Constitutional perspective of the guarantees of application of Artificial Intelligence: the inescapable protection of fundamental rights

Authors

  • Jorge Castellanos Claramunt Universitat de València
  • María Dolores Montero Caro España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/IETSCIENTIA.2020.i02.06

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence has an undeniable effect on today’s society, so its study regarding its legal effects becomes necessary. And consequently, how fundamental rights are affected is of particular importance. Hence, the present paper studies the influence of algorithms in determining judicial decisions, especially from the point of view of how this issue would affect the right to effective judicial protection, recognized as a fundamental right in article 24 of the Spanish Constitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALETRAS, N., D. TSARAPATSANIS, D. PREOµIUC-PIETRO, y V. LAMPOS, “Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective”, PeerJ Computer Science Open Access, 2016. DOI 10.7717/peerj-cs.93. Disponible en: https://peerj.com/articles/cs-93.pdf

ANGWIN, J., J. LARSON, S. MATTU, y L. KIRCHNER, “Machine Bias, There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks”, ProPublica, 2016. Disponible en: https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

BOSTROM, N., y YUDKOWSKY E., “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence”, en W. RAMSEY y K. FRANKISH (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. 316-334.

CALVINHO, G., “El brocárdico iura novit curia”, Revista de derecho procesal, 1, 2009 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Homenaje al profesor Pedro Aragoneses Alonso), pp. 223-250.

CORVALÁN, J. G., “Inteligencia artificial: retos, desafíos y oportunidades – Prometea: la primera inteligencia artificial de Latinoamérica al servicio de la Justicia”, Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Curitiba, vol. 5, 1, jan./abr. 2018, pp. 295-316. DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v5i1.55334.

COTINO, L., “Derecho y garantías ante el uso público y privado de inteligencia artificial, robótica y big data”, en M. BAUZA REILLY (dir.), El derecho de las TIC en Iberoamérica, La Ley Uruguay, Uruguay, 2019.

DICK, P. K., El informe de la minoría [original: The Minority Report (1956), traducción de Carlos Gardini], Círculo de lectores, España, 2002.

FERNÁNDEZ AGIS, D., “Ética, derecho y robótica”, Revista Electrónica IUS ET SCIENTIA, vol. 6, nº 1, 2020, pp. 22-31.

FREEMAN, K., “Algorithmic Injustice: how the Wisconsin Supreme Court failed to protect due process rights in State v. Loomis”, North Caroline Journal of Law and Technology (NCJL & Tech.), vol. 18, 2016, pp. 75-106.

MARTÍNEZ GARAY, L., “Peligrosidad, algoritmos y due process: el caso State v Loomis”, Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología, 20, 2018.

McCANEY, K., Prisons turn to analytics software for parole decisions, 1 Noviembre 2013. Disponible en: https://gcn.com/articles/2013/11/01/prison-analytics-software.aspx

MILIONE, C., “El derecho a la motivación de las resoluciones judiciales en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional y el derecho a la claridad: reflexiones en torno a una deseada modernización del lenguaje jurídico”, Revista Estudios de Deusto, Vol. 63/2, 2015.

PASQUALE, F., The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorythms That Control Money and Information, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2015.

RASO, F., H. HILLIGOSS, V. KRISHNAMURTHY, C. BAVITZ, y L. KIM, “Artificial Intelligence & Human Rights: Opportunities & Risks”, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication, 2018, pp. 1-62. Disponible en: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/38021439

ROMEO CASABONA, C. M., “Riesgo, procedimientos actuariales basados en inteligencia artificial y medidas de seguridad”, Revista de Derecho, Empresa y Sociedad (REDS), 3, Julio-Diciembre 2018, pp. 39-55.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Castellanos Claramunt, J., & Montero Caro, M. D. (2020). Constitutional perspective of the guarantees of application of Artificial Intelligence: the inescapable protection of fundamental rights. IUS ET SCIENTIA, 6(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.12795/IETSCIENTIA.2020.i02.06

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): Artificial Intelligence and Law

Section

Artículos

License

Those authors being published in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain their copyright and they will guarantee to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to license recognition by Creative Commons that allows others to share such work provided it is stated the author’s name and his first publishing in IUS ET SCIENTIA.
  2. Authors may take other non-exclusive distribution license agreements version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional digital file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided it is stated the initial publication in this journal.
  3. It is allowed and encouraged that Author s disseminate their work via the Internet (e. g. institutional digital files or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and to increase citation of the published work.
Views
  • Abstract 1491
  • pdf (Español (España)) 1414