Las preguntas orales en el Parlamento Español
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2012.v26.i01.07Keywords:
parliamentary discourse, question time, interactive structure, pragmatics, evasionAbstract
Question time is an unique opportunity for the members of Parlia- ment to receive a direct answer from the government. Several factors make this discourse special: time limit, fixed structure and the fact that the question sel- dom acts as an information request. Speech acts vary according to the speaker and interactive circumstances. They point to accusation and criticism. On the other hand, the government uses evasion as a defense device.Downloads
References
Bayley, P. (2004). “The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discourse”.
P.Bayley (ed.), 1–44.
—, (2004, ed.). Cross Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam, John
Benjamins.
Borthwick, R.L., 1993. “On the floor of the house”. Parliamentary Questions,
M.Franklin-P.Norton (eds.). Oxford, Oxford University Press, 73–103.
Briz, A.- Valesco (2003). “Un sistema de unidades para el estudio del lenguaje coloquial”.
Oralia 6, 7-61.
Bull, P. y Mayer, K. (1993). “How not to answer questions in political interviews”. Political
Psychology 14 (4), 651–666.
Bull, P. (1994). “On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews”.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13 (2), 115–131.
—, (2003). The Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and Ambiguity. London,
Routledge.
Burguera, J. (2010). Gramática y pragmática de la interrogación retórica en español. Una
aplicación al debate parlamentario, Univ. Barcelona.
Chilton, P., (2002, ed). Politics as text and talk. Analytic approaches to political discourse.
Philadelphia, J.Benjamins.
—, (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. London, Routledge.
Chilton, P. y Schäffner, C. (2002) “Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse”, en P.Chilton (ed), 1-44.
Dillon, J. (1990). The Practice of Questioning. London, Routledge.
Emmertsen, S. (2007): “Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews”.
Journal of Pragmatics 39 (2007) 570–591
Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (2000). Lingüística Pragmática y Análisis del discurso. Madrid,
Arco Libros.
—, (2006). “Operadores de intensificación del adjetivo: los cuantificadores escalares”.
Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, XXIX, 35-53.
—, (2009a). “Parliamentary (im)politeness and argumentative force: “decirles, señorías,
que…(to say, sirs, to you, that…)”,.Actas del I Congreso Internacional de Estrategias
del Discurso Político /Proceedings of the I International Conference on Political Discourse
Strategies, G. Álvarez Benito, G. Fernández Díaz- I. Iñigo (eds.), Sevilla, Mergablum,
-80.
—, (2009b). “El debate entre Zapatero y_Rajoy: estudio textual e interactivo”. Tonos digital 18, www.tonosdigital.com
—, (2009c). Diccionario de conectores y operadores del español. Madrid, Arco Libros.
—,(en prensa a). “El debate Zapatero/Rajoy: estudio argumentativo”, Estudios Críticos
sobre la Comunicación, 1.
—, (en prensa b). “La aserción parlamentaria: de la modalidad al metadiscurso”, Oralia,
, e.p.
Fuentes Rodríguez, C. y E. Alcaide (2002). Mecanismos lingüísticos de la persuasión.
Madrid, Arco Libros.
Harris, S. (1991). “Evasive action: how politicians respond to questions in political interviews”. Broadcast Talk, P.Scannell (ed.), London, Sage, 76–99.
—, (2001). “Being politically impolite: extending politeness theory to adversarial political
discourse”. Discourse and Society 12 (4), 451–472.
Heritage, J. (2002). “The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile
question content”. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11), 1427–1446.
—, (2003). “Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview”. Studies in
Language and Social Interaction, P.Glenn et al. (eds.) Mahwah, NJ., Erlbaum.
Ilie, C. (1994). What else can I tell you? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts, Stockholm, Almqvist &Wiksell International.
—, (2003). “Parenthetically speaking: Parliamentary parentheticals as rhetorical strategies”. Dialogue Analysis 2000: Selected Papers from the 10th IADA Anniversary Conference, M.Bondi-S.Stati (eds.), Tübingen, Niemeyer, 253–264.
—, (2004). “Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments: a rhetoric approach”. Bayley, P. (Ed.), 45–86.
Pérez de Ayala, S. (2001). “FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs? -Politeness in
Question Time”. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 143-169
Rasiah, P. (2010). “A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary
discourse”, Journal of Pragmatics 42. 664–680.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2004): “Text and context of parliamentary debates”, en Bayley, P. (ed.),
–372.
Wilson, J. (1990). Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language.
Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The printed and electronic editions of this Journal are edited by the University of Seville Editorial, and the source must be cited in any partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise indicated, all the contents of the electronic edition are distributed under a license of use and distribution “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” . You can view the informative version and the legal text of the license here. This fact must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The author/s retain copyright and grant the journal the first publication right, and accept it to be distributed with the Creative Commons By NC ND 4.0 licence, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal and whenever they do not make commercial use and reuse it in the same way.
- Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended, once the article has been published in the journal Philologia Hispalensis (online version), to download the corresponding PDF and disseminate it online (ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.) as it may lead to productive scientific exchanges and to a greater and faster dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
- Abstract 177
- PDF (Español (España)) 76
