Televisión y diversidad génesis, definiciones y perspectivas de la diversidad en las televisiones públicas y comerciales
Keywords:
Televisión, Diversidad, Perspectivas, Medios de ComunicaciónAbstract
Este artículo presenta un análisis de la génesis del valor de la diversidad dentro de los medios de comunicación, y especialmente en las televisiones públicas y comerciales, de los elementos más significativos que se encuentran planteados en el debate sobre la diversidad en algunos países desarrollados, y algunas de las definiciones que se han elaborado sobre este concepto. También, en este artículo se analiza las principales perspectivas de investigación sobre las dimensiones de la diversidad y la importancia que tiene este valor en la actual era multicanal, en relación, especialmente con el futuro de las televisiones públicas.Downloads
References
- ADAMS W.J y WAKSHLAG, J, (1985): "Trends in Program Variety and the Prime Time Access Rule», Journal of Broadcasting, Vol.29, no1, pp. 23-34.
- BLUMLER, Jay. G, (1989):The Rol of Public Policy in the New Television Marketplace,
- BENTON, Fondation, Washington D.C.
(1990): «Elections, the Media and the Modern Publicity Process», en FER- GUSON, MARJORIE (ed), Public Com-munication: the New Imperatives, Sage, London/Newbury Park/New Delhi, pp. 101-113.
(1991a): «Television in the United States: Funding Sources and Programming Consequences» en, BLUMLER, JAY.G y NOSSITER, Thomas Johnson (eds), Broadcasting Finance in Transition. A Comparative Handbook, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp. 41-94.
(1991b): «In Pursuit of Programme Range and Quality», Studies on Broadcasting, Theoretical Research Center, NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute, Tokio.
(1992a): «Introducción: Confrontaciones actuales en la televisión de Europa Occidental», en BLUMLER, Jay.G (ed), Televisión e Interés Público, Bosch, Barcelona, pp. 11-17.
(1992b): «La televisión pública ante el diluvio comercial», en BLUMLER, Jay.G, Televisión e Interés público, Bosch, Barcelona, pp. 21-38.
(1992c): «Los valores vulnerables en juego», en BLUMLER, Jay. G (ed), Televisión e Interés público, Bosch, Barcelona, pp. 39-63.
- BLUMLER, Jay. G, BRIYNIN, MALCOLM y NOSSITER, Thomas Johnson, 1986, «Broadcasting Finance and Programme Quality: an International Review», European Journal of Communication, Vol.1, No3, pp. 343-364, Routledge, London.
- BROADCASTING RESEARCH UNIT, 1985, The Public Service Idea in British Broadcasting: Main Principles, Broadcasting Research Unit, London. (1989): Quality in Television: Programmes, Programmemakers, Systems, John Libbey, London/París.
- COSTA BADIA, Pere Oriol, (1986): La crisis de la televisión pública, Paidós, Barcelona.
- DAHL, R.A, (1967: Pluralist Democracy in the US: Conflict and Consent, Rand McNally, Chicago.
- DOMINICK, J.R y PEARCE, M.C, (1976): «Trends in Network Primetime Programming», Journal of Communication, Winter, vol.26, No1.
- FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION, 1946, Blue Public, Service Responsabilities of Broadcasting Licenses, FCC, Washington DC.
- HOFFMANN-RIEM, Wolfgang, (1981a): Kommerzielles Fersehen: Run- dfunkfreiheit zwischen okonomischer Nutzung und staatlicher Regelungsve- rantwortung: das Beispiel, Nomos, Baden-Baden.
(1981b): «The Freedom of Communication and the Future of Broadcasting in West Germany», Studies of Broadcasting, No17, pp.49-70.
(1987): «National Identity and Cultural Values: Broadcasting Safeguards», Journal of Broadcasting, No 31, pp. 57-72.
(1992a): «La protección de valores vulnerables en el ordenamiento televisivo alemán, en BLUMLER, Jay. G, Televisión e Interés público, Bosch, Barcelona, pp. 67-87.
(1992b): La defensa de valores vulnerables: medidas reguladoras y problemas de aplicación», en BLUMLER, Jay.G, Televisión e Interés Público, pp. 223- 256.
- HEETER, Carrie, (1988): “The Choice Process Model”, en HEETER, C y GREENBERG (eds), Cable Viewing, Ablex, Norwood, Ablex.
- ISHIKA W A, Sakae, (1996): «The rol and function of public service broadcasting in a multichannel media environment», The Public/Javnost, Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, vol. III, No 2, pp. 97-107, Ljubljana (Eslovenia), University Luton Press.
- Jacklin, P, (1978): "Representative Diversity", Journal of Communication, No28, pp.85-88.
- KIRCHE UND RUNDFUNK, (1986): No 88. Litman, Barry. R, 1979,»The Television Networks, Competition and Program Diversity», Journal of Broadcasting, vol. 23, Primavera, pp. 393-409.
(1992): «Economics Aspects of Program Quality: the Case for Diversity», Studies on Broadcasting, Theoretical Research Center, NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute, Tokio.
- MCQUAIL, Denis, (1991): "Broadcasting Structure and Finance: the Netherland", en BLUMLER, Jay.G y NOSSITER, Thomas. J (eds), Broadcasting Finance in Transition. A Comparative Handbook, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp. 144-157.
(1992): Media performance: mass communication and the public interest, Sage, London.
(1992b): «Los Países Bajos: libertad y diversidad bajo condiciones de variedad de canales», en Blumler, Jay. G (ed), Televisión e Interés Público, Bosch, Barcelona, pp. 131 148.
- Mcquail, Denis y VAN CUILENBURG, Jan.J, (1983): «Diversity as a Media Policy Goal: a Strategy for Evaluative Research and a Netherlans Case Study», Gazette, No 31, pp. 145 162.
- NOWAK, Kjell, (1991): “Television in Sweden 1986: Position and Prospects”, en Broadcasting Finance in Transition: a Comparative Handbook, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp. 235-259.
- OWEN, B.M, (1977): «Regulating Diversity: the Case of Radio Format», Journal of Broadcasting, Verano, Vol.21, No 3, pp. 305-319.
- SONNENBERG, Urte, (1993): “Channel Multiplicity and Programme Diver- sity in Television: Two Sides of tge Same Coin?”, Stuidies of Broadcasting no 29, pp. 71-92.
- TUMIN, M.M, y PLOTCH, W (eds), (1977): Pluralism in a Democratic Society, Praeger, New York.
- Veljanovski, Cveto (de), (1989): Freedom in Broadcasting, Institute of Economics Affairs, London.
- WOBER, J.M, (1988): The Use and Abuse of Television, Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Hillsdale, N.J.
(1989): «The UK: the Constancy of audience Behavior», en BECKER, I.B, et al (eds), Audience Response to Media Diversification, Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Hillsdale, N.J. 1990,The Assesment of Television, IBA, Research Paper, Julio, London.
- WOBER, J.M y KILPATRIC, E, 1988, The Cost of Choice: a Calculus of Programme Want, Variety and Waste, IBA, Paper, Marzo, London.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available at no charge to the user or their institution. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author. This definition of open access is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI).
Unless otherwise noted, all content in the electronic edition is distributed under a "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License". You can consult the informative version and legal text of the licence here. This should be expressly stated in this way where necessary.
In case of acceptance of the manuscript, the authors cede the rights of the work for its publication to Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license contract (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The authors retain copyright and third parties are authorised to copy, distribute and make use of the work, provided they comply with the terms and conditions set out in the licence
- Cite the authorship and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work).
- Do not use them for commercial purposes.
- If you remix, transform or create from the material, you must release your contributions under the same license as the original.
More information can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
