Abstract: One of the main philosophical problems of quantum mechanics is understanding in what manner Schödinger’s wave function can said to be real. In this paper I explore the ways in which the Aristotelian notion of potentiality could be used to understand the reality of the wave function, as suggested by Heisenberg in some of his writings. For this reason I sketch some of the potential complications in the interpretation of wave function while trying to develop Aristotle’s philosophy of potentiality in relation to quantum mechanics. I will also attempt to demonstrate the connections of Popper’s account of propensities with the notion of potentiality
Bitbol, M.: Schrödinger’s Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
Bohm, D.-Hiley, B. J.: The Undivided Universe. An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.
Bohr, N.: “Le postulat des quanta et le nouveau dévelppement de l’atomistique”, in: Électrons et photons. Rapports et discussions (Solvay 1927), Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1928.
Bohr, N.: La théorie atomique et la description des phénomènes. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1932.
Born, M.: Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.
Bunge, M.: “Strife about Complementarity” in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6, 1955-1956.
D’Espagnat, B.: On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006.
De Broglie, L.: “On the True Ideas Underlying Wave Mechanics” in De Broglie, L.: Heisenberg’s Uncertainties and the Probabilistic Interpretation of Wave Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990.
De Broglie, L.: The Current Interpretation of Wave Mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1964.
Diels, H.-Kranz, W.: Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Berlin, 1954.
Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.
Folse, H. J.: The Philosophy of Niels Bohr, the Framework of Complementarity. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985.
Heisenberg, W.: “The Development of the Interpretation of the Quantum Theory” in Pauli, W.: Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics. Oxford: Pergamon, 1962.
Heisenberg, W.: “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik” in Zeitschrift für Physik 43, 1927.
Heisenberg, W.: Physics and Beyond. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Heisenberg, W.: Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper Perennial, 2007.
Hendry, J.: The Creation of Quantum Mechanics and the Bohr-Pauli Dialogue. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984.
Holton, G.: Concepts and Theories in Physical Science. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
Hughes, R. I. G.: The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Harvard Univesity Press, 1989.
Jammer, M.: The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. New-York: Wiley-Interscience, 1974.
Popper, K.: “Indeterminism in Quantum Physics” in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1, 1950.
Popper, K.: A World of Propensities. Bristol: Thoemes, 1990.
Popper, K.: Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield, 1982 (1956).
Schrödinger, E.: “Conceptual Models in Physics and their Philosophical Value” in Schrödinger, E.: Science, Theory and Man. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1957.
Schrödinger, E.: “What is an Elementary Particle?” in Schrödinger, E.: Science, Theory and Man. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1957.
Schrödinger, E.: Science and Humanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.