Androcentrism and conservatism within climate obstructionism. The case of the think tank CLINTEL in The Netherlands

Mayte Moreno-Soldevila

doi:10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.03

Autores

Mayte Moreno-Soldevila Universidad de Groningen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6951-8703

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i55.03

Palavras-chave:

climate crisis, think tanks, denialism, gender, neoliberalism

Resumo

Within the climate countermovement, neoliberal think tanks have played a predominant role in both the United States and Europe. There are links between climate obstructionism and ideologies such as conservatism and the extreme right; androcentrism, patriarchal worldviews and industrial masculinities, and whiteness and xenosceptic ideologies. This research takes as a case study the Dutch think tank CLINTEL, which, despite having been founded in 2019, has managed to get a declaration against the climate emergency to members of the European Parliament, which has been signed by climate action contrarians from all over the world. This paper analyses the contrarian framings present in this declaration based on the typology established by Almiron et al. (2020). In addition, this research makes a gendered discursive analysis of the discussion about this statement in a forum of the European Parliament, where CLINTEL met with members of the far-right Dutch party Forum van Democratie (FvD), part of the European Conservatives and Reformists group. The study on CLINTEL's statement shows that the think tank uses similar frames as other European denialist think tanks. Its climate declaration has a significant gender bias, with an overwhelming over-representation of men among the signatories. This, together with the discursive analysis of its discussion with members of the European Parliament, is a contribution to the emerging line of research on industrial masculinities and climate change obstructionism. This paper provides information on the think tank CLINTEL, helping to fill a knowledge gap on the climate change countermovement in the Netherlands.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##

Carregando Métricas ...

Referências

Abelson, D. E. (2018). Do think tanks matter?: Assessing the impact of public policy institutes (3rd ed.). McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Almiron, N. (2016). Think tanks y neoliberalismo. In F. Sierra Caballero & F. Maniglio (Eds.), Capitalismo financiero y comunicación (pp. 195–220). Ediciones Ciespal.

Almiron, N. (2017). Favoring the elites: Think tanks and discourse coalitions. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4350–4369.

Almiron, N., & Xifra, J. (2020). Climate change denial and public relations. Strategic communication and interest groups in climate inaction. Routledge.

Almiron, N., Boykoff, M., Narberhaus, M., & Heras, F. (2020). Dominant counter-frames in influential climate contrarian European think tanks. Climatic Change, 162(4), 2003–2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02820-4

Almiron, N., & Moreno, J. A. (2021). Think tanks neoliberales y falsos debates: La propuesta del impuesto a la carne para combatir la crisis climática [Neoliberal think tanks and false debates: The meat tax proposal to combat the climate crisis]. In D. Rodrigo-Cano, R. Mancinas-Chávez, & R. Fernández-Reyes (Eds.), La comunicación del cambio climático, una herramienta ante el gran desafío (pp. 222–248). Dykinson. https://bit.ly/321QzJY

Anshelm, J., & Hultman, M. (2014). A green fatwā? Climate change as a threat to the masculinity of industrial modernity. Norma, 9(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2014.908627

Beder, S. (2001) Research note - Neoliberal Think Tanks and Free Market Environmentalism, Environmental Politics, 10(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000530

Brulle, Robert J. 2014. Institutionalizing Delay: Foundation Funding and the Creation of U.S. Climate Change Counter-Movement Organizations. Climatic Change, 122(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7

BBC (2021, May 26). Shell: Netherlands court orders oil giant to cut emissions. BBC. https://bbc.in/30vPIBa

Buranyi, Stephen (2020, May 20). Climate action under duress: how Dutch were forced into emissions cuts. The Guardian. https://bit.ly/31XGyOj

Cook, J., Ellerton, P., & Kinkead, D. (2018). Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 024018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f

Crok, M. (2019, November 23). European Parliament told: There is no climate emergency. CLINTEL. https://bit.ly/3GK7ccw

Daggett, C. (2018). Petro-masculinity: Fossil fuels and authoritarian desire. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 47(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829818775817

European Investment Bank (2021). Majority (62%) of Dutch people think their country will fail to drastically reduce carbon emissions by 2050. European Investment Bank. https://bit.ly/31P9Vm9

Fischer, A., Brands, C., & Abadi, D. (2020). The Expression of Right-Wing Populism in the Netherlands across Facebook Posts [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/35puf

Hofkens, A., & van der Waal, W. (2020). Klimaatsceptisch rapport Clintel krijgt geen steun van klimaatonderzoek [Climate skeptical report Clintel gets no support from climate research]. Pointer. https://bit.ly/3dOg8ku

Hultman, M., Björk, A., & Viinikka, T. (2019). The Far Right and Climate Change Denial. In B. Forchtner (Ed.), The Far Right and the Environment (pp. 121–135). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351104043-8

Hultman, M., Pulé, P. M. (2019). Ecological Masculinities: Theoretical foundations and practical guidance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315195223

IPCC (2018). Special Report Global Warming of 1.5 °C. IPCC. https://bit.ly/3IZZexQ

Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802055576

Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(3), 465–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x

Keulemans, M. (2018, February 28). De klimaatjournalist die in de ban van het tegengeluid raakte: ‘Ik ben een roepende in de woestijn geworden’ [The climate journalist who fell under the spell of dissent: ‘I have become a voice in the wilderness’]. deVolkskrant. https://bit.ly/3DVZ5rt

Krange, O., Kaltenborn, B. P., & Hultman, M. (2019). Cool dudes in Norway: Climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men. Environmental Sociology, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1488516

Kulin, J., Johansson Sevä, I., & Dunlap, R. E. (2021). Nationalist ideology, rightwing populism, and public views about climate change in Europe. Environmental Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1898879

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2015). Climate change in the American mind: March, 2015. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. https://bit.ly/3m6TNDs

LeGreco, M. (2014). Discourse analysis. In J. Mills & M. Birks (Eds.) Qualitative methodology, (pp. 67–88). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473920163

Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411

Lynas, M., Houlton, B. Z., & Perry, S. (2021). Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 16(11), 114005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966

McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003

Mercado-Sáez, M.-T., Marco-Crespo, E., & Álvarez-Villa, À. (2019). Exploring news frames, sources and editorial lines on newspaper coverage of nuclear energy in Spain. Environmental Communication, 13(4), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1435558

Moreno, J. A., & Almiron, N. (2021). Representación en la prensa española del papel de la agricultura animal en la crisis climática: Falta de visibilidad y carnismo [Representation of the role of animal agriculture in the climate crisis in the Spanish press: Lack of visibility and carnism]. Estudios Sobre El Mensaje Periodístico, 27(1), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.73745

Nelson, T., Clawson, R., & Oxley, Z. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567-583. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952075

OECD (n.d.). Climate change: Consequences of inaction. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://bit.ly/31Pm9LD

Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of Doubt. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Pelser, B. (2021). World Climate Declaration. CLINTEL. https://bit.ly/3sldP11

Piltz, R. (2008). ‘The Denial Machine’. Index on Censorship, 37(4), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03064220802561366

Plehwe, D. (2014). Think tank networks and the knowledge–interest nexus: The case of climate change. Critical Policy Studies, 8(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.883859

Plehwe, D. (2021). Think tanks and the politics of climate change. In D. Abelson & C. Rastrick (Eds.) Handbook on Think Tanks in Public Policy, (pp. 150–165). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901849.00022

Van der Wel, R. (2019). Strategies of climate change denial: The case of Thierry Baudet. MaRBLe, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.26481/marble.2019.v1.750