Christopher Day
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.1992.i17.06Abstract
Lawrence Stenhouse, así como su seguidor John Elliott, son autores británicos ya clásicos en el panorama de las referencias bibliográficas en cualquier trabajo que se precie de ser renovador y alternativo en relación con cuestiones curriculares, de investigación en el aula, deformación de profesores investigadores, etc. Sin embargo, ésta es una línea de trabajo que aún sigue aportando profesionales muy valiosos en la actualidad. Es el caso de Christopher W. Day, catedrático de la School of Education de la Universidad de Nottingham (Reino Unido), quien desempeña el cargo de Secretario General de la Asociación Internacional para el Estudio del Pensamiento del Profesor (ISATT) y es miembro del comité de dirección de la Asociación para la Investigación-Acción en las Aulas (CARN). El interés de sus numerosas publicaciones, aún poco conocidas en nuestro país, le perfilan como sucesor del trabajo iniciado por los maestros antes mencionados. Con esta entrevista, realizada en La Rábida (Huelva) el pasado mes de julio, con motivo del Seminario-Debate sobre el Proyecto Curricular IRES, pretendemos facilitar el acceso a sus ideas y planteamientos didácticos.
Downloads
References
DAY, Ch. W. (1983). Teachers’ Thinking - Intentions and Practice: An Action Research Perspective. En Halkes, P. & Olson, J.K. Teacher Thinking: a new Perspective on Persisting Problems in Education. Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger.
DAY, Ch.W. (1985). Why teachers' change their thinking and behaviour: case studies in professional learning through in-service activity. Comunicación presentada a la I Conferencia de la ISATT. The Netherlands.
DAY, Ch.W. (1987). Professional Learning through Collaborative In-Service Activity. En: Smith, J.: Educating Teachers Changing the Nature of Pedagogical Knowledge. London, The Falmer Press.
DAY, Ch.W., POPE, M. & DENICOLO, P. (Eds.)(1990). Insight into Teachers’Thinking and Practice. London, The Falmer Press.
DAY, Ch.W. (1991). Promoting teachers- professional development: a pilot project for primary schools. En: Bell, L. & Day, Ch. (eds.) Managing the Professional Development of Teachers. OU Press Milton Keynes, Philadelphia.
DAY, Ch.W. (1991). Roles and Relationships in Qualitative Research on Teachers’Thinking: A Reconsideration. Teaching and Teacher Education, v.7, n. 5/6.
DAY, Ch.W. Reflection: a necessary but not sufficient condition for professional development. British Journal of Educational Research. (En prensa, enero 1993).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Investigaci´ón en la Escuela
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published work, provided that proper acknowledgement is given; the authorship of the work and first publication in AVANCES are mentioned; the material is not used for commercial purposes; and, if you create other material from the original material (e.g. a translation), you must distribute your contribution under this same licence as the original.
- Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2019-03-27
Published 2021-05-09
- Abstract 75
- PDF (Español (España)) 43