Análisis de la propuesta de Reglamento sobre los principios éticos para el desarrollo, el despliegue y el uso de la inteligencia artificial, la robótica y las tecnologías conexas

Autores/as

  • Guillermo Lazcoz Moratinos Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/IETSCIENTIA.2020.i02.03

Palabras clave:

Inteligencia artificial; Unión Europea; algoritmos; discriminación; supervisión humana

Resumen

On 20 October 2020, the European Parliament adopted a resolution (2020/2012(INL)) with recommendations to the Commission regarding artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, which included a legislative proposal for a Regulation on the ethical principles for the development, deployment and use of these technologies. The content of this proposal undoubtedly follows from the regulatory vision that the European Commission has maintained in documents such as the White Paper on Artificial Intelligence (COM(2020) 65 final) or the Ethical guidelines for trustworthy AI drawn up by the High-Level Expert Group on AI. Given this new legislative horizon, it is more necessary than ever to address a constructive criticism on the proposal, highlighting the possibility of reformulating its markedly soft-law character despite its location in a regulatory source of general application and directly applicable, such as regulations, or the adopted approach for certain key principles such as human supervision or discrimination.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Guillermo Lazcoz Moratinos, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)

G.I. Cátedra de Derecho y Genoma Humano

Citas

ALMADA, M., “Human Intervention in Automated Decision-Making: Toward the Construction of Contestable Systems.”, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2019, pp. 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326699

BOIX, A., “Los Algoritmos Son Reglamentos: La Necesidad de Extender Las Garantías Propias de Las Normas Reglamentarias a Los Programas Empleados Por La Administración Para La Adopción de Decisiones.”, Revista de Derecho Público: Teoría y Método, vol. 1, pp. 223–270. https://doi.org/10.37417/RPD/vol_1_2020_33

COBBE, J. y SINGH, J., “Reviewable Automated Decision-Making.”, Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 39, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105475

COMISIÓN EUROPEA (CE), “Libro Blanco sobre la inteligencia artificial - un enfoque europeo orientado a la excelencia y la confianza”, Bruselas, COM(2020) 65 final, 19 de febrero de 2020. Disponible en: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_es.pdf

DANKS, D. y LONDON, A.J., “Algorithmic Bias in Autonomous Systems.” Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, 2017, pp. 4691–4697. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3171837.3171944

DEMETZOU, K., “Data Protection Impact Assessment: A Tool for Accountability and the Unclarified Concept of ‘High Risk’ in the General Data Protection Regulation.”, Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 35, núm. 6, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105342

FISCHER, J.E., GREENHALGH, C., JIANG, W., RAMCHURN, S.D., WU, F. y RODDEN, T., “In‐the‐loop or on‐the‐loop? Interactional arrangements to support team coordination with a planning agent.”, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2017, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4082

GRUPO DE EXPERTOS DE ALTO NIVEL SOBRE IA (HLEG-AI), “Directrices éticas para una IA fiable”, Bruselas, 8 de abril de 2019. Disponible en: https://op.europa.eu/es/publication-detail/-/publication/d3988569-0434-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1

GRUPO DE TRABAJO SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DEL ARTÍCULO 29 (GT29), “Directrices Sobre Decisiones Individuales Automatizadas y Elaboración de Perfiles a Los Efectos Del Reglamento 2016/679.”, Bruselas, 2018, pp. 1-37. Disponible en: https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2019-12/wp251rev01-es.pdf

HILDEBRANT, M., “The issue of bias: the framing powers of ML”, Draft version, en Marcello Pelillo, Teresa Scantamburlo (eds.), Machine Learning and Society: Impact, Trust, Transparency, MIT Press forthcoming 2020

KISELEVA, A., “AI as a Medical Device: Is It Enough to Ensure Performance Transparency and Accountability?”, European Pharmaceutical Law Review, vol. 4, núm. 1, 2020, pp. 5-16. https://doi.org/10.21552/eplr/2020/1/4

De LAAT, P.B., “Algorithmic Decision-Making Based on Machine Learning from Big Data: Can Transparency Restore Accountability?”, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 31, núm. 4, 2018, pp. 525–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0293-z

MANN, M. y MATZNER, T., “Challenging Algorithmic Profiling: The Limits of Data Protection and Anti-Discrimination in Responding to Emergent Discrimination.”, Big Data & Society, vol. 6, núm. 2, 2019, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053951719895805

MITTELSTADT, B. 2019. “Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI.”, Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, núm. 11, 2019, pp. 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4

MITTELSTADT, B., “From Individual to Group Privacy in Big Data Analytics.”, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 30, núm. 4, 2017, pp. 475–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0253-7

De SIO, F. y Van Den HOVEN, J., “Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account.”, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 5, 2018, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00015

VEALE, M. y BINNS, R., “Fairer Machine Learning in the Real World: Mitigating Discrimination without Collecting Sensitive Data.”, Big Data & Society, vol. 4, núm. 2, 2017, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053951717743530

WACHTER, S. “Affinity Profiling and Discrimination by Association in Online Behavioural Advertising.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal, vol. 35, núm. 2, 2020, Forthcoming, pp. 1-74. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3388639

ZUIDERVEEN BORGESIUS, F.J., “Strengthening Legal Protection against Discrimination by Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence.”, The International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 24, núm. 10, 2020, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1743976

Descargas

Publicado

2020-12-30

Cómo citar

Lazcoz Moratinos, G. (2020). Análisis de la propuesta de Reglamento sobre los principios éticos para el desarrollo, el despliegue y el uso de la inteligencia artificial, la robótica y las tecnologías conexas. IUS ET SCIENTIA, 6(2), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.12795/IETSCIENTIA.2020.i02.03
Visualizaciones
  • Resumen 1125
  • pdf 686