Influence of Multinational Enterprises on Local Industry Upgrading in Georgia

Shorena Kurdadze

Resumen


The purpose of this research is to identify Foreign Direct Investments in Georgia and to study their influence on the country's economy by considering sector and country characteristics. To assess the impact of foreign direct investment on local economies, the author interviewed companies operating in Georgia in 2009-2016. Then, because the measurement scales used in the survey were mainly binary and ordinary, the author used ProbiT Regression and Ordered ProbiT Regression models. Results obtained from surveys and from analyses using regression equations show that natural resource-seeking companies use local goods and services in their production processes; this is expressed in their linkages with local suppliers and distributors.  Conclusions are that foreign direct investments in Georgia have no significant influence on the development of local organizations and innovations. Although the Georgian market is small and the population is quite poor, market-seeking foreign direct investment is predominant. Multinational Enterprises that are directly engaged in foreign investments in Georgia (except for natural resources-seeking foreign direct investments), are rarely integrated with local markets.

Palabras clave


Foreign Direct Investment (FDI); OLI paradigm; Transition Economy; Regression model; FDI motivations

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Agosin, M. (2005). Foreign investment in developing countries: does it crowd in domestic investment? 149-162.

Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J-W (1998). How does foreign investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115-135.

Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review 9, 163-190 .

Hu, A., & Jefferson, G. (2002). FDI impact and spillover: Evidence from China’s. The World Economy, 1063-1076.

Khaturia, V. (2002). Liberalization, FDI, and productivity spillovers: An analysis of Indian manufacturing firms. Oxford Economic Papers, 688-718.

Kottaridia, C., Giakoulas , D., & Manolopoulosb, D. (2019). Escapism FDI from developed economies: The role of regulatory context and corporate taxation. International Business Review, 36-47.

Kurdadze, S. (2018, June). http://research.ciu.edu.ge. Retrieved from http://research.ciu.edu.ge.

Nistor, P. (2015). FDI Implications on BRICS Economy Growth. Procedia Economics and Finance, 981-985.

Lall, S. (1996). The investment development path: Some conclusions. In J. Dunning & R. Narula (Eds.), Foreign direct investment and governments: Catalysts for economic restructuring (pp. 423-441). London: Routledge.

Scott-Kennel, J. (2010). The impact of foreign direct investment on New Zealand industry. Retrieved from https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/4724/thesis.pdf?sequence=3.

Sikharulidze, Kurdadze, Tordinava. (2015). The Impacts of FDI on Domestic Investment (In Case of Georgia). SOCIÁLNO-EKONOMICKÁ REVUE, 35-40.

Sikharulidze, D. (2012). Motivations for foreign direct investment and their impact on Georgia’s economy. Economic and Business, 61-78.

Silajdzic, S., & Mehic, E. (2015). Knowledge Spillovers, Absorptive Capacities and the Impact of FDI on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Transition Economies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 614-623.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2020.i19.04

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.