Collective bargaining, business impasse and collective agreement after rdl 32/2021

Authors

  • José Manuel Morales Ortega Malaga University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/TPDM.mon.2022.06

Keywords:

Collective bargaining, collective agreement, balance of forces, application priority, ultra-activity, negotiation impasse, mediation, arbitration

Abstract

The modifications operated by Royal Decree Law 32/2021 in terms of collective bargaining and collective agreement have been, in quantitative terms, few. However, in qualitative terms, they have been profound, since they have been oriented, mainly, to reestablish the balance of forces between the negotiating parties, lost with the 2012 Reform; and that, among other effects, has had the vertiginous impoverishment of the working class. Although it is configured as the main objective of the 2021 Reform, it has not been the only one; For this reason, in this work, together with the analysis of the two star measures in terms of collective bargaining, the entire set of matters that, with greater or lesser technical rigor, have been affected or altered have been addressed; some of which deserve special and particular attention, such as the procedure provided for in situations of negotiating impasse. In short, a journey through this standard, in order to dissect its successes and failures in order to achieve a collective bargaining system that respects the interests and needs of all the parties involved, as well as, despite its difficulty, guarantor of their fairness and equality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beltrán De Heredia Ruíz, I., “Nueva reforma laboral 2021 (RDLey 32/2021): valoraciones críticas sobre su impacto en la negociación colectiva (prioridad aplicativa y ultraactividad)”, https://ignasibeltran.com/2022/01/11/nueva-reforma-laboral-2021-RDLey-32-2021-valoraciones-criticas-sobre-su-impacto-en-la-negociacion-colectiva-prioridad-aplicativa-y-ultraactividad/ (Fecha de consulta: 18 de enero de 2022).

Cabeza Pereiro, J., “Prioridad aplicativa de convenios y reglas transitorias”, NET21, nº 8, 2022.

Cruz Villalón, J., “Los convenios colectivos autonómicos en su relación de concurrencia con el resto de los ámbitos negociales”, NET21, nº 8, 2022.

Gordo González, L., “El retorno de la ultraactividad ilimitada: una verdadera derogación de la reforma laboral del año 2012”, Revista Labos, vol. 3, número extraordinario, 2022.

López Aniorte, Mª C., “Recentralizar la estructura de la negociación colectiva para dignificar las condiciones laborales”, NET21, nº 7, 2021.

López Aniorte, Mª C., “El papel de la negociación colectiva en la reforma laboral”, AEDTSS, 2022.

Mercader Uguina, J., “El fin de la prevalencia del convenio de empresa en materia salarial: ¿punto de llegada o de partida?”, Revista Labos, vol. 3, número extraordinario, 2022.

Ramos Quintana, M., “Salarios y negociación colectiva sectorial: el impacto de la reforma laboral de 2021”, NET21, nº 8, 2022.

Rojo Torrecilla, E., http://www.eduardorojotorrecilla.es/2022/01/estudio-de-la-reforma-laboral-de-2021-v.html (Fecha de la consulta: 18 de enero de 2022).

Vivero Serrano, J.B.,“La supresión de la prioridad aplicativa del convenio de empresa en materia salarial”, AEDTSS, 2022.

Published

2022-04-01

How to Cite

Morales Ortega, J. M. (2022). Collective bargaining, business impasse and collective agreement after rdl 32/2021. Trabajo, Persona, Derecho, Mercado, (Monográfico), 223–257. https://doi.org/10.12795/TPDM.mon.2022.06

Issue

Section

Artículos doctrinales
Received 2022-03-07
Accepted 2022-03-10
Published 2022-04-01