ECJ JUDGEMENT ON 21 JANUARY 2016 (CASE-C453/14)

Authors

  • Eva Más García University Miguel Hernández

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/e-RIPS.2016.i01.11

Abstract

This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 5 of Regulation 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and the exercise of the freedom of movement enshrined in Article 45 TFEU. Does that new provision mean that, where a pensioner who resides in a Member State receives not only a pension from that State but also a pension under a pension scheme of another Member State of the European Union or of the European Economic Area (EEA), the Member State of residence is prevented from including the pension paid by the other State in the basis for calculating health insurance contributions?.

It is concluded in the sense to consider that are equivalent benefits old-age benefits provided under an occupational pension scheme of one Member State and those provided under a statutory pension scheme of another Member State.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Eva Más García, University Miguel Hernández

Abogado

Published

2016-04-07

How to Cite

Más García, E. (2016). ECJ JUDGEMENT ON 21 JANUARY 2016 (CASE-C453/14). E-International Review on Social Protection, 1(1), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.12795/e-RIPS.2016.i01.11

Issue

Section

Artículos
Views
  • Abstract 49
  • PDF (Español (España)) 64