Intimidad pública en los medios sociales -extimidad como presencia conectada

Samuel Mateus

doi:10.12795/Ambitos.2024.i64.10

Autores/as

Samuel Mateus Universidade da Madeira; LABCOM https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1034-6449

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2024.i64.10

Palabras clave:

extimidad, intimidad pública, presencia conectada, medios sociales, derechos digitales

Resumen

La experiencia moderna de la intimidad y la socialidad se está transformando radicalmente, afectando no sólo a la calidad de las relaciones sociales, sino también a la experiencia del yo y a las fronteras entre las expresiones privadas y públicas del yo. Los medios sociales son aspectos primordiales de las prácticas de intimidad actuales. Satisfacen una necesidad y un deseo de comunicación (a distancia) y un sentimiento de conexión (mediada).

En este artículo se presentan las transformaciones contemporáneas de la intimidad. La hipótesis es que desde el siglo XX se está produciendo una reordenación de los ámbitos privado y público, y que es necesaria una nueva teoría de la publicidad y lo público. Sólo una reconceptualización de las nociones modernas de “público” y “privado” permite comprender plenamente las mutaciones de la intimidad pública provocadas por los medios sociales. El objetivo es demostrar que la intimidad está modulada por los medios de comunicación y que necesitamos conceptos, como extimidad y presencia conectada, para aprehenderla y evaluarla plenamente.

El artículo comienza relatando las transformaciones de la intimidad moderna y su redefinición contemporánea. A continuación, se traza una caracterización de las articulaciones contemporáneas de la intimidad y se presentan las implicaciones de la extimidad para el individuo en el contexto de sociedades altamente mediatizadas. Se argumenta que la extimidad implica una reformulación completa de la intimidad moderna en dirección o una intimidad pública maleable, fluida y negociada. Su importancia es aún mayor en la actualidad, ya que la creciente diferenciación y performatividad de la vida social exigen la gestión de las relaciones sociales.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Abraham, D. (2020). Impact of Digital Media in Society. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 8(5), 2742-2748.

Adelman, M. B., Parks, M. R., & Albrecht, T. L. (1987). Beyond close relationships: Support in weak ties. In T. L. Albrecht & M. B. Adelman (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp.126-147). Sage.

Andreassen, R., Petersen, M. N., Harrison, K., & Raun, T. (Eds.). (2017). Mediated Intimacies: Connectivities, Relationalities and Proximities (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208589

Ardèvol, E., & Gómez-Cruz, E. (2012). Cuerpo privado, imagen pública: El autorretrato en la práctica de la fotografía digital [Private body, public image: The self-portrait in the practice of digital photography]. Revista de dialectología y tradiciones populares, (67) 181–208.

Arendt, Hannah (2001). A Condição Humana [The Human Condition]. Relógio d’Água.

Ariès, P., Duby, G., & Mazal, H. (1987). A history of private life. Press of Harvard University Press.

Baker, J. R., & Moore, S. M. (2008). Distress, coping, and blogging: Comparing new MySpace users by their intention to blog. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 11(1), 81-85.

Barker, M.J., Gill, R., & Harvey, L. (2018). Mediated intimacy: Sex advice in media culture. Sexualities, 21(8), 1337-1345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718781342

Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 281–288.

Bazarova, N. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 815–832.

Brodin, O., & Magnier, L. (2012). Le développement d’un index d’exposition de soi dans les médias sociaux: phase exploratoire d’identification des indicateurs constitutifs. Management & Avenir, (58), 144-168. https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.058.0144

Bucher, T. (2012). The friendship assemblage: Investigating programmed sociality on Facebook, Television & New Media,14(6), 479–493.

Cabalquinto, E. C. (2018). Ambivalent intimacies: entangled pains and gains through Facebook use in transnational family life. In A. S. Dobson, N. Carah & B. Robards (Eds.), Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media (pp. 247–263). Springer.

Cervi, D. L., & Marín-Lladó, D. C. (2022). La privacidad, un desafío para periodistas y comunicadores. Análisis de la privacidad en los estudios universitarios de comunicación de Europa y Estados Unidos. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, (55), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.08

Chambers, D. (2017). Networked intimacy: Algorithmic friendship and scalable sociality. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 26–36.

David, G., & Cambre, C. (2016). Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641976

Dobson, A. S., Carah, N., & Robards, B. (Eds.) (2018). Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media. Palgrave Macmillan.

Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public Displays of Connection. BT Technology Journal, (22), 71–82.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media and Society, (13), 873-892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389

Gervasoni, T. A., Bolesina, I., & Dias, F. V. (2022). The Right to Extimacy and the Technological-Neoliberal Social Control. Opinión Jurídica, 21(46 (special)), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v21n46a1

Hjorth, L., & Lim, S. (2012). Mobile intimacy in an age of affective mobile media. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4), 477-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741860

Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Pink, S., Zhou, B., Kato, F., Bell, G., Ohashi, K., Marmo, C., & Xiao, M. (2016). Digital kinships: Intergenerational locative media in Tokyo, Shanghai and Melbourne. In L. Hjorth & O. Khoo (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of New Media in Asia (pp. 251-262). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774626

Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science. Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893

Hsu, C. W., Wang, C. C., & Yi-Ting, T. (2011). The closer the relationship, the more the interaction on Facebook? Investigating the case of Taiwan users. Cyberpsychology. Behavior, and Social Networking, 4(7-8), 473-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0267

Jamieson, L. (2012). Intimacy as a concept: Explaining social change in the context of globalisation or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online. 16(4). 151-163, https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2497

Kaplan, D. (2021). Public intimacy in social media: The mass audience as a third party. Media, Culture & Society, 43(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443721991087

Keightley, E., & Reading, A. (2014). Mediated mobilities. Media Culture & Society, (36), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437135177

Kim, J., & Lee, J. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0374

Klein, A. (2010). Entre Médiation et Médiatisation, Dynamiques Identitaires en Jeu Dans les Dispositifs d’Autopublication sur Internet. Journal for Communication Studies. ESSACHESS, 3(6), 147-161.

Lambert, A. (2016). Intimacy and social capital on Facebook: Beyond the psychological perspective. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2559–2575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815588902

Lásen, A. (2015). Digital Self-Portraits, Exposure and the Modulation of Intimacy. In J. R. Carvalheiro & A. S. Tellería (Eds.), Mobile and digital communication: approaches to public and private (pp. 61-78). Labcom Books.

Lash, C. (1991). Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. W. W. Norton & Company.

Lomborg, S. (2013). Social media, social genres: Making sense of the ordinary. Routledge.

Licoppe, C. (2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone. In J. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of communication technology (pp. 171–186).Transaction Publishers.

Lipovetsky, G. (1989). A Era do Vazio. Relógio d’Água.

Malik, A., Dhir, A., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on Facebook. Telematics and Informatics, (33), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.009

Manning, J. (2014). Social media, definition and classes of. In K. Harvey (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social media and politics (pp. 1158-1162). Thousand Oaks. Sage.

Martinot D. (2008). Le soi, les autres et la société. PUG

Mateus, S. (2010). Public Intimacy. Sphera Publica- revista de ciencias sociales y de la comunicación, (10), 57–70.

Mateus, S. (2018). Affective Rhetoric- what is it and why it matters. In C. Clark, & L. Zhang (Eds.), Affect, Emotion, and Rhetorical Persuasion in Mass Communication (pp. 69-80). Routledge.

Mateus, S. (2024). O Fim da Esfera pública e a Nova Teoria da Publicidade- lições de comunicação política. Pimenta Cultural.

Mehl, D. (1996). La Télévision de l’Intimité. Seuil.

Mendelson, E. A. (2023). Sensemaking and public intimacy on TikTok: How viral videos influence interpersonal relationships offline. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231163231

Miguel, C. (2016). Researching intimacy through social media: a cross-platform approach. MedieKultur, (60), 50-69.

Miller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387–400.

Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, F., & LaRose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction.

Oswald, D. L., & Clark, E. M. (2006). How do friendship maintenance behaviors and problem-solving styles function at the individual and dyadic levels? Personal Relationships, (13), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00121.x

Pasquali Falchi, M. do C. (2023). Midiatização e o processo de extimidade de pacientes com Síndrome de Turner nas plataformas digitais. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud, 14(2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2023.7212

Pedroni, M., Pasquali, F., & Carlo, S. (2014). My friends are my audience: Mass-mediation of personal content and relations in Facebook. Observatorio (OBS)*, (8), 97–113.

Pedruzzi, P., Medeiros de Almeida, I., Matos, F., & Andrade, A. (2021). Social Media Motivations Scale (SMM-S): Measure Adaptation and Predictors. Liberabit, 27(2). 2223-7666 https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2021.v27n2.04

Pollet, T., Roberts, S. B. G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, (14), 253-258.

Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked Individualism: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MIT press.

Rojek, C. (2015). Presumed intimacy: Parasocial interaction in media, society and celebrity culture. Oxford, Polity Press.

Sandoval Martín, M.T. (2000). La Red: el nuevo mercado de la vida privada. Ambitos: Revista internacional de comunicación, (5), 143-155.

Schandorf, M. (2019). Communication as Gesture: Media(tion), Meaning, & Movement. Emerald Publishing.

Sennett, R. (1974). The Fall Of Public Man. WW Norton & Company.

Sennett, R. (1992). The Conscience of the Eye- the design and social life of cities. WW Norton & Company.

Sutcliffe, A. G., Binder, J. F., & Dunbar, R. (2018). Activity in social media and intimacy in social relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, (85), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.050

Tisseron, S. (2003). L’Intimité surexposée. Hachette Litterature.

Tisseron, S. (2008). Virtual, mon amour – Penser, aimer, souffrir à l´ère des nouvelles technologies. Albin Miche.

Van House, N. A. (2007). Flickr and public image-sharing: Distant closeness and photo exhibition. In CH’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 28 April–3 May 2007 (pp. 2717–2722). ACM.

Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., & Bunyan, M. (2005). Mediating intimacy: Designing technologies to support strong-tie relations. IN W. Kellogg, S. Zhai, C. Gale and G. Veer (eds.) Proceedings of ‘Technology, safety, community’, the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘05), Portland, Oregon, United States, 02–07 April 2005 (471–480). https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055038

Wang, V., Tucker, J. V., & Haines, K. (2012). Phatic Technologies in Modern Society. Technology in Society, (34), 84-93.

Watson, A., Lupton, D., & Michael, M. (2021). Enacting intimacy and sociality at a distance in the COVID-19 crisis: the sociomaterialities of home-based communication technologies. Media International Australia, 178(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20961568

Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041