La Ciropedia y la Anabasis: ¿un príncipe socrático en una παμβασιλεία?
The Cyropaedia and the Anabasis: a Socratic prince in a παμβασιλεία?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2024.i57.10Palabras clave:
ἰδιώτης, liderazgo, monarquía, παμβασιλεία, politeía persa, porfirogénesis, speculum principum.Eliminar ἰδιώτης, liderazgo, monarquía, παμβασιλεία, politeía persa, porfirogénesis, speculum principumResumen
Es un lugar común en los estudios sobre la Ciropedia de Jenofonte ver en ella un tratado sobre el liderazgo político (προστάτης; ἄρχων), así como un speculum principum para la Grecia de su tiempo y de toda la tradición occidental. Menos habitual ha sido leer la Anábasis como un tratado de filosofía política, pero tampoco han faltado solventes ejercicios que ven en ella otra obra de Jenofonte sobre el liderazgo político y en ambas la figura de un príncipe socrático en una παμβασιλεία.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
Atack, C. 2018: “Cyrus Appeared both Great and Good: Xenophon and the Performativity of Kingship” en D. Allen, P. Christensen, P. Millett (eds.), How to do Things with History: New Approaches to Ancient Greece, Oxford, Oxford U.P., 109-135.
Azoulay, V. 2004: Xénophon et les grâces du pouvoir: De la charis au charisme, Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne.
-2007: “Sparte et la Cyropédie : du bon usage de l’analogie”, Ktèma 32, 435-456.
Briant, P. (ed.) 1995: Dans Les Pas des Dix-Mille : Peuples et Pays du Proche-Orient vus par un Grec, Toulousse, Toppoi.
Brown Ferrario, S. 2017: “Xenophon and Greek Political Thought”, en M. A. Flower (ed.) (2017), 57-83.
Bucci, O. 1983: “L’impero achemenide come ordinamento giuridico sovrannazionale e arta come principio ispiratore di uno <> (data)”, en: Forme di Contatto e Processi di Transformazione nelle Società anticha. Atti del Convegno di Cornona (24-30 maggio 1981), Pisa/Roma, 89-122.
Buxton, R. F. (ed.) 2016: Aspects of Leadership in Xenophon, Histos Supplement 5, Newcastle upon Tyne.
-2017: “Xenophon on Leadership: Commanders and Friends”, en M. A. Flower (ed.) (2017), 323-337.
Buzzetti, E. 2014: Xenophon the Socratic Prince. The Argument of the Anabasis of Cyrus, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Canfora, L. & Zagrebelsky, G. (2020): La máscara democrática de la oligarquía. Un diálogo al cuidado de Geminello Preterossi, Madrid, Trotta, (Roma-Bari, 2015).
Carlier, P. 1984: La royauté en Grèce avant Alexandre, Strasbourg, AECR.
-2010: “L’idée de monarchie imperial dans la Cyropédie de Xénophon”, Ktèma 3 (1978), 133-163 (= Gray (ed.) 2010, 327-366).
Christensen, A. 1936: Les gestes des rois dans les traditions de l’Iran antique, Paris, Geuthner.
Danzig, G. 2020: “The Younger Cyrus and the Alter Cyrus”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 165-69.
Degen, J. 2020: “Ancient Near Eastern Traditions in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Conceptions of Royal Qualities and Empire”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 197-228.
Delebecque, E. 1957: Essai sur la vie de Xénophon, Paris, C. Klincksieck.
Demont, P. 2014: “Remarques sur la technique du dialogue dans la Cyropédie”, en Pontier 2014, 195-209.
-2022: “Friendship (φιλία) in Xenophon’s Anabasis”, en Rood & Tamiolaki (eds.) 2022, 183-203.
Dillery, J. 1995: Xenophon and the History of his Times, London, Routledge.
Dorion, L.-A. 2002: “La responsabilité de Cyrus dans le déclin de l’empire perse selon Platon et Xenophon”, Revue Française d’Histoire des Idées Politiques 16, 369-386.
-2010: “L’exégèse strausienne de Xénophon : le cas paradigmatique des Mémorables IV 4”, Philosophie Antique 1 (2001); 87-118 (= Gray (ed.) 2010, 283-326).
-2017: “Xenophon and Greek Political Thought”, en M. A. Flower (ed.) (2017), 37-56.
-2020: “Cyrus and Socrates: Two Models on an Equal Footing?”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 47-69.
Due, B. 1989: The Cyropaedia. Xenophon’s Aims and Methods, Aarhus-Copenhagen, Aarhus U.P.
Esposito, J. E. & Sandridge, N. B. 2020: “On the Fundamental Activities of the Leader in Xenophon’ Education of Cyrus -and Wether They Even Constitute Leadership”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 105-124.
Farber, J. 1979: “The Cyropaedia and Hellenistic Kingship”, AJP 100, 497-514.
Flower, M. A. 2012: Xenophon’s Anabasis, or The Expedition of Cyrus, Oxford, Oxford U.P.
-2016: “Piety in Xenophon’s Theory of Leadership”, en Buxton (ed.) 2016, 85-119.
-(ed.) 2017, The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon, Cambridge, Cambridge U.P.
-2017: “Xenophon as a Historian” en M. A. Flower (ed.) 2017, 301-322.
-2020: “Xenophon’s Anabasis and Cyropaedia: a Tale of Two Cyruses”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 125-164.
García Sánchez; M. 2005: “La figura del sucesor del Gran Rey en la Persia aqueménida” en V. Alonso Troncoso (ed.), La figura del sucesor en la realeza helenística. Gerión Anejos, 9, 223-239.
-2009: El Gran Rey de Persia. Formas de representación de la alteridad persa en el imaginario griego, Barcelona, Edicions Universitat de Barcelona.
-2019: “¿Príncipes o tiranos?: La Ciropedia de Jenofonte, la monarquía aqueménida y los specula principum de la modernidad (siglo XVI)”, en L. Sancho; C. Fornis; M. García Sánchez (eds.), 'Politeia': los sistemas políticos griegos en la tradición y en la modernidad. Gerión, 37/2, 399-423.
-2021: “Gynaikología: O econômico de Xenofonte e Leo Strauss”, Calíope (2021.2), Ano XX, 114-135.
-2023: “Cyrus the Gentleman (καλοκἀγαθός)?: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and Leo Strauss”, DHA, 49/2 (Dec 2023), 37-58.
Gera, D. L. 1993: Xenophon s Cyropaedia: Style, Genre and Literary Technique, Oxford, Oxford U.P.
Gray, V. J. (ed.) 2010: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Xenophon, Oxford, Oxford U.P.
-2011: Xenophon’s Mirror of Princes. Reading the Reflections, New York-Oxford, Oxford U.P.
Jacobs, B. (ed.) 2020: Ancient Information on Persia Re-assessed: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia, Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz.
Harman, R. 2023: The Politics of Viewing in Xenophon’s Historical Narratives, London, Bloomsbury Academic.
Higgins, E. 1977: Xenophon the Athenian. The Problem of the Individual and the Society of the Polis, Albany, State University of New York Press.
Hirsch, S. W. 1985: The Friendship of the Barbarians. Xenophon and the Persian Empire, Hanover-London, University Press of New England.
Hutchinson, G. 2000: Xenophon and the Art of Command, London, Greenhill Books.
Keim, B. D. 2016: “Honour and the Art of Xenophontic Leadership”, en Buxton (ed.) (2016), Histos Supplement 5, 121-162.
Knauth, W. 1975: Das altiranische Fürstenideal von Xenophon bis Ferdousi, Wiesbaden, Steiner.
Lane Fox, R. (ed.) 2004: The Long March: Xenophon and the Ten Thousand, New Haven, CT, Yale U.P.
Lee, J. W. I. 2007: A Greek Army on the March: Soldiers and Survival in Xenophon’s Anabasis, Cambridge, Cambridge U.P.
Lee Too, Y. 1998: “Xehophon’s Cyropaedia: disfiguring the pedagogical state”, en Y. Lee Too, N. Livingstone (eds.), Pedagogy amd Power. Rhetorics of Classical Learning, Cambridge, Cambridge U.P., 82-302.
Llewellyn-Jones, Ll. (2013), King and Court in Ancient Persia 559 to 331 BCE, Edinburgh, Edinburgh U.P.
-(2024), Los persas. La era de los Grandes Reyes, Barcelona, Ático de los Libros (London, 2022).
Luccioni, J. 1947: Les idées politiques et sociales de Xénophon, Paris, Éditions Ophrys, 1947.
Madreiter, I. 2020: “Cyropaedia and the Greek ‘Novel’ again: History and Perspectives of Supposed Generic Relationship”, en B. Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 19-43.
Masaracchia, E. 1996: “La Ciropedia di Senofonte e l’ideologia imperiale persiana”, QUCC 54, 163-194.
Nadon, Ch. 2001: Xenophon’s Prince. Republic and Empire in the Cyropaedia, Berkeley-Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Newell, W. R. 1983: “Tyranny and the science of ruling in Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus”, Journal of Politics, 45, 889-905.
-2013: Tyranny. A New Interpretation, New York, Cambridge U.P.
Nicolai, R. 2014: “Cyrus orateur et ses maîtres (grecs)”, en Pontier (ed.) 2014, 179-194.
Nussbaum, G. B. 1967: The Ten Thousand. A Study in Social Organization and Action in Xenophon’s Anabasis, Leiden, Brill.
Ober, J. 1999: Political Dissent in Democratic Athens, Princeton, Princeton U.P.
Parker, R. 2004: “One Man’s Piety: The Religious Dimension of the Anabasis”, en Lane Fox (ed.) 2004, 131-3153.
Pontier, P. (ed.) 2014: Xénophon et la Rhétorique, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
Potts, D. T. (2023), Aspects of Kinship in Ancient Iran, Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Rood, T. 2004: “Panhellenism and Self-Representation: Xenophon’s Speeches”, en Lane Fox (ed.) 2004, 305-329.
-2006: “Advice and Advisers in Xenophon’s Anabasis”, en D. Spencer, E. Theodorakopoulos (eds.), Advice and Its Rhetoric in Greece and Rome, Bari, Levante, 47-61.
-2015: “Political Thought in Xenophon: Straussian Readings of the Anabasis”, Polis, The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 32, 143-165.
Rood, T. & Tamiolaki, M. (eds.) 2022: Xenophon’s ›Anabasis‹ and its Reception, Berlin, De Gruyter.
Ruderman, R. 1992: “The Rule of a Philosopher-King: Xenophon’s Anabasis”, en L. G. Rubin (ed.), Politikos II. Educating the Ambitious: Leadership and Political Rule in Greek Political Thougth, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. 2010: “The death of Cyrus: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia as a source for Iranian History”, Acta Iranica 25 (1985), 459-471 118 (= Gray (ed.) 2010, 439-456).
-1987: “The Fifth Oriental Monarchy and Hellenocentrism: Cyropaedia VIII viii and its Influence”, en: H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, A. Kuhrt (eds.), Achaemenid History, II, The Greek Sources. Proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid History Workshop, Leiden, Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 117-131.
Stadler, Ph. 2010: “Fictional narrative in the Cyropaideia”, AJPH 112, 461-91 (= Gray (ed.) 2010, 367-400).
Strauss, L. 1963: Lectures on Xenophon. Edited and with an introduction by Ch. Nadon en:https://leostrausscenter.uchicago.edu/course/xenophon-winter-quarter-1963, Chicago.
-1964: The City and Man, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
-1968: “Greek Historians”, Review of Metaphysics, 21/4, 656-666.
-1970: Xenophon’s socratic Discourse, Ithaca-London, Cornell University Press.
-1972: Xenophon’s Socrates, Ithaca-London, Cornell University Press.
-1975: “Xenophon’ s Anabasis”, Interpretation, 4/3, 117-147 [reimp. en Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, Chicago, 1983].
Tamiolaki, M. 2012: “Virtue and Leadership in Xenophon: Ideal Leaders or Ideal Losers?”, en Ch. Tuplin & F. Hobden (eds.), Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry, Berlin, Brill, 563-589.
-2017: “Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Tentative Answers to an Enigma”, en M. A. Flower (ed.) 2017, 174-194.
-2018: “Being or Appearing Virtuous? The Challenges of Leadership in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia”, en A. Kampakoglou, A. Novokhatko (eds.), Gaeze, Vision and Visuality in Greek Literature, Berlin, De Gruyter, 308-330.
-2020: “Straussian Readings of the Cyropaedia: Challenges and Controversies”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 367-384.
Tatum, J. 1989: Xenophon’s Imperial Fiction. On The Education of Cyrus, Princeton, Princeton U.P.
-1994: “The Education of Cyrus”, en J. R. Morgan, R. Stoneman (eds.), Greek Fiction. The Greek Novel in Context, London-New York, Routledge, 15-28.
Tourraix, A. 2021: L’empire perse, les Grecs et le politique, Besançon, Presses Universitaires de Besançon.
Tuplin, Ch. 1994: “Xenophon, Sparta, and and the Cyropaedia”, en A. Powell, S. Hodkinson (eds), The Shadow of Sparta, London, Routledge, 127-181.
-(ed.) 2004: Xenophon and His World: Papers from Conference Held in Liverpool in July 1999, Stuttgart, Steiner.
-2013: “Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Fictive History, Political Analysis and Thinking with Iranian Kings”, en L. Mitchell, Ch. Melville (eds), Every Inch a King Comparative Studies on Kings and Kingship, Leiden, Brill, 67-90.
Vlassopoulos, K. 2017: “Xenophon on Persia”, en M. A. Flower (ed) 2017, 360-375.
Waterfield, R. 2009: La retirada de Jenofonte. Grecia, Persia y el final de la Edad de Oro, Madrid, Gredos, (London 2006).
Whidden, Ch. 2007a: “The Account of Persia and Cyrus's Persian Education in Xenophon's Cyropaedia”, The Review of Politics 69, 539-567.
Whidden, Ch. 2007b: “Deception in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia”, Interpretation 34/2, 129-156.
-2008: “Cyrus’s Imperial Household: an Aristotelian Reading of Xenophon’s Cyropaedia”, Polis 25/1, 31-62.
Wood, N. 1964: “Xenophon’s Theory of Leadership”, Classica et Mediaevalia 25, 33-66.
Woronoff, M.1993: “L’autorité personelle chez Xenophon”, Ktèma 18, 41-48.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son editadas por el Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional”
. Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
- Resumen 43
- PDF 28
