Analysis of reflexivity and its impact on teacher education
Analysis of reflexivity and its impact on teacher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2024.25499Keywords:
Initial teacher education, reflectivity, professional development, teacher, higher education, quantitative methodology, personal development, tutorial actionAbstract
Generating internal reflective processes in teacher education offers the opportunity to develop personal enrichment strategies aimed at educational improvement and teacher professional development. Purpose of this study is to find out to what extent the personal reflection of future teachers is promoted and developed by the action of the academic tutor at the university. Methodology used is quantitative (descriptive-correlational) through the application of a questionnaire called "Bases for the development of a model of tutorial action oriented towards the reflective practice of education teachers". Analysis process focuses on the Personal Reflexivity dimension, consisting of 15 items with a five-point Likert-type scale. Sample was made up of 376 students belonging to the Primary Education Degree at the University of Granada (Spain) and the General Basic Education Degree at the Catholic University of Maule (Chile). One of the most important results expresses that it is essential that the action of the academic tutor allows the student to develop analytical skills in schools, generating reflective processes that support decisions based on the factors that intervene in the classroom. Finally, this study concludes that future teachers must be able to reflect on personal aspects that shape their professional practice, valuing aspects related to academic education, social contribution and educational community
Downloads
References
Aguilera, J.L. (2019). La tutoría universitaria como práctica docente: fundamentos y métodos para el desarrollo de planes de acción tutorial en la universidad. Pro-Posições, (30), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-6248-2017-0038
Alonso-García, S., Rodríguez-García, A.M. y Cáceres-Reche, M.P. (2018). Análisis de la Acción Tutorial y su Incidencia en el Desarrollo Integral del Alumnado. El Caso de la Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, España. Formación Universitaria, 11(3), 63–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000300063
Baer, S. (2018). The Design-Debrief: Using Storytelling to Connect Preservice Teacher Reflection With Design-Thinking. LEARNing Landscapes, 11(2), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v11i2.947
Burgos García, A. (2011). Análisis de los sistemas de formación en prevención de riesgos laborales en los centros escolares: hacia una cultura de prevención. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 18(1), 227-254. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.18.2011.7563
Beauchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: issues emerging from a review of current literature. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.982525
Bisquerra, R. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación Educativa. Editorial La Muralla.
Calderón-Garrido, D., Gustems-Carnicer, J., Arús, M. E., Ayuste-Gonzalez, A., Batalla, A., Boix, R., Calderón-Garrido, C., Castell, J., Elgstrom, E., Fons, M., Kieling, M., Kirchner, T., Martín, C., Oporto, M., Oriola, S., Torres, A. y Wilson, A. E. (2019). Engagement project: Elements for a reformulation of the Tutorial Action Plan of the Teacher Training degrees at the University of Barcelona. Cultura y Educacion, 31(1), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2018.1551652
Correa, E., Chaubet, P., Collin, S. y Gervais, C. (2014). Desafíos metodológicos para el estudio de la reflexión en contexto de formación docente. Estudios Pedagógicos, 40(Especial), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07052014000200005
CRUE (2021). Universidad 2030: Propuesta para el debate. CRUE Universidades Españolas. Recuperado de: https://www.crue.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/11/CRUE_UNIVERSIDAD2030_VERSION-DIGITAL.pdf
Derobertmasure, A., y Dehon, A. (2012). Double lecture de l’action: des gestes professionnels à la rétroaction. Phronesis, 1(2), 24–44. http://www.erudit.org/revue/phro/2012/v1/n2/1009058ar.pdf
De Pro Bueno, A., De Pro Chereguini, C., y Cantó Doménech, J. (2022). Cinco problemas en la formación de maestros y maestras para enseñar ciencias en Educación Primaria. Revista interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado. Continuación de la antigua revista de escuelas normales, 97(36.1). https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v97i36.1.92510
Chen, Z., y Chen, R. (2022). exploring the key influencing factors on teachers’ reflective practice skill for sustainable learning: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811630
Expósito López, J., Chacón-Cuberos, R., Parra-González, M. E., Aguaded-Ramírez, E. M., y Conde Lacárcel, A. (2020). Tutorial action and emotional development of students as elements of improved development and preventing problems related with coexistence and social aspects. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(2), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10020045
García Nieto, N. (2008). La función tutorial de la Universidad en el actual contexto de la Educación Superior. Revista interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado, 22(1), 21–48.
Gkonou, C. y Miller, E.R. (2020). An Exploration of Language Teacher Reflection, Emotion Labor, and Emotional Capital. TESOL Quarterly, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.580
Guerrero-Ramírez, J., Fuster-Guillén, D., Gálvez-Suarez, E., Ocaña-Fernández, Y. y Aguinaga-Villegas, D. (2019). Componentes predominantes de la acción tutorial en estudiantes universitarios. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(2), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.300
Hernández Sampieri, Baptista Lucio, P., Fernández Collado, C., y Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6a ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hernández-Sampieri, R. y Mendoza, C. (2018) Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativas, cualitativa y mixta. McGrawHill, Nueva York.
Jiménez, D. (2019). El maestro reflexivo, una postura abierta a la acción para el cambio. Revista Educación y Ciudad, 2(37), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.36737/01230425.v2.n37.2019.2152
Korthagen, F.A.J. (2017). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.002
Lamb, P. y Aldous, D. (2016). Exploring the relationship between reflexivity and reflective practice through lesson study within initial teacher education. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-11-2015-0040
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). a quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lizana-Verdugo, A. & Burgos-García, A. (2022). El estudio de la práctica reflexiva y la labor tutorial en el proceso de formación docente. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 25(2), 93-112.
Liu, K., y Ball, A. F. (2019). Critical reflection and generativity: toward a framework of transformative teacher education for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 68–105. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18822806
Marqués Rosa, M.D.L.L., Molina Hernández, F.G., Gómez Nocetti, V.D.L., y Angulo Carmona, M.B. (2021). A sistematization of the reflective practice between teacher and critical friend. Estudios Pedagógicos, 47(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052021000200137
Martínez Clares, P., Pérez Cusó, J. y Martínez Juárez, M. (2016). Las TICS y el entorno virtual para la tutoría universitaria. Educacion XX1, 19(1), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.13942
Martínez Valdivia, E., Pegalajar Palomino, M.C., & Burgos García, A. (2023). Metodologías Activas para el Desarrollo Sostenible en la Formación Docente. Análisis Bibliométrico. Revista Internacional De Educación Para La Justicia Social, 12(2), 191–211.
Pacheco, C. (2013). La reflexión docente: eje para promover el cambio representacional de concepciones y prácticas en los docentes. Zona Próxima: Revista Del Instituto de Estudios Superiores En Educación, 19, 107–118. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6416682
Pérez-García, M. (2005). ¿Se pueden determinar las funciones del supervisor universitario? Revista de Investigación Educativa, RIE, 23(2), 315–332.
Ramón, R. (2018). Las teorías de Schön y Dewey: hacia un modelo de reflexión en la práctica docente. Cinzontle, Revista de Divulgación y Difusión Cultural, 2(11), 27–32. https://revistas.ujat.mx/index.php/Cinzontle/article/view/2456
Rivas, H., Vásquez, C. y Pincheira, N. (2017). Análisis de un proceso de práctica profesional orientado a la reflexión docente. Actas Del Segundo Congreso International Virtual Sobre El Enfoque Ontosemiótico Del Conocimiento y La Instrucción Matemáticos., 1–10. enfoqueontosemiotico.ugr.es/civeos.html
Ruffinelli, A., De la Hoz, S. y Álvarez, C. (2020). Practicum tutorials in initial teacher training: conditions, strategies, and effects of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 21(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1708712
Tajeddin, Z. y Aghababazadeh, Y. (2018). Blog-Mediated Reflection for Professional Development: Exploring Themes and Criticality of L2 Teachers’ Reflective Practice. TESL Canada Journal, 35(2), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v35i2.1289
Tristán-López, A. (2008). Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen cuantitativo de la validez de contenido de un instrumento objetivo. Avances en medición, 6(1), 37-48.
UNESCO. (2018). Avances en la educación para el desarrollo sostenible y la educación para la ciudadanía mundial. Paris, Francia: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000266176_spa?posInSet=1&queryId=56e66126-33e0-4c4b-b491-85968586ac15
United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Recuperado de: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Antonio Burgos-García, Alexis Lizana-Verdugo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
Authors conserve the copyrights and cede to the journal the right for first publication, with the work registered with the attribution licence of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published work as long as they mention the authorship and the first publication in this journal.
The authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g. include it an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
Authors are allowed and indeed recommended to publish their work on the internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the revision and publication process, because it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
