Conventional mechanism for the protection of regional languages or languages of minorities

Authors

  • Iliana Faritovna Valiullina Ural State Law University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/IESTSCIENTIA.2020.i01.08

Keywords:

Regional languages, Languages of minorities, Conventional mechanism, Law-making, Interpretation, International control and law enforcement.

Abstract

Today the problem of protecting regional or minority languages is an urgent one. Despite the existence of numerous international acts at the universal and regional levels aimed at protecting these languages, the language rights of national, linguistic, religious minorities and speakers of regional languages are violated. This scientific article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the conventional mechanism for the protection of regional or minority languages. The article examines the characteristic features of the conventional mechanism for the protection of regional or minority languages: law-making, interpretation, international control and law enforcement. The article begins with the disclosure of the content of the concepts of regional or minority languages. some approaches to this definition are considered. I proceed to the structure of the conventional mechanism for the protection of regional or minority languages and consider each component separately. The article provides a comparison of interpretation and specification. The article focuses on the views and works of Russian lawyers and researchers in the field of theory of state and law. The article is of an interdisciplinary nature, written at the intersection of law and sociolinguistics. This article will be of interest to specialists in the field of linguistics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Iliana Faritovna Valiullina, Ural State Law University

3rd year Ph.D student of International and European Law Department

References

Ballantyne, Davidson, and McIntyre v. Canada, Communications № 359/1989 and 385/1989//UN Doc CCPR/C/47/D/359/1989 and 385/1989 Rev. 1 (1993).

European Charter for regional or minority languages. Strasbourg, November 5, 1992 / / URL:http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/rus/Treaties/Html/148.htm (Date accessed: 24.08.2018).

Explanatory Report to the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Strasbourg, 5.11.1992//URL: https://rm.coe.int/16800cb5e5 (Date accessed: 10.02.2020). General comment № 23 of the United Nations human rights Committee. A/49/40, I (1994)107.

Hague recommendations on educational rights of national minorities and explanations (1996).

Human Rights Comm., Communication № 219/1986, Guesdon v. France// CCPR/C/39/D/219/1986 (1990).

International Labour organization Convention № 169 of 27 June 1989 Concerning indigenous and tribal peoples in independent countries. Conventions and recommendations adopted by the International labour conference. 1957-1990. Vol. II. Geneva: International labour office. 1991, pp. 2193 - 2207.

J. G. A. Diergaardt (late Captain of the Rehoboth Baster Community) et al. v. Namibia. Communication № 760/1997.CCPR/C/69/d/760/1997//URL: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/session69/view760.htm (Date accessed: 12.03.2020).

Oslo Recommendations on language rights of national minorities and explanations (1998).

Report of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues on the eighteenth session (22 April–3 May 2019), E/2019/43-E/C.19/2019/10//URL: https://undocs.org/en/E/2019/43 (Date accessed: 04.03.2020).

The Resolution of Human Rights Council «Human rights and indigenous peoples: mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples».A/HRC/RES/42/20// URL: https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/RES/42/20 (Date accessed:12.03.2020).

2. Books, journals

ALEKSEEV, S.S. Mehanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom gosudarstve, pp.96-97.

ALEKSEEV, S.S. Teoriya prava, Harkov: BEK, 1994. BIRYUKOV, P. N. International law: Study guide, 2006,pp. 84.

BRAGINSKIY, M.I., VITRYANSKIY V.V.Dogovornoe pravo, Kn. 1: Obschie polozheniya. 2011, pp.137.

GAVERDOVSKIY, A.S. Implementatsiya norm mezhdunarodnogo prava. Kiev, 1980, pp. 169 -170.

HARASZTI, G. “Some fundamental problems of the law of treaties”, 1973,pp. 18,

Otv. red. M.M. Slavin, N.A. Ushakov, 1977, pp. 49.

LAZAREV, V.V. “Effektivnost pravoprimenitelnyih aktov (Voprosyi teorii)”.

Kazan: Izd- vo Kazan.un-ta, 1975, pp. 15.

LAZUTIN, L.A. “Sootnoshenie kontrolya i mer ukrepleniya doveriya v prave mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti”, Ros. yurid. Zhurn, 1995, №1, pp. 83.

LUKASHUK, I. I. Sovremennoe pravo mezhdunarodnyih dogovorov, 2004, pp. 642.

LUKYANTSEV, G. E. Mezhdunarodnyiy kontrol v oblasti prav cheloveka: tendentsii i perspektivyi, Izd-vo RUDN, 2005, pp. 33.

MAROCHKIN, S.Y. Problema effektivnosti norm mezhdunarodnogo prava. Irkutsk, 1988, pp.111.

NERSESYANTS, V. S. Problemyi obschey teorii prava i gosudarstva, 2006, pp. 451.

PAZ M. “The Tower of Babel: Human Rights and the Paradox of Language”, European Journal of International Law, Volume 25, Issue 2, May, 2014, pp.473 – 496.

PERETERSKIY, I. S. Interpretation of international treaties, 1959, pp.18-19. SOBOLEVA A. K. “Diskriminatsiya po priznaku yazyika. Vstupitelnaya statya”,

Zaschita lichnosti ot diskriminatsii: hrestomatiya: v 3 t. / A. K. Soboleva, A. G. Osipov.

– M.: RIO «Novaya yustitsiya»,2009, pp.35–159.

SUVOROVA, V. Y. “Realizatsiya norm mezhdunarodnogo prava”, Ekaterinburg. Izdatelstvo Sverdlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta,1992, pp.31.

VALEEV, R.M. Kontrol v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave: Avtoref. dis d-ra yurid. nauk. Kazan, 1999,pp.16.

VASKOVSKY, E. V. Methodology of the Civil law, pp. 88-89.

VASKOVSKIY, E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. M.: Izd. Br.Bashmakovyih, 1917.

ZALOILO, M.V., MALYUTIN N.S. “Tolkovanie i konkretizatsiya kak universalnyie formyi evolyutsii prava”, Teoriya prava, 2015. –# 4(53). – S.88.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-28

How to Cite

Valiullina, I. F. (2020). Conventional mechanism for the protection of regional languages or languages of minorities. IUS ET SCIENTIA, 6(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.12795/IESTSCIENTIA.2020.i01.08
Views
  • Abstract 151
  • PDF 312