historical review of TI projects, different teaching profiles, methodological and thematic approaches, and certain implications for the management and development of TI are addressed. Both the historical retrospective and its analysis allow to characterize the TI as a flexible platform, capable of accommodating a diversity of approaches—professionalizing, academic, and experimental—that enrich the teaching-learning process in architecture. Finally, challenges associated with this experience are identified in relation to the diversity of the student body, formative assessment, and the need to safeguard certain pedagogical standards. Contributions are also made regarding the promotion of the necessary two-way dialogue between the profession and training, which catalyzes disciplinary updating and opens spaces for highlighting multiple disciplinary emphases. In short, the TI experience contributes to redefining disciplinary education as a field of architectural research and to renewing educational approaches in a constantly changing social and professional context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Macarena Paz Barrientos Díaz, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María

Macarena Barrientos Díaz is an Architect and PhD in Architecture and Urbanism (UBB, Chile and UAH, Spain). She teaches in the Department of Architecture at the Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, as part of the Territory and Management Area. Her research interests address the city, feminisms and critical pedagogies of teaching and learning architecture.  She participates in the Grupo de Investigación en Didáctica Proyectual (GIDPRO), the Comité de Dicencia del Colegio de Arquitectos de Chile and is co-founder of the collective Aulaboratorio. She has participated in research projects as an external researcher and co-researcher in different universities and has taught in other architecture schools (UNAB and UVM in Chile), has participated in national and international conferences (GADU, JIDA, among others) and has published articles in various indexed journals (Arquitecturas del Sur, AUS, HipoTesis, i2, AP Continuidad, among others).

Raúl Solís Figueroa, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Departamento de Arquitectura, Valparaíso

Architect. Universidad Católica de Valparaíso 1996, Master's degree in architecture from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile in 2020. Since 1999 he has worked as a professor of architecture workshop at the Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María and in the practice of his profession in his own design office, mainly in the field of housing and ephemeral architecture. He has developed research on teaching architecture, which has been presented at various specialised congresses in the Latin American region. He is currently professor in charge of the introductory workshop to architecture, first year and referent professor in architecture degree processes.

References

Álvarez-Agea, Aurelio. 2023. “Profesional en lo académico, académico en lo profesional: el concurso como taller.” En XI Jornadas sobre Innovación Docente en Arquitectura (JIDA’23), eds. B. Bardí-Milà y D. García-Escudero, 60–76. Barcelona: UPC IDP. ISBN 978-84-10008-10-62.

Álvarez Lombardero, Nuria, ed. 2015. Arquitectas: Redefiniendo la profesión. Sevilla: Recolectores Urbanos.

———. 2020. “Otras prácticas españolas. Aproximaciones de arquitectas a enfoques feministas.” ZARCH 18: 186–197.

Awan, Nishat, Tatjana Schneider, y Jeremy Till. 2011. Spatial Agency: Other Ways of Doing Architecture. New York: Routledge.

Barrientos, M., y S. Solís. 2023. “El Taller Invitado: un espacio docente para vincular profesión y formación.” En XI Jornadas sobre Innovación Docente en Arquitectura (JIDA’23), eds. B. Bardí-Milà y D. García-Escudero, 967–978. Barcelona: UPC IDP. ISBN 978-84-10008-10-62.

Bertol-Gros, A., F. Álvarez-Atarés, y B. Gómez-Navarro. 2023. “Adecuación de un A(t)BP al ejercicio profesional de la arquitectura.” En XI Jornadas sobre Innovación Docente en Arquitectura (JIDA’23), eds. B. Bardí-Milà y D. García-Escudero, 77–87. Barcelona: UPC IDP. ISBN 978-84-10008-10-62.

Bilello, Joseph. 1991. Interaction and Interdependence: University-Based Architectural Education and the Architectural Profession. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architects.

Buchanan, Peter. 2012. “The Big Rethink: Architectural Education.” The Architectural Review 232 (1388): 91–101.

CNED. 2024. Sistema de Información INDICES. Consejo Nacional de Educación. https://www.cned.cl.

Coleman, Nathaniel. 2010. “The Limits of Professional Architectural Education.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 29: 200–212.

Cuff, Dana. 1996. “Celebrate the Gap Between.” Architecture 85 (8): 94–95.

Cunningham, Adrian. 2005. “Notes on Education and Research around Architecture.” The Journal of Architecture 10 (4): 415–441.

Fuentealba, J., M. Barrientos, R. Goycoolea, y C. Araneda. 2019. “El decisivo pero desatendido rol del Sistema Universitario en las Escuelas de Arquitectura.” En JIDA7. Textos de Arquitectura, Docencia e Innovación, eds. D. García-Escudero y B. Bardí-Milà, 51–65. Barcelona: RUBooks.

García-Escudero, D., y B. Bardí-Milà, eds. 2018. JIDA 5, Textos de arquitectura, docencia e innovación. Barcelona: RUBooks IDP UPC.

Goycoolea, Rodrigo. 2017. “Nuevas tecnologías y enseñanza de la Arquitectura.” Arquitectura y Humanidades. http://www.architecthum.edu.mx/Architecthumtemp/reflexdisenoarquno/Goycolea.htm.

Greene, M., K. Scheerlinck, y Y. Schoonjans. 2012. “The New Architect: Towards a Shared Authorship.” En Good Practices Best Practices: Highlighting the Compound Idea of Education, Creativity, Research and Practice. Delft: TU Delft.

Jiménez, P. 2010. “Formación por competencias en la enseñanza de la Arquitectura: ¿Un aporte? ¿Una necesidad? ¿O una moda?” Revista Electrónica de Desarrollo de Competencias (REDEC) 2 (6).

Masdeu, Marta. 2015. “La enseñanza de la arquitectura en la sociedad actual. La integración de las nuevas formas de práctica profesional en el Taller de Arquitectura.” RITA 5: 72–79.

———. 2017. “La transformación del taller de arquitectura en nuevos espacios de aprendizaje. Un estudio sobre el proceso de integración entre la enseñanza y la práctica profesional.” Tesis doctoral, Universitat de Girona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/482043.

Monedero, Javier. 2003. Enseñanza y práctica profesional de la arquitectura en Europa y EEUU. Barcelona: Departament d’Expressió Gràfica Arquitectònica I, ETSAB.

———. 2018. Crítica de la profesión de arquitecto.

Nieto, Eva. 2014. “Escuelas (alternativas) de arquitectura ¿Modelos (alternativos) de oposición?” Hipo2 Pedagogías Desobedientes 2: 24–31.

———. 2018. “Investigar sí ¿Pero para qué mundos?” Colección Investigaciones IdPA_04: 13–23.

———. 2022. Prescindible Organizado: Una agenda docente, afectiva y disidente para el proyecto arquitectónico. Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones.

Ockman, Joan, ed. 2012. Three Centuries of Educating Architects in North America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Perry, J., y C. McWilliams. 2017. “Accountability, Responsibility and School Leadership.” Journal of Educational Enquiry 7 (1): 33.

Schweitzer, M. A., ed. 1990. El Arquitecto en Chile: Universidad y Profesión. Santiago: Corporación de Promoción Universitaria.

Stevens, Garry. 1995. “Struggle in the Studio: A Bourdivin Look at Architectural Pedagogy.” Journal of Architectural Education 49 (2): 105–122.

Stratigakos, Despina. 2016. Where Are the Women Architects? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvct00dx.

Susin, Rodrigo. 2015. “Apuntes para pensar el significado de la universidad.” Revista de Investigación Educativa 8 (2): 6–22.

Teymur, Necdet. 2011. “Aprender de la educación en arquitectura.” Revista DEARQ 9: 8–17.

Torres Nadal, José M., y Eva Nieto. 2014. El Modelo Alicante: Disidencias espaciales en la enseñanza del proyecto de arquitectura. Alicante: Estudio Torres Nadal. http://www.torresnadal.com/web6/el-modelo-alicante-disidencias-espaciales-en-la-ensenanza-del-proyecto-de-arquitectura/.

Verde Zein, Ruth. 2023. “No se trata del canon, sino de cómo se usa.” Revista Dearq 36: 37–45. https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq36.2023.05.

Published

2025-09-27

How to Cite

Barrientos Díaz, M. P., & Solís Figueroa, R. (2025). Invited Workshop: a teaching space to promote the intersection between profession and training . Astragalo. Culture of Architecture and the City, (39), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.12795/astragalo.2025.i39.06