Biobanks, new technologies and the challenges of the present and the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/IESTSCIENTIA.2024.mon.07Keywords:
Biobanks, Informationally projected corporality, Scientific and biomedical research, Artificial Intelligence, European Health Data SpaceAbstract
This study focuses on biobanks and their crucial role in the field of scientific and, in particular, biomedical research. From this perspective, it tackles the issue of informationally projected corporality, which «embodies» the genetic and health data stored in biobanks, for the purpose of defining a modern Habeas Data, capable of providing effective responses and an adequate protection in the digital and algorithmic era. From this viewpoint, the innovative legal landscape
of the European Union is analysed, placing emphasis on its global leadership in the fields of data protection, artificial intelligence and the creation of the European Health Data Space. Conclusively, this study suggests that the legal framework of the European Union may provide a valuable model for the definition of global governance for biobanks.
Downloads
References
ADEBAMOWO, C.A. et al. (2023). The promise of data science for health research in Africa. Nature Communications, 14, Article number: 6084.
ANDREWS L., y NELKIN D. (2002). Il mercato del corpo. Il commercio dei tessuti umani nell’era biotecnologica. Giuffré.
BECKER, R., et al. (2022). Secondary Use of Personal Health Data: When Is It «Further Processing» Under the GDPR, and What Are the Implications for Data Controllers?. European Journal of Health Law, disponible online: https://brill.com/view/journals/ejhl/30/2/article-p129_1.xml.
BEIT, C. (2 de agosto de 2021). Genetic surveillance: Is our most sensitive information secure?. Baylor College of Medicine. https://blogs.bcm.edu/2021/08/02/genetic-surveillance-is-our-most-sensitive-information-secure/.
BELTRÁN PEDREIRA, M.E.,y GARCÍA MANRIQUE, R. (Coord.) (2018). El cuerpo diseminado: estatuto, uso y disposición de los biomateriales humanos. Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
CAI, P., y CHEN, L. (2022). Demystifying data law in China: a unified regime of tomorrow. International Data Privacy Law, 12(2), 75-92.
CIANCIMINO, M. (2022). Circolazione «secondaria» di dati sanitari e biobanche. Nuovi paradigmi contrattuali e istanze personalistiche - Nota a Cass. 7 ottobre 2021 n. 27325, Diritto di famiglia e delle persone, Anno LI(1), 26-69.
DAS, S. (12 de noviembre de 2023). Private UK health data donated for medical research shared with insurance companies. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/12/private-uk-health-data-donated-medical-research-shared-insurance-companies.
DUCATO, R. (2020). Data protection, scientific research, and the role of information. Computer Law & Security Review, 37, Article 105412.
FRASCARELLI, C. et al. (2023). Revolutionizing Cancer Research: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Biobanking. Journal of Personal Medicine, 13(9), 1390 ss.
GARCÍA SAN JOSÉ, D. I. (2013). European Normative Framework for Biomedical Research in Human Embryos. Editorial Aranzadi.
GÓMEZ-SALVAGO SÁNCHEZ, C. (2014). Marco jurídico privado del material biológico de origen humano en la actividad investigadora. Anuario de Derecho Civil, Tomo LXVII, Fascículo I.
GRAS, A. (2009). L’homme machine ou l’homme sans essence: la tentation au coeur de progrès techno scientifique. En C. Hervé, M. Stanton Jean, P.A. Molinari, M.A. Grimaud, E. Laforêt (Coor.), L’humain, l’humanité et le progrès scientifique. Dalloz.
HAN, B-C. (2021). Infocracia. Taurus.
JUOZAPAITĖ, D, et al. (2023). The COVID-19 pandemic reveals the wide-ranging role of biobanks. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256601.
LATTANZI, R. (2011). Ricerca genetica e protezione dei dati personali. En S Canestrari, G. Ferrando, C. M. Mazzoni, S. Rodotà, S., P. Zatti, (Coord.), Trattato di Biodiritto. Il Governo del Corpo, Tomo I. Giuffré Editore, 319-350.
LENZER, J. (2006). Secret report surfaces showing that Pfizer was at fault in Nigerian drug tests. BMJ, 332(7552), 1233.
MALLAPATY, S. (2022). China expands control over genetic data used in scientific research. Nature, 605(7910), 405.
ORTEGA Y GASSET, J. (1962). «Vitalidad, alma, espíritu», Obras completas. Revista de Occidente, II, 455.
PARK, A. (9 de mayo de 2009). 10 Ideas Changing the World Right Now – Biobanks. Time. http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1884779_1884782_1884766,00.html.
RAAB, R. et al. (2023). Federated electronic health records for the European Health Data Space. Lancet Digital Health, 5, 840-847.
RIVAS, O. (5 de diciembre de 2020). Informe responsabiliza a China de apoderarse del ADN mundial. Panampost. https://panampost.com/oriana-rivas/2020/12/05/china-se-apodera-del-adn-mundial-con-intenciones-siniestras/.
RODOTÀ, S. (2012). Il diritto di avere diritti. Laterza.
SCHNEIDER, G. (2019). Disentangling health data networks a critical analysis of Articles 9(2) and 89 GDPR. International Data Privacy Law, 9(4), 253-271.
STUNTON, C., DE VRIES, J. (2020). The governance of genomic biobank research in Africa: reframing the regulatory tilt. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), 2020, 1-10.
VALDÉS,G. S. et al. (2012). Principales características de la investigación biomédica actual, en Chile. Revista Médica de Chile, 140(4), 484-492.
WARREN, S., y BRANDEIS, L.D. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220.
LI, W., y QUINN, P. (2024). The European Health Data Space: An expanded right to data portability?. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 1-13.
WESTIN, A.F. (1968). Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum.
Fuentes Normativas
Fuentes del Derecho de la Unión Europea
Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 del Parlam-ento Europeo y del Consejo de 27 de abril de 2016 relativo a la protección de las personas físicas en lo que respecta al tratamiento de datos personales y a la libre circulación de estos datos y por el que se deroga la Directiva 95/46/CE (Reglamento General de Protección de Datos).
Propuesta de Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo por el que se establecen normas armonizadas en materia de inteligencia artificial (ley de inteligencia artificial) y se modifican determinados actos legislativos de la Unión.
Propuesta de Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo sobre el Espacio Europeo de Datos Sanitarios.
Observación general del comité de derechos económicos, sociales y culturales
ONU: Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales (CESCR), Observación general núm. 25 (2020), relativa a la ciencia y los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales (artículo 15, párrafos 1 b), 2, 3 y 4, del Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales), 30 de abril de 2020, E/C.12/GC/25.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Simona Fanni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors being published in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain their copyright and they will guarantee to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to license recognition by Creative Commons that allows others to share such work provided it is stated the author’s name and his first publishing in IUS ET SCIENTIA.
- Authors may take other non-exclusive distribution license agreements version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional digital file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided it is stated the initial publication in this journal.
- It is allowed and encouraged that Author s disseminate their work via the Internet (e. g. institutional digital files or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and to increase citation of the published work.
- Abstract 211
- PDF (Español (España)) 75
- HTML (Español (España)) 33
