Sobre ficción, lenguaje, (con)ciencia y modelos de interpretación

Authors

  • Francisco J. Salguero-Lamillar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2013.v27.i02.05

Keywords:

fiction, language, argument structure, theoretical framework, abduction, presupposition, invention, simulation

Abstract

The mental abilities of first human beings arise in an evolutionary process in which their brains develop alongside their skills to represent objects and situations that do not exist. This allows them to remember past events, plan ahead for the future and replace the real references for symbols, as well as to develop argument structures in which these symbols are contextualized by grammar, acquiring meanings that go beyond the direct and sensible experience of individuals. Imagination, invention and simulation thus become the real engines of knowledge and fiction, which are necessary to attribute meaning to linguistic expressions, regardless of their relationship to reality. Science and literature are thus in the same explanatory scope that consciousness, narrative and argumentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beaver, D. 1997. “Presupposition”. En Johan van Benthem & Alice ter Meulen, Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 939–1008.

Bostrom, N. 2003. “Are you living in a computer simulation?”. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211): 243–255.

Calvin, W. & Bickerton, D. 2000. Lingua ex Machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the human brain. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. 1959. “A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior”. En Language 35 (1):

–58.

Chomsky, N. 1966. Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures.

Harvard, MA: MIT Press.

Debord, G. 1992. La société du spectacle. Paris: Gallimard. Eco, U. & Sebeok, T.A. (eds.). 1984. The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Everett, D.L. 2005. “Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã:

Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language”. Current Anthropology

: 621–646.

Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung”. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1975. Learning How to Mean, London: Edward Arnold.

Hockett, C. 1960. “The origin of speech”. Scientific American 203: 88–96.

Igoa, J.M. 2009. “Lenguaje humano y comunicación animal”. En Pellón, Ricardo (ed.).

Cognición Comparada. Madrid: UNED.

Nietzsche, F. 1886. Posthumous Fragments. En Digitale Kritische Gesamtausgabe Werke und Briefe (edición basada en el texto crítico fijado por G. Colli y M. Montinari,

Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 1967, editado por Paolo D’Iorio). Accesible en http://

www.nietzschesource.org/#eKGWB/NF-1886,7

Nietzsche, F. 1889. Götzen-Dämmerung. Leipzig: Verlag von C. G. Neumann. En

Digitale Kritische Gesamtausgabe Werke und Briefe (edición basada en el texto crítico fijado por G. Colli y M. Montinari, Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 1967, editado

por Paolo D’Iorio). Accesible en http://www.nietzschesource.org/#eKGWB/GDSprueche-4. [Traducción al español de Andrés Sánchez Pascual, Crepúsculo de los ídolos, Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1973].

Peirce, C.S. (CP). 1935–1966. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edición a cargo de C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks. 8 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard

University Press.

Peirce, C.S. 1878. “Deduction, Induction and Hypothesis”. CP 2.619–644, W 3.323–

, EP 1.186–199. [Traducción al español de J. Martín Ruiz-Werner, Deducción,

inducción e hipótesis, Buenos Aires: Aguilar, 65–90].

Piaget, J. 1923. Le Langage et la pensée chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel/Paris: Delachaux &

Niestlé.

Piaget, J. 1945. La formation du symbole chez l’enfant; imitation, jeu et reve, image et représentation. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé.

Quine, W.v. O. 1948. “On what there is”. Review of Metaphysics 2: 21–38.

Published

2013-11-15

How to Cite

Salguero-Lamillar, F. J. (2013). Sobre ficción, lenguaje, (con)ciencia y modelos de interpretación. Philologia Hispalensis, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2013.v27.i02.05

Issue

Section

Articles
Views
  • Abstract 106
  • PDF (Español (España)) 42