The study of literary topoi as an area of comparative literature: the case of “murder for love”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2022.v36.i02.10Keywords:
literary topoi, comparative literature, classical reception, Eugene O’Neill, murder for loveAbstract
This article aims to examine the position of literary topoi in the field of comparative literature using Escobar (2000) and Laguna Mariscal’s (1999) definition of topoi. One of the requirements for distinguishing a topos from similar literary terms is its recurrence in literary history from the classical tradition towards modern literature. As a result, the study of literary topoi always constitutes evolution, development, and comparison. To show this in practice, we introduce “murder for love” as a literary topos and trace its development in Eugene O’Neill’s tragedies Desire Under the Elms (1924) and Mourning Becomes Electra (1931). The results of the study validate the necessity of comparison (in the sense of looking for parallel structures or syntaxes) when examining literary topoi. Consequently, when analyzing the development of “murder for love” in O’Neill’s plays, it is essential to look for its architextual relationships with classical texts, such as Medea narratives.
Downloads
References
Aguiar E Silva, V. M. de. (1972). Teoría de la literatura. Gredos.
Alexander, D. (1953). Psychological Fate in Mourning Becomes Electra. PMLA, 68(5), 923-934.
Altenburger, R. (2009). The Sword or the Needle: The Female Knight-errant (xia) in Traditional Chinese Narrative. Peter Lang.
Asselineau, R. (1958). Mourning Becomes Electra as a Tragedy. Modern Drama, 1(3), 143-150.
Bigsby, C. (2018). Forward, in D. Palmer (Ed.), Visions of Tragedy in Modern American Drama (pp. xvi-xx). Bloomsbury.
Black, S. A. (2004). ‘Mourning Becomes Electra’ as a Greek Tragedy. The Eugene O’Neill Review, 26, 166-188.
_______ (2005). ‘Mourning Becomes Electra’ at 74. The Eugene O’Neill Review, 27, 115-125.
Bloom, C. (1995). American Drama. St. Martin’s Press.
Bloom, S. F. (2014). Eugene O’Neill. In J. H. Richards and H. S. Nathans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American Drama (pp. 248-263). Oxford University Press.
Bran, G. (1999). Eugene O’Neill. In F. N. Magill (Ed.), The 20th Century O-Z: Dictionary of World Biography (pp. 2819-2823). Routledge.
Bremmer, J. N. (1997). Why Did Medea Kill Her Brother Apsyrtus? In J. J. Clauss and S. I. Johnston (Eds.), Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art (pp. 83-102). Princeton University Press.
Brietzke, Z. (2001). The Aesthetics of Failure: Dynamic Structure in the Plays of Eugene O’Neill. McFarland & Company, Inc. Publishers.
Bryer, J. R. & Hartig, M. C. (2010). The Facts on File Companion to American Drama. Facts on File, Inc.
Cao, S. (2013). The Variation Theory of Comparative Literature. Springer.
Curtius, E. R. (1983). European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages (W. R. Trask, trans.). Princeton University Press.
Diggins, J. P. (2007). Eugene O’Neill’s America: Desire under Democracy. The University of Chicago Press.
Dixon-Kennedy, M. (1998). Encyclopedia of Greco-Roman Mythology. ABC-CLIO, Inc.
Domínguez, C., Saussy, H. & Villanueva, D. (2015). Introducing Comparative Literature: New Trends and Applications. Routledge.
Dowling, R. M. (2009). Critical Companion to Eugene O’Neill: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work. Facts on File.
Dubost, T. (2019). Eugene O’Neill and the Reinvention of Theatre Aesthetics. McFarland & Company, Inc.
Edinger, E. F. (1994). The Eternal Drama: The Inner Meaning of Greek Mythology. Shambhala Publications, Inc.
Elstein, Y. & Lipsker, A. (1995). The Homogeneous Series in the Literature of the Jewish People: A Thematological Methodology. In F. Trommler (Ed.), Thematics Reconsidered: Essays in Honor of Horst S. Daemmrich (pp. 87-116). Rodopi.
Escobar, Á. (2019). Fortitudo and sapientia: A Literary Motif in Medieval Hispano-Latin Chronicles and in Spanish Epic Poetry. RILCE, 35(2), 461-77.
_______ (2018). El tópico de lugar o argumentum a loco en la épica española y en las crónicas hispanolatinas medievales. En M. Morrás (Ed.), Espacios en la Edad Media y el Renacimiento (pp. 413-424). SEMYR.
_______ (2006). El tópico literario como forma de tropo: definición y aplicación. Cuadernos de Filología Clásica: Estudios Latinos, 26, 15-24.
_______ (2000). Hacia una definición lingüística del tópico literario. Myrtia, 15, 123-160.
Euripides. (1994). Medea. In D. Kovacs (trans. & ed.). Cyclops, Alcestis, Medea (pp. 285-427). Harvard University Press.
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2004). History of European Drama and Theatre. Routledge.
Franco, C. (2014). Shameless: The Canine and the Feminine in Ancient Greece. University of California Press.
Gaycken, H. B. (1976). A Comparative Study of Topoi in Germanic and Romance Medieval Literature [PhD dissertation], The University of Tennessee.
Genette, G. (1997a). Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree (C. Newman & C. Doubinsky, trans.). University of Nebraska Press.
_______ (1997b). Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation (J. E. Lewin, trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Gómez Luque, J. A. (2018). The Literary Topos of Love Seafare: from Classical Literature to Spanish Poetry of the Golden Age [PhD dissertation], University of Cordoba.
Grafton, A., Most, G. W. & Settis, S. (2010). The Classical Tradition. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Gray, R. (2012). A History of American Literature. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Greene, T. M. (1982). The Light in Troy. Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. Yale University Press.
Gupta, T. & Mahal, R. (2014). Inheritance and Infanticide in Eugene O’Neill’s Desire Under the Elms. Research Scholar: An International Refereed e-Journal of Literary Explorations, 2(3), 196-211.
Hays, P. (1969). Biblical Perversions in Desire Under the Elms. Modern Drama, 11(4), 423-428.
Hermann, S. (2017). Reading and Interpreting the Works of Eugene O’Neill. Enslow Publishing, LLC.
Highet, G. (1951). The Classical Tradition: Greek and Roman Influences on Western Literature. Oxford University Press.
Kabatchnik, A. (2010). Blood on the Stage, 1925-1950: Milestone Plays of Crime, Mystery, and Detection: An Annotated Repertoire. The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Kidd, M. (1999). Stages of Desire: The Mythological Tradition in Classical and Contemporary Spanish Theatre. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Khare, R. R. (1998). Shakespeare, Eugene O’Neill, T.S. Eliot and the Greek Tragedy. Mittal Publications.
Laguna Mariscal, G. (2019). Ghosts of girlfriends past: development of a literary episode. In D. Romero-González, I. Muñoz-Gallarte & G. Laguna-Mariscal (Eds.), Visitors from beyond the Grave: Ghosts in World Literature (pp. 123-138). Coimbra University Press.
_______ (2014). Regalos para enamorar (munera amoris): un tópico literario de ayer y de hoy. En R. Moreno Soldevila y J. Martos (Eds.), Amor y sexo en Roma: su reflejo en la literatura (pp. 25-56). Universidad de Huelva.
_______ (2013). Eres mi padre y mi madre: tradición literaria de un tópico amatorio atribuido a Jesús en el Evangelio. En L. Roig Lanzillota e I. Muñoz Gallarte (Eds.), Liber amicorum en honor del Profesor Jesús Peláez del Rosal (pp. 207-217). Ediciones El Almendro.
_______ (2011). Riñas. En R. Moreno Soldevila (Ed.), Diccionario de motivos amatorios en la Literatura Latina: Siglos III a. C.-II d. C. (pp. 366-369). Universidad de Huelva.
_______ (1999). En tierra, en humo, en polvo, en sombra, en nada: historia de un tópico literario. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, 22, 197-213.
_______ (1994). Literatura comparada y tradición clásica: Quevedo y sus fuentes clásicas. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, 17, 283-294.
Lambropoulos, V. (2015). Eugene O’Neill’s Quest for Greek Tragedy. In K. Bosher, F. Macintosh, J. McConnell & P. Rankine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek Drama in the Americas. Oxford University Press.
Leeman, A. D. (1982). The lonely vigil. A topos in ancient literature. In J. den Boeft & A. H. M. Kessels (Eds.), Actus: Studies in honour of H. L. W. Nelson (pp. 189-201). Instituut voor Klassieke Talen.
Liapis, V. (2021). Prelude: Adapting Greek Tragedy: A Historical Perspective. In V. Liapis & A. Sidiropoulou (Eds.), Adapting Greek Tragedy: Contemporary Contexts for Ancient Texts. Cambridge University Press.
Librán Moreno, M. (2011). Muerte y amor. En R. Moreno Soldevila (Ed.), Diccionario de motivos amatorios en la Literatura Latina: Siglos III a. C.-II d. C. (pp. 287-290). Universidad de Huelva.
López Gregoris, R. (2021). Tematología. En F. García Jurado (Ed.), Diccionario Hispánico de la Tradición y Recepción Clásica (pp. 707-715). Guillermo Escolar Editor S. L.
López Martínez, M. I. (2007). El tópico literario: teoría y crítica. Arco/Libros, S. L.
_______ (1990). Tierra madre y hombre de barro: ‘topoi’ en la poesía de Vicente Aleixandre. Anuario de estudios filológicos, 13, 167-184.
Madran, C. Y. (2006). The Ambivalence of Love and Hate in Desire Under the Elms: A Psychological and Mythological Approach. The Journal of Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute, 16, 449-458.
Mahfouz, S. M. (2010). Tragic Passion, Romantic Eloquence, and Betrayal in Eugene O’Neill’s Desire Under the Elms. Studies in Literature and Language, 1(3), 1-15.
Majumdar, R. G. (2016). Laying Ella’s Ghost: Sublimation of Incestuous Love in Eugene O’Neill’s Desire under the Elms and A Moon for the Misbegotten. The Eugene O’Neill Review, 37(1), 41-56.
Maleki, N., Nazemi, Z. & Laguna Mariscal, G. (2020). The Scheme of Potiphar’s Wife: From Classical Tradition to Eugene O’Neill. Revista de Estudios Norteamericanos, 24, 113-134.
McDonald, M. (2003). The Living Art of Greek Tragedy. Indiana University Press.
McEvoy, S. (2017). Tragedy: The Basics. Routledge.
Márquez, M. Á. (2002). Tema, Motivo y Tópico. Una Propuesta Terminológica. Exemplaria, 6, 251-256.
Narey, W. (1992). Eugene O’Neill’s Attic Spirit: Desire Under the Elms. The Eugene O’Neill Review, 16(1), 49-54.
Naupert, C. (2001). La tematología comparatista: entre teoría y práctica. Arco/Libros.
Nazemi, Z. (2022). El amor no correspondido en las tragedias de Eugene O’Neill. En Actas del X Congreso Científico de investigadores en Formación de la Universidad de Córdoba: El arte de investigar (pp. 99-101). UCO Press.
Nazemi, Z. y Laguna Mariscal, G. (2022). Eugene O’Neill: la tragedia clásica en versión moderna. The Conversation (Spain), https://theconversation.com/eugene-oneill-la-tragedia-clasica-en-version-moderna-182018.
Nazemi, Z., Maleki, N. & Laguna Mariscal, G. (2022). New Insights into Literary Topoi: A Study of ‘Madness for Guilt and Remorse’. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, 45, 193-210.
Neerudu, V. (2020). Vain Hopes of the Human Race in Eugene O’Neill’s Plays. Lulu Press, Inc.
Newlands, C. E. (1997). The Metamorphosis of Ovid’s Medea. In J. J. Clauss & S. I. Johnston (Eds.), Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art (pp. 178-210). Princeton University Press.
Nugent, S. G. (2014). Passion and Progress in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. In J. T. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought (pp. 153-174). Routledge.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1994). The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton University Press.
O’Neill, E. (1988a). Desire Under the Elms. In Bogard, T. (Ed.), Complete Plays 1920-1931 (pp. 317-378). The Library of America.
_______ (1988b). Mourning Becomes Electra. In Bogard, T. (Ed.), Complete Plays 1920-1931 (pp. 877-1054). The Library of America.
Ovid. (1892). Metamorphoses (H. Magnus, ed. & trans.). Gotha.
_______ (1939). Tristia (A. Leslie Wheeler, trans.). Harvard University Press.
Piquer, A. (2020). The Ages of Phaedra: Literature and Context. In V. Salvador & A. Sampietro (Eds.), Understanding the Discourse of Aging: A Multifaceted Perspective (pp. 107-130). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Práce, B. (2012). Vertiginous Relations in Eugene O’Neill’s Desire Under the Elms & Mourning Becomes Electra [Bachelor thesis, Charles University of Prague].
Raleigh, J. H. (1989). Strindberg and O’Neill as Historical Dramatists. In M. Maufort (Ed.), Eugene O’Neill and the Emergence of American Drama (pp. 59-76). Rodopi.
Robinson, J. A. (1998). The middle plays. In M. Manheim (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Eugene O’Neill (pp. 69-81). Cambridge University Press.
Sanders, T. A. (1968). The Discovery of Drama. Scott Foresman.
Scheaffer, L. (2002). O’Neill: Son and Artist. Cooper Square Press.
Scholz, B. F. (1986). Practical Justification in Literary Scholarship. In H. Remak (Ed.), Sensus Communis: Contemporary Trends in Comparative Literature (pp. 167-181). Gunter Narr Verlag.
Seigneuret, J. C. (1988). Dictionary of Literary Themes and Motifs, Vol. 1. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Singh, B. (2016). Three Tragedies. Lulu Press, Inc.
Sinha, M. (2021). Literary Influence: A Pivotal Aspect in the Domain of Comparative Literature. PJAEE, 18(4), 5267-5272.
Thorburn, J. E. (2005). The Facts on File Companion to Classical Drama. Facts on File, Inc.
Thornton, B. C. (1997). Eros: The Myth of Ancient Greek Sexuality. Westview Press.
Törnqvist, E. (2004). Eugene O’Neill: A Playwright’s Theatre. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
Valpy, A. J. (1821). Elements of Mythology: Intended to Enable the Reader to Understand the Ancient Writers of Greece and Rome. Clarks & Raser.
Virgil. (1900). Bucolics, Aeneid, and Georgics of Vergil (J. B. Greenough, trans.). Ginn & Co.
Williams. R. (1966). Modern Tragedy. Stanford University Press.
Wong, E. (2019). The Risk Theatre Model of Tragedy: Gambling, Drama, and the Unexpected. Friesen Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zahra Nazemi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The printed and electronic editions of this Journal are edited by the University of Seville Editorial, and the source must be cited in any partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise indicated, all the contents of the electronic edition are distributed under a license of use and distribution “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” . You can view the informative version and the legal text of the license here. This fact must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The author/s retain copyright and grant the journal the first publication right, and accept it to be distributed with the Creative Commons By NC ND 4.0 licence, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal and whenever they do not make commercial use and reuse it in the same way.
- Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended, once the article has been published in the journal Philologia Hispalensis (online version), to download the corresponding PDF and disseminate it online (ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.) as it may lead to productive scientific exchanges and to a greater and faster dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2022-07-04
Published 2022-12-12
- Abstract 414
- PDF 461
- HTML (Español (España)) 63
- XML 45
