Campaign Speeches and Public Acceptance in Contemporary Japan

Authors

  • Shoji Azuma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2012.v26.i01.02

Keywords:

discourse, empathy, Japanese, report-talk, rapport-talk

Abstract

This is a study of campaign speeches between two Japanese politicians during the House of Councilors (i.e., Lower House) election in the summer of 2010. Although the traditional “report-talk” on policies and issues is still em- braced by experienced politicians, a new style of “rapport-talk” has emerged in the Japanese political scene. This style of emphasizing emotion and empathy has been accepted with enthusiasm by Japanese people. This suggests that the Japanese political discourse system is in a transitional period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azuma, S. (2007). Rekidai Shushoo no gengoryoku o shindan suru. Tokyo, Kenkyusha.

Brown, R. and A. Gilman. (1960). “The pronouns of power and solidarity”. Style in

language, T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 253-276.

Brown, P. and S. Levinson (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis, An essay on the organization of experience. London, Harper and Row.

Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hall, E. (1959) (reprinted in 1976). The silent language. New York, Anchor Books.

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics, An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Ide, S. (1989). “Formal forms and discernment, neglected aspects of linguistic politeness”.. Multilingua 8, 2, 223-248.

Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

—, (2008). The political mind. Penguin Books “Jimin shikkoobu ni wakate tooyoo mo”. MAINICHI SHINBUN (‘Mainichi Newspaper’). August 22, 2010:3.

Matsumoto, Y. (1988). “Reexaminations of the universality of face”. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 4, 403-426.

—, (1989). “Politeness and conversational universals, observations from Japanese”. Multilingua 8, 2, 3, 207-221.

Miller, G.A. (1956). “The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information”. Psychological Review 63, 2, 81-97.

Reischauer, E. O. (1977). The Japanese. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press.

Shea, D., and M. Burton. (2006). Campaign craft, The strategies, tactics, and art

of political campaign management. Westport: Praeger.

“Honsha FNN goodoo choosa”. SANKEI SHINBUN (‘Sankei Newspaper’). July 20,

: 5.

“Shin-samaa, Koizumi Shinjiro”. SHUUKAN BUNSHUN (‘Weekly Bunshun’). July 22,

: 26.

Scotton, C.M. (1983). “The negotiation of identities in conversation: a theory of markedness and code choice”. International Journal of Sociology of Language 44, 115-136.

Takase, J. (2005). Buki to shite no kotoba seiji. Tokyo, Koodansha.

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand, women and men in conversation. New York, William Morrow.

—, (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Published

2012-11-15

How to Cite

Azuma, S. (2012). Campaign Speeches and Public Acceptance in Contemporary Japan. Philologia Hispalensis, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2012.v26.i01.02

Issue

Section

Articles
Views
  • Abstract 529
  • PDF (Español (España)) 52