Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Logo Thémata

ARTÍCULOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN (ESTUDIOS)

Núm. 56

¿De qué trata la ontología? Un examen de Reinhardt Grossmann

  • Javier Cumpa
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12795/themata.2017.i56.10
Enviado
octubre 13, 2016
Publicado
2017-12-07

Resumen

Mi propósito en este escrito es examinar críticamente la ontología de Reinhardt Grossmann. Para ello, investigo en primer lugar su teoría factualista de las categorías. En segundo lugar, discuto su punto de vista fenomenológico sobre el problema de la reducción ontológica de las propiedades, así como también su planteamiento atomista lógico sobre el análisis ontológico de los particulares, las propiedades, el nexo de ejemplificación y los hechos. Por último, exploro su contribución realista al problema de los universales.

Citas

  1. Allaire, B. E., 1963, “Existence, Independence and Universals”. En Allaire, B. E. (ed.), Essays in On-tology, The Hage, Martinus Nijhoff.
  2. Aristóteles, 1963, “Categorías”. En Categories and De Interpretatione, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  3. Armstrong, D. M., 1978, Universals and Scientific Realism, 2 Vols. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  4. ––––, 2009, “Reinhardt Grossmann’s Grossmann Ontology”. En Cumpa J. & Tegtmeier, E. (eds.), Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: David M. Armstrong–Reinhardt Grossmann Metaphysical Correspondence, Ontos Verlag.
  5. Bergmann, G., 1964, Logic and Reality, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.
  6. ––––, 1967/2004, Realism: A Critique of Brentano and Meinong, Frankfurt, Ontos Verlag.
  7. Frege, G., 1960, “Function and Concept”. En P. Geach and M. Black (ed.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell.
  8. Grossmann, R, 1963, “Sensory Intuition and the Dogma of Localization”. En Allaire, B. E. (ed.), Essays in Ontology, The Hage, Martinus Nijhoff.
  9. ––––, 1965, The Structure of Mind, Madison, Northwestern University Press.
  10. ––––, 1969, Reflections on Frege’s Philosophy, Evaston, Northwestern University Press, 1969.
  11. ––––, 1973, Ontological Reduction, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
  12. ––––, 1974a, “Bergmann’s Ontology and the Principle of Acquaintance”. En Gram M. S. and Klemke E. D. (eds.), The Ontological Turn: Studies in the Philosophy of Gustav Bergmann, Iowa City, University of Iowa Press.
  13. ––––, 1974b, Meinong, London, Routledge.
  14. ––––, 1975, “Perceptual Objects, Elementary Particles, and Emergent Properties”. En Castañeda, H. N. (ed.), Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Critical Studies in Honour of Wilfrid Sellars, Bobbs–Merrill Company.
  15. ––––, 1977, “Introduction”. En K. Twardowski, On the Content and the Object of Presentations, Martinus Nijhoff.
  16. ––––, 1983, The Categorial Structure of the World, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
  17. ––––, 1984, Phenomenology & Existentialism: An Introduction, London, Rouledge.
  18. ––––, 1990, The Fourth Way: A Theory of Knowledge, Indiana University Press.
  19. ––––, 1992, The Existence of the World: An Introduction to Ontology, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  20. ––––, 2009a, “A Legacy: Gustav Bergmann”. En Cumpa J. & Tegtmeier, E. (eds.), Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: David M. Armstrong–Reinhardt Grossmann Metaphysical Correspondence, Ontos Verlag.
  21. ––––, 2009b, “On the Simplicity of Universals”. En Cumpa J. & Tegtmeier, E. (eds.), Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: David M. Armstrong–Reinhardt Grossmann Metaphysical Correspondence, Ontos Verlag.
  22. ––––, 2009c, “Objections”. En Cumpa J. & Tegtmeier, E. (eds.), Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: David M. Armstrong–Reinhardt Grossmann Metaphysical Correspondence, Ontos Verlag.
  23. ––––, 2009d, “Comments on Armstrong’s Universals: An Opinionated Introduction”. En Cumpa J. & Tegtmeier, E. (eds.), Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: David M. Armstrong–Reinhardt Grossmann Metaphysical Correspondence, Ontos Verlag.
  24. ––––, 2009e, “The Nature of Universals”. En Cumpa J. & Tegtmeier, E. (eds.), Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: David M. Armstrong–Reinhardt Grossmann Metaphysical Correspondence, Ontos Verlag.
  25. ––––, 2010, “Materialism and the New Folk Philosophy”. En Cumpa, J. (ed.), Studies in the Ontology of Reinhardt Grossmann, Ontos Verlag.
  26. Hempel, C. G. & Oppenheim, P., 1948/1953, “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”. En H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science, Appleton–Century–Crofts.
  27. Hochberg, H., 1984, “Elementarism, Independence, and Ontology”, en H. Hochberg, Logic, Ontology, and Language, München, Philosophia Verlag.
  28. ––––, 2010, “Review of Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism”. En Dialectica, Vol. 64, Nº 3.
  29. Husserl, E., 1913/1962, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Collier Books.
  30. ––––, 1970, Logical Investigations, 2 Vols., Humanity Press, Vol. I.
  31. Meinong, A., 1903/1913, “Gegenstandstheorie”. In A. Meinong, Gesammelten Abhandlungen. Band. II, Leipzig.
  32. ––––, 1968-1978, Hume Studien I, en Haller, R. (ed.) Gesamtausgabe, 7 Vols., Verlaganstalt, Vol. I.
  33. Russell, B., 1904, “Meinong’s Theory of Complexes and Assumptions”. In Mind, Vol. XIII.
  34. ––––, 1912, The Problems of Philosophy, Home University Library.
  35. ––––, 1964, The Principles of Mathematics, Norton & Company.
  36. Sellars, W., 1963, Science, Perception and Reality, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  37. Stout, G. F., 1921-1922, “The Nature of Universals and Propositions”. En Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. X.
  38. Tegtmeier, E., 1997, Zeit und Existenz: Parmenideische Meditationen, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.
  39. Wittgenstein, L., 1954, Philosophical Investigations, Oxford University Press.
  40. ––––, 1961, Notebooks: 1914–1916, Blackwell.
  41. Wolterstorff, N., 1971, “Qualities”. En Landesman, C. (ed.), The Problem of Universals, Basic books.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.