El uso de relatos personales e históricos en los parlamentos español y británico

Authors

  • Aurelia Carranza Márquez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2010.v24.i01.03

Keywords:

Political discourse, testimonies, situational-discursive context

Abstract

Political discourse is full of references to private or personal experi- ences. The current study will analyse such fact through the use of testimonies and chronicles in the debates dealing with the elaboration of the “Ley de pro- tección Integral contra la Violencia de Género” in the Spanish Parliament and the “Domestic Violence, Crime and Victim’s Bill” in the British one, both in 2004. In our study we will take into account the situational-discursive context as a stimulator or inhibitor of the use of chronicles and testimonies, as well as the implications of the strategic and functional nature of language. We main- tain that public and private discourse can functionally overlap depending on the context, which is one of the main factors of its functional nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J.L. Blas-Arroyo (2003) “ ‘Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad, señor González’: form and function of politic verbal behaviour in face-toface Spanish political debates”, Discourse & Soviety, 14(4) (2003), pp. 395-423.

D. Edwards y J. Potter, Discursive Psychology, Sage Publications, Londres, 1992.

______, “Discursive Psychology”, en A. McHoul y M. Rapley (eds.), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods, Continuum International, Londres, 2001, pp. 154-189.

N. Fairclough, Language and Power, Longman, Londres, 1999.

______, Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language, Longman, Londres, 1995.

H. P. Grice, “Logic and Conversation”, en P. Cole y J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academia Press, Nueva York, 1995, pp. 67-98.

J. Heritage, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.

A. Mchoul y M. Rapley (eds.), “How to analyse talk in institutional settings”, A Casebook of Methods, Continuum, Londres, 2001, pp. 212-235.

G. Psathas, Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Action, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1995.

E. Schegloff, “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place”, en D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction, Free Press, Glencoe, 1972.

A. Tsui, English Conversation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.

T. Van Dijk, “Discourse Semantics and Ideology”, Discourse and Society, 6(2), (1995), pp. 45-71.

______, (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Sage, Londres, Vol. 2, 1997.

______, Dominación étnica y racismo discursivo en España y América Latina, Gedisa, Barcelona,

Published

2010-11-15

How to Cite

Carranza Márquez, A. (2010). El uso de relatos personales e históricos en los parlamentos español y británico. Philologia Hispalensis, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2010.v24.i01.03

Issue

Section

Articles
Views
  • Abstract 101
  • PDF (Español (España)) 42