Beyond climate change denialism. Conceptual challenges in communicating climate action obstruction

Núria Almiron; Jose A. Moreno

doi:10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.01

Autores

Núria Almiron Universitat Pompeu Fabra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2482-0666
Jose A. Moreno Universitat Pompeu Fabra https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3781-5644

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.01

Palavras-chave:

climate change, denialism, inaction, obstructionism, contrarianism

Resumo

Climate change has been the subject of much research in various fields of the social sciences in recent decades, including that of communication. As a result, much evidence has been accumulated on the complex reality behind political inaction in this regard. However, when it comes to communicating this reality, the media, and part of academia, have tended to simplify this complexity by focusing on the climate countermovement and literal denialism of the phenomenon. This countermovement has been extensively studied in the United States, revealing the existence of a highly influential anthropogenic climate change denialism in that country. However, academic research has also shown that political inaction on the climate cannot be explained by denialism alone; not in the United States, and much less in Europe. In this article, we question the current indiscriminate use of the concept of denialism and suggest the incorporation of a more sophisticated conceptual and analytical framework that provides more nuance and aligns with the evidence emerging from academic research. It is a matter not only of critically communicating the reality of political inaction with regard to the climate, but also of identifying the entire spectrum of responsibilities, which are not limited to simply denying or not denying climate change.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##

Carregando Métricas ...

Referências

Adams, C. (2010). The sexual politics of meat. A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. The Continuum International Publishing Group.

Ahmed, S. (2019). La promesa de la felicidad. Caja Negra.

Almiron, N. (2020). Meat taboo: Climate change and the EU meat lobby. En J. Hannan (Ed.), Meatsplaining: The Animal Agriculture Industry and the Rhetoric of Denial (pp. 163-186). Sidney University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15tt7dr.11

Almiron, N., Boykoff, M., Narberhaus, M., y Heras, F. (2020). Dominant counter-frames in influential climate contrarian European think tanks. Climatic Change, 162(4), 2003-2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02820-4

Almiron, N., y Moreno, J. A. (2021). Think tanks neoliberales y falsos debates: La propuesta del impuesto a la carne para combatir la crisis climática. En D. Rodrigo-Cano, R. Mancinas-Chávez, y R. Fernández-Reyes (Eds.), La comunicación del cambio climático, una herramienta ante el gran desafío (pp. 222-248). Dykinson. https://bit.ly/3pZrurF

Almiron, N., Rodrigo-Alsina, M., y Moreno, J. A. (2021). Manufacturing ignorance: Think tanks, climate change and the animal-based diet. Environmental Politics, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1933842

Almiron, N., y Tafalla, M. (2019). Rethinking the Ethical Challenge in the Climate Deadlock: Anthropocentrism, Ideological Denial and Animal Liberation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(2), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09772-5

Almiron, N., y Xifra, J. (2020). Climate Change Denial and Public Relations. Strategic Communication and Interest Groups in Climate Inaction. En Climate Change Denial and Public Relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351121798

Best, S. (2014). Moral Progress and the Struggle for Human Evolution. En The Politics of Total Liberation. Revolution for the 21st Century (pp. 87-98). Palgrave Macmillan.

Boykoff, M. (2016). Consensus and contrarianism on climate change: How the USA case informs dynamics elsewhere. Mètode Revista de difusió de la investigació, 6, 89-95. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.85.4182

Boykoff, M. (2019). Creative (Climate) Communications: Productive Pathways for Science, Policy and Society (1.a ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108164047

Brulle, R. J. (2014). Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change, 122(4), 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7

Coan, T., Boussalis, C., Cook, J., y Nanko, M. (2021). Computer-assisted detection and classification of misinformation about climate change [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/crxfm

Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Polity Press.

CSSN. (2021). The Structure of Obstruction: Understanding Opposition to Climate Change Action in the United States (CSSN Primer). Climate Social Sciences Network (CSSN). https://bit.ly/3GI10l3

de Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., y Soares, G. R. da L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3

Duerringer, C. (2015). Be a Man—Buy a car! Articulating masculinity with consumerism in «Man’s last stand». Southern Communication Journal, 80(2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2015.1017654

Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Climate change skepticism and denial. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 691-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213477097

Dunlap, R. E., y McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. En J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard y D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change (pp. 144-160). Oxford University Press.

Dunlap, R. E., y McCright, A. M. (2015). Challenging climate change: The denial countermovement. En R. E. Dunlap y R. Brulle (Eds.), Climate change and society: Sociological perspectives (pp. 300-332). Oxford University Press.

European Parliament. (2017). Special Eurobarometer 459: Climate change. Directorate-General for Communication. https://bit.ly/322VN8h

Farand, C., Hope, M., y Collett-White, R. (2019, 7 de junio). Mapped: A who’s who of Brexit and climate science denial. DeSmog. https://bit.ly/3m0yCmk

Fernández-Reyes, R. (2013). Reflexiones sobre un periodismo en transición. En R. Mancinas-Chávez y R. Fernández-Reyes (Eds.) Medios de comunicación y cambio climático. Actas de las Jornadas Internacionales, (pp. 249-272). Fenix Editora. https://bit.ly/30oOjMv

Fernández-Reyes, R. (2014). Infoxicación en la comunicación del cambio climático. Mitigación y adaptación. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 26, 66-76. https://doi.org/10.12795/ambitos.2014.i26.07

Gaard, G. (2015). Ecofeminism and climate change. Women’s Studies International Forum, 49, 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.02.004

Garcés, M. (2017). Nova il·lustració radical. Anagrama.

Hathaway, J. R. (2020). Climate change, the intersectional imperative, and the opportunity of the Green New Deal. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1629977

Herrero, Y. (2013). Miradas ecofeministas para transitar a un mundo justo y sostenible. Revista de economía crítica, 16, 278-307.

Hribal, J. (2014). Los animales son parte de la clase trabajadora y otros ensayos. Ochodoscuatro. https://bit.ly/3EYTDp8

Hultman, M., y Pulé, P. M. (2018). Ecological Masculinities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315195223

Huth, K., y Peters, J. (2020, 4 de febrero). Die Heartland lobby. Correctiv. https://bit.ly/3ypKrHK

Ivanova, D., Barrett, J., Wiedenhofer, D., Macura, B., Callaghan, M. W., y Creutzig, F. (2020). Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), 093001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589

Jacques, P. J. (2012). A general theory of climate denial. Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00105

Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., y Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802055576

Jylhä, K. M., y Hellmer, K. (2020). Right‐wing populism and climate change denial: The roles of exclusionary and anti‐egalitarian preferences, conservative ideology, and antiestablishment attitudes. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20(1), 315-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12203

Kaijser, A., y Kronsell, A. (2014). Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Environmental Politics, 23(3), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.835203

Keyßer, L. T., y Lenzen, M. (2021). 1.5 °C degrowth scenarios suggest the need for new mitigation pathways. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22884-9

Kramcksak Muñoz, X. C. (2021). ONGs ecologistas en España. Discurso, negacionismo ideológico y crisis climática. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales, 8(1), 151–183.

Lahsen, M. (2013). Anatomy of dissent: A cultural analysis of climate skepticism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 732-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469799

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749

Lakoff, G. (2014). Don’t think of an elephant! (2.a ed.). Chelsea Green.

Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., y Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3, e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13

Love, H. J., y Sulikowski, D. (2018). Of meat and men: Sex differences in implicit and explicit attitudes toward meat. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00559

Mancinas-Chávez, R. (2013). El silencio mediático. Reflexión en torno a las razones de los medios de comunicación para no hablar del cambio climático. En R. Mancinas Chávez y R. Fernández-Reyes (Eds.), Medios de comunicación y cambio climático (pp. 233-248). Fénix Editora. https://bit.ly/3oRjb1M

McCright, A. M. (2007). Dealing with climate change contrarians. En S. C. Moser y L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change (pp. 200-212). Cambridge University Press.

McCright, A. M., y Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity. The American Conservative Movement’s Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 100-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001

McCright, A. M., y Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163-1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003

McKie, R. E. (2017). Rebranding the climate change counter movement: A critical examination of counter movement messaging through a criminological and political economic lens [Tesis doctoral]. https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/15355

McKie, R. E. (2021). Climate change obstruction, criminal negligence and ecological collapse. The Peace Chronicle. The Magazine of the Peace and Justice Studies Association. https://bit.ly/3dVp0ok

Mies, M. (2018). Patriarcado y acumulación a escala mundial. Traficantes de Sueños.

Moreno, J. A., y Ruiz-Alba, N. (2021). ¿Periodismo o greenwashing? Patrocinadores de la COP25 Chile-Madrid en la prensa española. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 12(2), 285-300. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.19089

Moreno-Cabezudo, J. A. (2018). Estructura informativa y Cambio Climático: El caso de «El País». En R. Fernández-Reyes y D. Rodrigo-Cano (Eds.), La comunicación de la mitigación y la adaptación al Cambio Climático (pp. 77-98). Egregius. https://bit.ly/3pUsc9u

Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press.

O’Neill, S. J., y Boykoff, M. (2010). Climate denier, skeptic, or contrarian? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(39), E151-E151. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010507107

Oreskes, N., y Conway, E. M. (2018). Mercaderes de la duda. Cómo un puñado de científicos ocultaron la verdad sobre el calentamiento global. Capitán Swing.

Piltz, R. (2008). The Denial Machine. Index on Censorship, 37(4), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03064220802561366

Rekker, R. (2021). The nature and origins of political polarization over science. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 352-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521989193

Rothgerber, H. (2013). Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(4), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030379

Supran, G., y Oreskes, N. (2017). Assessing ExxonMobil’s climate change communications (1977–2014). Environmental Research Letters, 12(8), 084019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f

Supran, G., y Oreskes, N. (2021). Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil’s climate change communications. One Earth, S2590332221002335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014

Taibo, C. (2011). En defensa del decrecimiento. Sobre capitalismo, crisis y barbarie. Catarata.

Walker, L., Butland, D., y Connell, R. (2000). Boys on the road: Masculinities, car culture, and road safety education. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 8(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0802.153