La formación en el proceso de implementación del programa de responsabilidad personal y social: un estudio de casos
Abstract
El presente artículo examina la valoración que realizaron los profesores participantes en un curso de formación orientado a mejorar la implementación del Programa de Responsabilidad Personal y Social (PRPS) (Escartí, Pascual y Gutiérrez, 2005) en la escuela. Se trata de una investigación cualitativa a través de un doble estudio de casos. Las participantes fueron dos profesoras generalistas de Educación Primaria. La obtención de los datos se realizó a través de diarios personales y entrevistas. Para las participantes las fortalezas de la formación fueron: el intercambio de experiencias entre los participantes, el efecto motivador que tuvo que el facilitador del curso fuera un experto profesor de una universidad extranjera y la presentación de un nuevo enfoque metodológico más flexible en la aplicación del PRPS. Los puntos débiles de la formación fueron: la corta duración de la formación y una oferta insuficiente de actividades prácticas para el desarrollo de la responsabilidad en los niños. Las propuestas de mejora hechas por los participantes contemplaron el incremento de actividades prácticas específicas para el desarrollo del liderazgo y la transferencia, así como la utilización de una metodología basada en el active learning (Bonwell y Eison, 1991).
Abstract
This paper examines the assessment that the teachers participating in a training course did to improve the implementation of the Personal and Social Responsibility Program (PSRP) (Escartí, Pascual and Gutierrez, 2005) at school. This is a qualitative research through a double case study. Participants were two primary school teachers. Data were collected from teacher’s diaries and interviews. Findings: For the participants the strengths of the teacher training were: the exchange of experiences between participants, the motivating effect of the fact that the training facilitator was an expert teacher in a foreign university, and the presentation of a new more flexible methodological approach to implement PSRP. The teacher training weaknesses were: the short duration of training and the insufficient supply of practical activities to develop responsibility in children. In order to improve teacher training in PRPS the participants proposed specific practical activities to develop leadership and transference, and the use of a methodology based on active learning (Bonwell and Eison, 1991).
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
Authors conserve the copyrights and cede to the journal the right for first publication, with the work registered with the attribution licence of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published work as long as they mention the authorship and the first publication in this journal.
The authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g. include it an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
Authors are allowed and indeed recommended to publish their work on the internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the revision and publication process, because it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2016-02-02
Published 2016-02-02
- Abstract 301
- PDF (Español (España)) 152