Intimidad pública en los medios sociales -extimidad como presencia conectada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2024.i64.10Palavras-chave:
extimacy, public intimacy, connected presence, social media, digital rightsResumo
The modern experience of intimacy and sociality is being radically transformed, impacting not just the quality of social relationships but also the experience of the self and the borders between private and public expressions of the self. Social media are prime aspects of today’s intimacy practices. They fulfil a need and desire for (remote) communications and a feeling of (mediated) connection.
The contemporary transformations regarding intimacy are presented in this paper. It is stated as a hypothesis that a reordering of the private and public realms has been happening since the 20th century, requiring a new theory of publicity and publicness. Only a reconceptualization of the modern notions of “public” and “private” enables us to fully understand the mutations in public intimacy provoked by social media. The objective is to demonstrate that media modulates intimacy, and concepts such as extimacy and connected presence are needed to fully comprehend and evaluate it.
This work begins by recounting the transformations in modern intimacy and its contemporary redefinition. Then, a characterization of the contemporary articulations of intimacy is drawn, and the implications of extimacy for the individual in the context of highly mediatized societies are presented. It is argued that extimacy involves a complete reformulation of modern intimacy in direction or a malleable, fluid, and negotiated, public intimacy. It is even more important today as growing differentiation and performativity in social life demand the management of social relations.
Downloads
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Referências
Abraham, D. (2020). Impact of Digital Media in Society. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 8(5), 2742-2748.
Adelman, M. B., Parks, M. R., & Albrecht, T. L. (1987). Beyond close relationships: Support in weak ties. In T. L. Albrecht & M. B. Adelman (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp.126-147). Sage.
Andreassen, R., Petersen, M. N., Harrison, K., & Raun, T. (Eds.). (2017). Mediated Intimacies: Connectivities, Relationalities and Proximities (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208589
Ardèvol, E., & Gómez-Cruz, E. (2012). Cuerpo privado, imagen pública: El autorretrato en la práctica de la fotografía digital [Private body, public image: The self-portrait in the practice of digital photography]. Revista de dialectología y tradiciones populares, (67) 181–208.
Arendt, Hannah (2001). A Condição Humana [The Human Condition]. Relógio d’Água.
Ariès, P., Duby, G., & Mazal, H. (1987). A history of private life. Press of Harvard University Press.
Baker, J. R., & Moore, S. M. (2008). Distress, coping, and blogging: Comparing new MySpace users by their intention to blog. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 11(1), 81-85.
Barker, M.J., Gill, R., & Harvey, L. (2018). Mediated intimacy: Sex advice in media culture. Sexualities, 21(8), 1337-1345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718781342
Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 281–288.
Bazarova, N. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 815–832.
Brodin, O., & Magnier, L. (2012). Le développement d’un index d’exposition de soi dans les médias sociaux: phase exploratoire d’identification des indicateurs constitutifs. Management & Avenir, (58), 144-168. https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.058.0144
Bucher, T. (2012). The friendship assemblage: Investigating programmed sociality on Facebook, Television & New Media,14(6), 479–493.
Cabalquinto, E. C. (2018). Ambivalent intimacies: entangled pains and gains through Facebook use in transnational family life. In A. S. Dobson, N. Carah & B. Robards (Eds.), Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media (pp. 247–263). Springer.
Cervi, D. L., & Marín-Lladó, D. C. (2022). La privacidad, un desafío para periodistas y comunicadores. Análisis de la privacidad en los estudios universitarios de comunicación de Europa y Estados Unidos. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, (55), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.08
Chambers, D. (2017). Networked intimacy: Algorithmic friendship and scalable sociality. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 26–36.
David, G., & Cambre, C. (2016). Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641976
Dobson, A. S., Carah, N., & Robards, B. (Eds.) (2018). Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media. Palgrave Macmillan.
Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public Displays of Connection. BT Technology Journal, (22), 71–82.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media and Society, (13), 873-892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389
Gervasoni, T. A., Bolesina, I., & Dias, F. V. (2022). The Right to Extimacy and the Technological-Neoliberal Social Control. Opinión Jurídica, 21(46 (special)), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v21n46a1
Hjorth, L., & Lim, S. (2012). Mobile intimacy in an age of affective mobile media. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4), 477-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741860
Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Pink, S., Zhou, B., Kato, F., Bell, G., Ohashi, K., Marmo, C., & Xiao, M. (2016). Digital kinships: Intergenerational locative media in Tokyo, Shanghai and Melbourne. In L. Hjorth & O. Khoo (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of New Media in Asia (pp. 251-262). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774626
Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science. Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893
Hsu, C. W., Wang, C. C., & Yi-Ting, T. (2011). The closer the relationship, the more the interaction on Facebook? Investigating the case of Taiwan users. Cyberpsychology. Behavior, and Social Networking, 4(7-8), 473-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0267
Jamieson, L. (2012). Intimacy as a concept: Explaining social change in the context of globalisation or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online. 16(4). 151-163, https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2497
Kaplan, D. (2021). Public intimacy in social media: The mass audience as a third party. Media, Culture & Society, 43(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443721991087
Keightley, E., & Reading, A. (2014). Mediated mobilities. Media Culture & Society, (36), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437135177
Kim, J., & Lee, J. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0374
Klein, A. (2010). Entre Médiation et Médiatisation, Dynamiques Identitaires en Jeu Dans les Dispositifs d’Autopublication sur Internet. Journal for Communication Studies. ESSACHESS, 3(6), 147-161.
Lambert, A. (2016). Intimacy and social capital on Facebook: Beyond the psychological perspective. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2559–2575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815588902
Lásen, A. (2015). Digital Self-Portraits, Exposure and the Modulation of Intimacy. In J. R. Carvalheiro & A. S. Tellería (Eds.), Mobile and digital communication: approaches to public and private (pp. 61-78). Labcom Books.
Lash, C. (1991). Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. W. W. Norton & Company.
Lomborg, S. (2013). Social media, social genres: Making sense of the ordinary. Routledge.
Licoppe, C. (2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone. In J. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of communication technology (pp. 171–186).Transaction Publishers.
Lipovetsky, G. (1989). A Era do Vazio. Relógio d’Água.
Malik, A., Dhir, A., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on Facebook. Telematics and Informatics, (33), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.009
Manning, J. (2014). Social media, definition and classes of. In K. Harvey (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social media and politics (pp. 1158-1162). Thousand Oaks. Sage.
Martinot D. (2008). Le soi, les autres et la société. PUG
Mateus, S. (2010). Public Intimacy. Sphera Publica- revista de ciencias sociales y de la comunicación, (10), 57–70.
Mateus, S. (2018). Affective Rhetoric- what is it and why it matters. In C. Clark, & L. Zhang (Eds.), Affect, Emotion, and Rhetorical Persuasion in Mass Communication (pp. 69-80). Routledge.
Mateus, S. (2024). O Fim da Esfera pública e a Nova Teoria da Publicidade- lições de comunicação política. Pimenta Cultural.
Mehl, D. (1996). La Télévision de l’Intimité. Seuil.
Mendelson, E. A. (2023). Sensemaking and public intimacy on TikTok: How viral videos influence interpersonal relationships offline. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231163231
Miguel, C. (2016). Researching intimacy through social media: a cross-platform approach. MedieKultur, (60), 50-69.
Miller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387–400.
Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, F., & LaRose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction.
Oswald, D. L., & Clark, E. M. (2006). How do friendship maintenance behaviors and problem-solving styles function at the individual and dyadic levels? Personal Relationships, (13), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00121.x
Pasquali Falchi, M. do C. (2023). Midiatização e o processo de extimidade de pacientes com Síndrome de Turner nas plataformas digitais. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud, 14(2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2023.7212
Pedroni, M., Pasquali, F., & Carlo, S. (2014). My friends are my audience: Mass-mediation of personal content and relations in Facebook. Observatorio (OBS)*, (8), 97–113.
Pedruzzi, P., Medeiros de Almeida, I., Matos, F., & Andrade, A. (2021). Social Media Motivations Scale (SMM-S): Measure Adaptation and Predictors. Liberabit, 27(2). 2223-7666 https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2021.v27n2.04
Pollet, T., Roberts, S. B. G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, (14), 253-258.
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked Individualism: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MIT press.
Rojek, C. (2015). Presumed intimacy: Parasocial interaction in media, society and celebrity culture. Oxford, Polity Press.
Sandoval Martín, M.T. (2000). La Red: el nuevo mercado de la vida privada. Ambitos: Revista internacional de comunicación, (5), 143-155.
Schandorf, M. (2019). Communication as Gesture: Media(tion), Meaning, & Movement. Emerald Publishing.
Sennett, R. (1974). The Fall Of Public Man. WW Norton & Company.
Sennett, R. (1992). The Conscience of the Eye- the design and social life of cities. WW Norton & Company.
Sutcliffe, A. G., Binder, J. F., & Dunbar, R. (2018). Activity in social media and intimacy in social relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, (85), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.050
Tisseron, S. (2003). L’Intimité surexposée. Hachette Litterature.
Tisseron, S. (2008). Virtual, mon amour – Penser, aimer, souffrir à l´ère des nouvelles technologies. Albin Miche.
Van House, N. A. (2007). Flickr and public image-sharing: Distant closeness and photo exhibition. In CH’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 28 April–3 May 2007 (pp. 2717–2722). ACM.
Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., & Bunyan, M. (2005). Mediating intimacy: Designing technologies to support strong-tie relations. IN W. Kellogg, S. Zhai, C. Gale and G. Veer (eds.) Proceedings of ‘Technology, safety, community’, the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘05), Portland, Oregon, United States, 02–07 April 2005 (471–480). https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055038
Wang, V., Tucker, J. V., & Haines, K. (2012). Phatic Technologies in Modern Society. Technology in Society, (34), 84-93.
Watson, A., Lupton, D., & Michael, M. (2021). Enacting intimacy and sociality at a distance in the COVID-19 crisis: the sociomaterialities of home-based communication technologies. Media International Australia, 178(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20961568
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Samuel Mateus
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación é um jornal de acesso aberto, o que significa que todo o conteúdo está disponível gratuitamente para o usuário ou sua instituição. Os usuários podem ler, baixar, copiar, distribuir, distribuir, imprimir, pesquisar ou vincular ao texto completo dos artigos, ou utilizá-los para qualquer outra finalidade lícita, sem solicitar permissão prévia da editora ou do autor. Esta definição de acesso aberto está de acordo com a Iniciativa de Acesso Aberto de Budapeste (BOAI).
A menos que seja observado o contrário, todo o conteúdo da edição eletrônica é distribuído sob uma "Licença Internacional Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0". Você pode consultar a versão informativa e o texto legal da licença aqui. Isto deve ser expressamente declarado desta forma, quando necessário.
No caso de aceitação do manuscrito, os autores cedem os direitos da obra para sua publicação à Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación sob o contrato de licença Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Os autores retêm os direitos autorais e terceiros estão autorizados a copiar, distribuir e fazer uso da obra, desde que cumpram os termos e condições estabelecidos na licença
- Cite a autoria e a fonte original de publicação (revista, editora e URL da obra).
- Não utilizá-los para fins comerciais.
- Se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você deve liberar suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original.
Mais informações podem ser encontradas em
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
- Resumo 90
- PDF (Español (España)) 58
- HTML (Español (España)) 14
