Climate action obstruction in the Spanish far right: The Vox's amendment to the Climate Change Law and its press representation

Jose A. Moreno; Gina Thornton

doi:10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.02

Autores

Jose A. Moreno Universitat Pompeu Fabra https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3781-5644
Gina Thornton Independent researcher https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8333-908X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.02

Palavras-chave:

climate change, climate crisis, obstructionism, denialism, climate countermovement

Resumo

While we live in a crucial time when climate science urges us to take strong action to mitigate climate change, there is a countermovement obstructing the adoption of climate policies. In Europe, there are far right parties that have aligned their positions with the climate countermovement. This research seeks to examine the climate change discourse of the Spanish far-right party Vox, as well as the press reception of the party's ideas on the subject. This paper analyses the amendment to the whole Law Project on Climate Change and Energetic Transition (121/00019) presented by Vox on June 17, 2020, at the Spanish Parliament. The study consists of an examination of the climate action contrarian framings following the typology of Almiron et al. (2020). This enquiry is followed by a critical discourse analysis of the coverage of this amendment in the Spanish press. This press analysis provides an insight into whether journalists received Vox's proposal critically and aligned themselves with the scientific consensus, whether they reported it in a neutral way, or whether they supported its ideas. The results include a replication of hackneyed climate change denialist arguments as disseminated by European and North American climate action contrarian stakeholders. This paper also identifies a critical reaction from the Spanish press to this Vox amendment, despite the existence of some texts that report neutrally on the proposal.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##

Carregando Métricas ...

Referências

Aladro Vico, E., & Requeijo Rey, P. (2020). Discurso, estrategias e interacciones de Vox en su cuenta oficial de Instagram en las elecciones del 28-A. Derecha radical y redes sociales [Vox’s discourse, strategies and interactions on its official Instagram account in the 28-A elections. Radical right and social networks]. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 77, 203–229. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1455

Almiron, N., Boykoff, M., Narberhaus, M., & Heras, F. (2020). Dominant counter-frames in influential climate contrarian European think tanks. Climatic Change, 162(4), 2003–2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02820-4

Black, R. (2018). Denied: The rise and fall of climate contrarianism. The Real Press.

Boykoff, M. (2019). Creative (Climate) Communications: Productive Pathways for Science, Policy and Society. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108164047

Boykoff, M., & Farrell, J. (2020). Climate change countermovement organizations and media attention in the United States. In N. Almiron & J. Xifra (Eds.), Climate Change Denial and Public Relations (pp. 121–139). Routledge.

Cárdenas-Rica, M. L., & Lozano González, A. A. (2020). El miedo como recurso persuasivo en el discurso político. In N. Ruiz-Alba & J. A. Moreno (Eds.), Debates contemporáneos sobre poder, política y medios de comunicación. Egregius.

Cook, J., Ellerton, P., & Kinkead, D. (2018). Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 024018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f

CSSN. (2021). The Structure of Obstruction: Understanding Opposition to Climate Change Action in the United States (CSSN Primer). Climate Social Sciences Network (CSSN). https://bit.ly/31X4v8D

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social

Interaction: Discourse Studies 2 (A Multidisciplinary Introduction) (pp. 258-284). Sage.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.

Farrell, J. (2016). Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509433112

Fernández-Reyes, R. (2014). Infoxicación en la comunicación del cambio climático. Mitigación y adaptación [Infoxication in climate change communication. Mitigation and adaptation]. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 26, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.12795/ambitos.2014.i26.07

Ferreira, C. (2019). Vox como representante de la derecha radical en España: Un estudio sobre su ideología [Vox as a representative of the radical right in Spain: A study of its ideology]. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 51, 73–98. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.51.03

Fisher, D. R., Waggle, J., & Leifeld, P. (2013). Where does political polarization come from? Locating polarization within the U.S. climate change debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463360

Forchtner, B. (Ed.). (2019). The far right and the environment: Politics, discourse and communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351104043

Forchtner, B., & Lubarda, B. (2021, November 1). The far right has moved from climate denial to obstructing climate action. Open Democracy. https://bit.ly/3dP8dna

Forchtner, B., Kroneder, A., & Wetzel, D. (2018). Being skeptical? Exploring far-right climate-change communication in Germany. Environmental Communication, 12(5), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1470546

González, M. (2021, September 11). Vox alimenta el negacionismo para pescar votos entre los perdedores de la transición energética [Vox fuels denialism to catch votes among energy transition losers]. EL País. https://bit.ly/30ockDs

Gould, R. (2019). Vox España and Alternative für Deutschland: Propagating the crisis of national identity. Genealogy, 3(4), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy3040064

Hultman, M., Björk, A., & Viinikka, T. (2019). The far right and climate change denial. Denouncing environmental challenges via anti-establishment rhetoric, marketing of doubts, industrial/breadwinner masculinities enactments and ethno-nationalism. In B. Forchtner (Ed.), The Far Right and the Environment: Politics, Discourse and Communication. Routledge.

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

Jylhä, K. M., & Hellmer, K. (2020). Right‐wing populism and climate change denial: The roles of exclusionary and anti‐egalitarian preferences, conservative ideology, and antiestablishment attitudes. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20(1), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12203

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749

Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. SAGE.

Mancinas-Chávez, R. (2013). El silencio mediático. Reflexión en torno a las razones de los medios de comunicación para no hablar del cambio climático [Media silence. Reflection on the media’s reasons for not talking about climate change.]. In R. Mancinas Chávez (Ed.), Medios de comunicación y cambio climático (pp. 233–248). Universidad de Sevilla. https://idus.us.es/xmlui/handle/11441/30565

Martín-Sosa, S. (2021). Apuntes metodológicos para el estudio del negacionismo climático en los medios escritos. Communication & Methods, 3(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.35951/v3i1.111

McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity. The American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 100–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001

McKie, R. E. (2019). Climate change counter movement neutralization techniques: A typology to examine the climate change counter movement. Sociological Inquiry, 89(2), 288–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12246

Moreno, J. A., & Almiron, N. (2021). Representación en la prensa española del papel de la agricultura animal en la crisis climática [Representation in the Spanish press of the role of animal agriculture in the climate crisis]. Estudios Sobre El Mensaje Periodístico, 27(1), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.73745

Moreno, J. A., & Ruiz-Alba, N. (2021). Journalism or greenwashing? Sponsors of COP25 Chile-Madrid in the Spanish press. Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 12(2), 285–300. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.19089

Parratt Fernández, S., Mera Fernández, M., & Carrasco Polaino, R. (2020). La relevancia del cambio climático en la prensa española: Análisis comparativo de El País, El Mundo y ABC [The relevance of climate change in the Spanish press: A comparative analysis of El País, El Mundo and ABC]. OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 15(2), 625. https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2020.15.2.09

Piltz, R. (2008). The Denial Machine. Index on Censorship, 37(4), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03064220802561366

Rama, J., Zanotti, L., Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J., & Santana, A. (2021). VOX: The rise of the Spanish populist radical right. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003049227

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination. Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge.

Robaina, E. (2019, June 5). VOX y su argumentario contra el cambio climático: ‘No vamos a malgastar más dinero en esta estafa’ [VOX and its arguments against climate change: ‘We are not going to waste any more money on this scam’.]. La Marea. https://bit.ly/3m4EP0v

Schaller, S., & Carius, A. (2019). Convenient truths. Mapping climate agendas of right-wing populist parties in Europe. Adelphi. https://bit.ly/33iZXto

Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. (2019). Explaining the end of Spanish exceptionalism and electoral support for Vox. Research & Politics, 6(2), 205316801985168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019851680

van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1(2), 1600008. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008

Vowles, K., & Hultman, M. (2021). Scare-quoting climate: The rapid rise of climate denial in the Swedish far-right media ecosystem. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 3(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2021-0005

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.