Fake news: understanding the evolution of mediated deception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2021.i54.07Keywords:
fake news, disinformation, journalismAbstract
Fake news and information manipulation are far from being a novelty. However, the particular techno-social circumstances of our time have increased its visibility and people’s exposure to these manifestations. This article proposes a non-systematic literature review, articulating and problematizing various dimensions that contribute to a deeper understanding of the specificities and complexities of the current context, as well as the conditions that brought us here. Based on a historiographic approach of the upsurge of lies mediated by the press, the article analyses the process that led to the appearance of falsehood as a clear consequence of the rapid evolution of journalism. This path eventually led to the complex context of the network society, with its numerous challenges that journalists and media companies have been unable to fully address. The cognitive processes of people, fully immersed in an unprecedented amount of information, are also addressed as pieces of the multidimensional problematization that is proposed in the article. By analyzing a system that promotes a permanent and relentless informational overdose, this article does not intend to quantify the impacts of disinformation. Rather, it emphasizes the complex interconnections that, over the years, have shaped a problem that, ultimately, is a civilizational challenge.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aguaded, I. e Romero-Rodríguez, L. (2015). Mediamorfosis y desinformación en la infoesfera: Alfabetización mediática, digital e informacional ante los cambios de hábitos de consumo informativo. Education in the knowledge society, 16(1), 44-57.
Aguaded, I. e Romero-Rodríguez, L. (Eds.) (2018). Competencias mediáticas en medios digitales emergentes. Comunicación Social Ediciones y Publicaciones.
Atkins, S. E. (2009). Holocaust denial as an international movement. Praeger.
Allcott, H. e Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-36.
Antonio, R. J. e Brulle, R. J. (2011). The unbearable lightness of politics: Climate change denial and political polarization. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 195-202.
Bakir, V. e McStay, A. (2017). Fake news and the economy of emotions. Digital Journalism 6(2), 1-22.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S. e Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239), 1130–32.
Barnes, J. A. (1994). A pack of lies: Towards a sociology of lying. Cambridge University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1991). Simulacros e simulação. Relógio d’Agua.
Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241-262.
Blum, S. D. (2005). Five approaches to explaining “Truth” and “Deception” in human communication. Journal of Anthropological Research, 61(3), 289-315.
Bohn, R. e Short, J. (2012). Measuring consumer information. International Journal of Communication, 6, 980–1000.
Bok, S. (1979). Lying. Moral choice in public and private life. Vintage Books.
Borden, S. e Tew, C. (2007). The role of journalist and the performance of journalism: Ethical lessons from ‘fake’ news (seriously). Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(4), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520701583586
Bougnoux, D. (1995). La Communication contre l´information. Hachette.
Bovet, A. e Maske, H. A. (2019). Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature Communications, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2
Boyd, d. (2017, January 5). Did media literacy backfire? Data & Society: Points. Retrieved from https://points.datasociety.net/did-media-literacy-backfire-7418c084d88d
Brady, H. (2019). The challenge of big data and data science. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 297-323.
Bryant, E. (2008). Real lies, white lies, and gray lies: Towards a typology of deception. Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research, 7, 23-48.
Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? Polity Press.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1997a). An introduction to the information age. City: Analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 2(7), 6-16.
Castells, M. (1997b). The power of identity, the information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. II. Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2005). The network society: from knowledge to policy. In M. Castells e G. Cardoso, (Eds.) The network society: From knowledge to policy (3-22). Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.
Chigwedere, P., Seage, G. R., Gruskin, S., Lee, T.-H. e Essex, M. (2008). Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 49(4), 410–415.
Creech, B. e Roessner, A. (2019). Declaring the value of truth. Journalism Practice, 13(3), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1472526
Darnton, C. (2017, 13 de fevereiro). The true history of fake news. The New York Review. https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2017/02/13/the-true-history-of-fake-news/?lp_txn_id=1021367
Davis, S. e Straubhaar, J. (2020). Producing Antipetismo: Media activism and the rise of the radical, nationalist right in contemporary Brazil. International Communication Gazette, 82(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519880731
Debord, G. (2003). A sociedade do espectáculo. Contraponto.
Del-Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. e Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554-559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113
Dubois, E. e Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media, Information. Communication e Society, 21(5), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the Independent High-Level Group on Fake News and Online Disinformation. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2759/739290.
Faris, R. M., Roberts, H. Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E. e Benkler, Y. (2017). Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet e Society Research Paper.
Figueira, J. e Santos, S. (2019). Percepción de las noticias falsas en universitarios de Portugal: Análisis de su consumo y actitudes”. El profesional de la información, 28(3), e280315. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.may.15
Fink, K. (2019). The biggest challenge facing journalism: A lack of trust. Journalism, 20(1), 40-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807069
Flaherty, D. K. (2011). The vaccine-autism connection: A public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 45(10), 1302–1304.
Flaxman, S., Goel, S. e Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298-320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach. Clarendon Press.
Freeden, M. (1998). Is nationalism a distinct ideology? Political Studies, XLVI, 748-765.
Gorbach, J. (2018). Not your grandpa’s hoax: A comparative history of fake news. American Journalism, 35(2), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2018.1457915
Guess, A., Nyhan, B. e Reifler, J. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. European Research Council.
Hansen, G. J. e Kim, H. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565280
Hetherington, M. J. e Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
Holan, A. D. (2016, 13 de dezembro). Lie of the year: Fake news. Politifact. https://www.politifact.com/article/2016/dec/13/2016-lie-year-fake-news/
Jaiswal J., LoSchiavo C. e Perlman. D (2020). Disinformation, misinformation and inequality - Driven mistrust in the time of COVID-19: Lessons unlearned from AIDS denialism. AIDS and Behavior, 24, 2776–2780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02925-y
Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Kalichman, S. C. (2009). Denying AIDS: Conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and human tragedy. Springer.
Kellner, D. (2003). Media spectacle. Routledge.
Kovach, B. e Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The elements of Journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press.
Krafft, T., Gamer, M. e Zweig, K. (2017. What did you see?
Personalization, regionalization and the question of the filter bubble in Google’s search engine. Proceedings of ACM Conference, Washington.
Kumar, S. e Shah, N. (2018). False information on web and social media: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08559.
Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. Plenum Trade.
Lévy, P. (2015) Collective intelligence for educators. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(8), 749-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1053734
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. e Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. Plos one, 10(8), e0134773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. e Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the ‘post-truth’ era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Volume 6(4), 353-369.
Love, R. (2007). Before Jon Stewart. Columbia journalism review, 45(6), 33-37.
Malone, T. e Bernstein M. (2015). Handbook of collective intelligence. MIT Press.
Manjoo, F. (2008). True enough: Learning to live in a post-fact society. Wiley and Sons.
Marr, B. (2018, 21 de maio). How much data do we create every day? The mind-blowing stats everyone should read. Forbes.
McCarty, N., Poole, K. e Rosenthal, H. (2016). Polarized America. MIT Press.
Mcchesney, R. (2003). The problem of journalism: A political economic contribution to an explanation of the crisis in contemporary US journalism, Journalism Studies, 4(3), 299-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700306492
McCornack, S. (1992). Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376245
McCright, A. M. e Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press.
Mihailidis, P. e Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacies in ‘post-fact’ society. American behavioral scientist, 61(4), 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217701217
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Muller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Nerone, J. (1987). The mythology of the penny press. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4(4), 376-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038709360146
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330.
Olsson, T. (2010). From the ecology of broadcasting to the ecology of participation: Critical reflections. Nordicom Review, 31, 95-104.
Pandita, R. (2017). Internet: A change agent an overview of internet penetration e growth across the world. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 7(2), 83-91.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Viking.
Park, R. (1940). News as a form of knowledge: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 45(5), 669-686.
Pennycook, G. e Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50.
Poole, K., e Rosenthal, H. (1984). The polarization of American politics. The Journal of Politics, 46(4), 1061-1079.
Prior, H. (2019). Em nome do povo: O populismo e o novo ecossistema mediático. In: J. Figueira, e S. Santos (Eds.) As fake news e a nova ordem (des)informativa na era da pós-verdade (123-146). Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
Ross, A. S. e Rivers, D. J. (2018). Discursive deflection: Accusation of ‘Fake News’ and the spread of mis and disinformation in the tweets of president Trump. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010
Roggenkamp, K. (2013). Elizabeth Jordan, ‘True Stories of the News’, and
newspaper fiction in late-nineteenth-century journalism. In: M. Canada (Ed.) Literature and Journalism: Inspirations, intersections, and inventions from Ben Franklin to Stephen Colbert (119-142). Pallgrave Macmillan.
Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., Valle-Razo, A. e Torres-Toukoumidis, A. (2018). Hacia una construcción conceptual de las fake news: Epistemologías y tipologías de las nuevas formas de desinformación. In: M. J. Pérez-Serrano, G. Alcolea-Díaz e A. I., Nogales-Bocio, (Eds.), Poder y medios en las sociedades del siglo XXI (259-273). Egregius.
Russell, J. C. e Blackburn, T. (2017). The rise of invasive species denialism. Trends in Ecology e Evolution, 32(1), 3-6.
Schmid, P. e Betsch, C. (2019). Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 931–939.
Schudson, M. (1978) Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. Basic Books.
Sezen-Barrie, A., Shea, N. e Borman, J. (2019). Probing into the sources of ignorance: science teachers’ practices of constructing arguments or rebuttals
to denialism of climate change. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 846-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1330949
Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K.-C., Flammini, A. e Menczer, F. (2016). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications, 9, 4787.
Spencer, D. R. (2007). The yellow journalism. The press and America’s emergence as a world power. Northwestern University Press.
Sunstein, C. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z.-W. e Ling, R. (2018). Defining ‘fake news’. Digital journalism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, D. e Ling, R. (2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21(3), 381, 389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325
Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A. J. e Maddex, B. D. (2001). Accidentally informed: News exposure on the world wide web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 533-554.
Thornton, B. (2000). The Moon hoax: Debates about ethics in 1835 New York newspapers. Journal of mass media ethics, 15(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327728JMME1502_3
Toffler, A. (1981). The third wave: Bantam Books.
Tucher, A. (1994). Froth and scum: Truth, beauty, goodness, and the ax murder in America’s first mass medium. North Carolina Press.
Tucher, A. (2013). The true, the false, and the ‘not exactly lying’: Making fakes and telling stories in the age of the real thing. In: M. Canada (Ed.), Literature and journalism: Inspirations, intersections, and inventions from Ben Franklin to Stephen Colbert (91-118). Palgrave MacMillan.
Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D. e Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Menlo Park: William Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139.
Uberti, D. (15 de dezembro 2016). The real history of fake news. Columbia journalism review. https://www.cjr.org/special_report/fake_news_history.php
Umbelino, L. A. (2019). Para acabar de vez com as boas notícias. Elogio das pequenas coerências e da justa complexidade. In: J. Figueira e S. Santos (Eds.), As fake news e a nova ordem (des)informativa na era da pós-verdade (167-176). Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
Wegner, D. M., Coulton, G. F. e Wenzlaff, R. (1985). The transparency of denial: Briefing in the debriefing program. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 338-346.
Wei, K. K., Teo, H. H., Chan, H. C. e Tan, B. C. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170– 87.
Zhou, X. e Zafarani, R. (2018). Fake news: A survey of research, detection methods, and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00315.
Zmigrod, L., Eisenberg, I., Bisset, P., Robbins, T. e Poldrack, R. (2021). The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: A data-driven approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822). http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0424
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Silvio Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available at no charge to the user or their institution. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author. This definition of open access is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI).
Unless otherwise noted, all content in the electronic edition is distributed under a "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License". You can consult the informative version and legal text of the licence here. This should be expressly stated in this way where necessary.
In case of acceptance of the manuscript, the authors cede the rights of the work for its publication to Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license contract (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The authors retain copyright and third parties are authorised to copy, distribute and make use of the work, provided they comply with the terms and conditions set out in the licence
- Cite the authorship and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work).
- Do not use them for commercial purposes.
- If you remix, transform or create from the material, you must release your contributions under the same license as the original.
More information can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
- Abstract 1613
- pdf (Español (España)) 236
