Can iMOOCs close the Opportunity Gaps?: the contribution of social inclusive pedagogical design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2019.v21.i2.08Palabras clave:
distance education, open learning systems, online learning, equal opportunity in education, education for all.Resumen
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are open courses made available online at no cost to the user and designed to scale up, allowing for a large number of participants. As such, they are a disruptive new development which has the potential to widen access to higher education since they contribute to social inclusion, the dissemination of knowledge and pedagogical innovation. However, assuring quality learning opportunities to all cannot be simply reduced to allowing free access to higher education. On the contrary, it implies assuring equitable opportunities for every participant to succeed in their learning experience. This goal depends on the quality of the learning design. To be successful, a massive open online learning experience has to empower learners and to facilitate a networked learning environment. In fact, MOOCs are designed to serve a high heterogeneity of profiles, with many differences regarding learning needs and preferences, prior knowledge, contexts of participation and diversity of online platforms. Personalization can play a key role in this process. In this article, the authors describe the iMOOC pedagogical model and its later derivative, the sMOOC model, and explain how they contributed to the introduction of the principles of diversity and equity to MOOC design, allowing for a clear differentiation of learning paths and also of virtual environments, while empowering participants to succeed in their learning experiences. Using a design-based research approach, a comparative analysis of two course iterations each representing each model is also presented and discussed.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Cormier, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Proposal for a Conceptual Framework forEducators to Describe and Design MOOCs. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(1), 6-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-020-01-0006.
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., &Seaton, D. T.(2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC. Research &Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25. Retrieved from: Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2Mn8yjG.
Brouns, F., Teixeira, A., Morgado, L., Fano, S., Fueyo, A. & Jansen, D. (2016). Designing massive open online learning processes: The sMOOC pedagogical framework. In M. Jemni, Kinshuk & M. K Khribi (Eds.), Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs(pp. 315-336). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Brouns, F., Mota, J., Morgado, L., Jansen, D., Fano, S., Silva, A., & Teixeira, A. (2014). A networked learning framework for effective MOOC design: the ECO project approach. In A. Teixeira y A. Szücs (Eds.), 8th EDEN Research Workshop: Challenges for research into open & distance learning: doing things better: doing better things(pp. 161-171). Budapest: EDEN. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2Eglzah.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Schauble, L., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.DOI: http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009.
Cobo, C. (2016) La Innovación Pendiente. Reflexiones (y Provocaciones) sobre educación, tecnología y conocimiento. Colección Fundación Ceibal.Coelho, J., Teixeira, A., Nicolau, P., Caeiro, S., & Rocio, V. (2015). iMOOC on Climate Change: Evaluation ofa Massive Open Online Learning Pilot Experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). Doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2160
Conole, G. G.(2015). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación aDistancia, 39. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2SiGvpj.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal Of Interactive Media In Education, 3(0). Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2tmnHuT.
Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., & Caballé, S. (2013). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. Proceedings of the 2013 Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC).
Downes, S. (2012). Creating the Connectivist Course. [Blog post]. Half an hour. January 6, 2012. Retrieve from: https://bit.ly/2El1yiE.
EADTU (2015). Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe. EADTU. Fev. 2015. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2RUhWPm.
Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Sitlia, H. (2011). The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
Fueyo, A., Fano, S., Callejo, J., Brouns, F., Gutiérrez, A., Bossu, A., et al. (2015). D4.3 Report on users satisfaction. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Gil-Jaurena, I., Callejo-Gallego, M., & Agudo-Arroyo, Y. (2017). Evaluation of the UNED MOOCs implementation: demographics, learners’ opinions and completion rates. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 141-168. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3155
Guàrdia, L., Maina, M., & Sangrà, A. (2013). MOOC Design Principles. A Pedagogical Approach from the Learner’s Perspective. eLearning Papers, 33, 1-6. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/36zIIAu.
Gutiérrez-Rojas, I., Crespo-García, R. M., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Adapting an Awareness Tool for Massive Courses: the Case of ClassON. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(1), 24-38. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2ZrVG0Y.
Hill, P. (2012). Four Barriers that MOOCs must overcome to builda sustainable model [Blog post].e-Literate. July 24, 2012. Retrievedfrom: https://bit.ly/2RQWXNf.
Holton, D. (2012). What’s the “problem” with MOOCs? [Blog post]. EdTechDev. May 4, 2012. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2RV7zuC.
Jordan, K. (2013). Synthesising MOOC completion rates [Blog post]. MoocMoocher. February 13, 2013. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2LWt8qK.
Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93. DOI: http://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041.
Lambert, S. R. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014-18, Computers & Education, 145(2020), 103693. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693.
Lane, L. M. (2012). Three Kinds of MOOCs [Blog post]. Lisa's (Online) Teaching Blog. August 15, 2012. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2YMuSYW.
Morais, D., & Morgado, L. (2017). Integração e Envolvimento dos participantes em MOOCs: contributo do BootCamp. Revista De Estudios E Investigación En Psicología Y Educación, (13), 139-143.Doi:https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.13.2572.
North, S., Richardson, R., & North, M. M. (2014). To Adapt MOOCS, or Not? That is No Longer the Question. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 69-72. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020108.
Osuna, S., & Camarero, L. (2016). The ECO European Project: A New MOOC Dimension Based on an Intercreativity Environment. In TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 117-125. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/Ij49Jh.
Pereira, A., Mendes, A., Morgado, L., Amante, L. & Bidarra, J. (2008). Universidade Aberta's pedagogical model for distance education: a university for the future. Lisbon: Universidade Aberta.
Ramalheiro, M. J.; Morgado, L. (2018). Microblogging e Presença Social no Ensino Aberto Online, Dissertação do mestrado em Pedagogia do eLearning, Universidade Aberta. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/35pPiJA.
Rolfe, V. (2015). A Systematic Review of the Socio-Ethical Aspects of Massive Online Open Courses. Eurodl, 18(1). Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2YQZ70P.
Santos, O. C., Boticario, J. G., & Pérez-Marín, D. (2014). Extending web-based educational systems with personalised support through User Centred Designed recommendations along the e-learning life cycle. Science of Computer Programming, 88, 92-109. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2013.12.004.
Siemens, G. (2012a). MOOCs are really a platform. elearnsapce.July 25, 2012. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2YRNQNz.
Siemens, G. (2012b). What is the theory that underpins our moocs? [Blog post]. elearnspace. June 3, 2012. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2qSg3HB.
Siemens, G. (2010). What’s wrong with (M)OOCs? [Blog post]. elearnspace. December 19, 2010. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2RTdsbB.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2sWhCFa.
Schuwer, R., Gil Jaurena, I., Aydin, C. H., Costello, E., Dalsgaard, C., Brown, M., Jansen, D., & Teixeira, A. (2015). Opportunities and Threats of the MOOC Movement for Higher Education: The European Perspective. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). Doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2153
Teixeira, A., Miranda, B., Oliveira, I., & Pinto, M. C. (2018). MOOC “Competências digitais para professores”: uma prática formativa inovadora. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia,21(2), 243-261. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.19784
Teixeira, A., Garcia-Cabot, A., García-Lopéz, E., Mota, J., & de-Marcos, L. (2016). A new competence-based approach for personalizing MOOCs in a mobile collaborative and networked environment. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19(1),143-160. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.1.14578.
Teixeira, A., & Mota, J. (2014). A Proposal for the Methodological Design of Collaborative Language MOOCs. In E. Martín-Monje & E. Bárcena. (eds). Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries(pp. 33-47). De Gruyter Open. Retrievedfrom: https://bit.ly/2sqwYBA.
Teixeira, A., & Mota. J. (2013). Innovation and openness through MOOCs: Universidade Aberta’s pedagogical model for non-formal online courses. In M. Paulsen y A. Szűcs (Eds.). On behalf of the EDEN. Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network. Annual Conference. The Joy of Learning Enhancing Learning Experience -Improving Learning Quality(pp. 479-488). University of Oslo: Norway.
The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1) 5-8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005.
Tillema, H., Van Der Westhuizen, G., & Smith, K. (Eds). (2015). Mentoring forlearning “Climbing the Mountain”. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Unesco (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives, Unesco: Paris. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/34nQVq7.
Watters, A. (2012). Top Ed-Tech Trends of 2012: MOOCs. Hack Education. December 3, 2012.Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/36AS7rr.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, L-H; Milrad, M., Specht, M (Eds.) (2015). Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity. Springer-Verlag.
Xing, W., Chen, X., Stein, J., &Marcinkowski, M.(2016). Temporal predication of dropouts in MOOCs: Reaching the low hanging fruit through stacking generalization. Computers in human behavior, 58, 119-129.Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.007.
Descargas
Publicado
2019-12-26
Cómo citar
Moreira Teixeira, A., Mota, J., Teixeira Pinto, M. do C., & Morgado, L. (2019). Can iMOOCs close the Opportunity Gaps?: the contribution of social inclusive pedagogical design. Revista Fuentes, 21(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2019.v21.i2.08
Número
Sección
Monográfico
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Fuentes
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Revista Fuentes brinda acceso abierto inmediato a todo su contenido sobre el principio de que hacer que la investigación esté disponible de forma gratuita para el público para apoyar un mayor intercambio global del conocimiento.
De esta manera, el lector puede acceder a todos los contenidos de la revista desde el momento de la publicación sin coste ni obligación de suscripción.
Salvo indicación contraria, los artículos publicados en Revista Fuentes tienen licencia bajo el acuerdo de licencia internacional Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Los autores retienen los derechos de autor y se permite a terceros copiar, distribuir y hacer uso de los trabajos siempre que cumplan con los términos y condiciones establecidos por dicha licencia
- citar la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, deberá difundir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
Puede encontrar más información al respecto en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es.
En el caso de trabajos publicados bajo una licencia diferente a la anteriormente mencionada (CC BY-NC-ND o CC BY-NC) los autores retienen los derechos de autor, permitiéndose su copia, distribución y uso de los trabajos siempre que cumplan con los términos y condiciones de la licencia correspondiente. Puede encontrar más información al respecto en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=es.
Recibido 2019-11-22
Aceptado 2019-12-02
Publicado 2019-12-26
Aceptado 2019-12-02
Publicado 2019-12-26
Visualizaciones
- Resumen 352
- PDF 171
