La Ciropedia y la Anabasis: ¿un príncipe socrático en una παμβασιλεία?
The Cyropaedia and the Anabasis: a Socratic prince in a παμβασιλεία?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2024.i57.10Keywords:
ἰδιώτης, liderazgo, monarquía, παμβασιλεία, politeía persa, porfirogénesis, speculum principum.Eliminar ἰδιώτης, liderazgo, monarquía, παμβασιλεία, politeía persa, porfirogénesis, speculum principumAbstract
It is commonplace in studies of Xenophon's Cyropaedia to see it as a treatise on political leadership (προστάτης; ἄρχων), as well as a speculum principum for the Greece of his time and the entire Western tradition. It has been less common to read the Anabasis as a treatise on political philosophy, but there have been no shortage of solvent exercises that see in it another of Xenophon's works on political leadership and the figure of a Socratic prince in a παμβασιλεία.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Atack, C. 2018: “Cyrus Appeared both Great and Good: Xenophon and the Performativity of Kingship” en D. Allen, P. Christensen, P. Millett (eds.), How to do Things with History: New Approaches to Ancient Greece, Oxford, Oxford U.P., 109-135.
Azoulay, V. 2004: Xénophon et les grâces du pouvoir: De la charis au charisme, Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne.
-2007: “Sparte et la Cyropédie : du bon usage de l’analogie”, Ktèma 32, 435-456.
Briant, P. (ed.) 1995: Dans Les Pas des Dix-Mille : Peuples et Pays du Proche-Orient vus par un Grec, Toulousse, Toppoi.
Brown Ferrario, S. 2017: “Xenophon and Greek Political Thought”, en M. A. Flower (ed.) (2017), 57-83.
Bucci, O. 1983: “L’impero achemenide come ordinamento giuridico sovrannazionale e arta come principio ispiratore di uno <> (data)”, en: Forme di Contatto e Processi di Transformazione nelle Società anticha. Atti del Convegno di Cornona (24-30 maggio 1981), Pisa/Roma, 89-122.
Buxton, R. F. (ed.) 2016: Aspects of Leadership in Xenophon, Histos Supplement 5, Newcastle upon Tyne.
-2017: “Xenophon on Leadership: Commanders and Friends”, en M. A. Flower (ed.) (2017), 323-337.
Buzzetti, E. 2014: Xenophon the Socratic Prince. The Argument of the Anabasis of Cyrus, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Canfora, L. & Zagrebelsky, G. (2020): La máscara democrática de la oligarquía. Un diálogo al cuidado de Geminello Preterossi, Madrid, Trotta, (Roma-Bari, 2015).
Carlier, P. 1984: La royauté en Grèce avant Alexandre, Strasbourg, AECR.
-2010: “L’idée de monarchie imperial dans la Cyropédie de Xénophon”, Ktèma 3 (1978), 133-163 (= Gray (ed.) 2010, 327-366).
Christensen, A. 1936: Les gestes des rois dans les traditions de l’Iran antique, Paris, Geuthner.
Danzig, G. 2020: “The Younger Cyrus and the Alter Cyrus”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 165-69.
Degen, J. 2020: “Ancient Near Eastern Traditions in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Conceptions of Royal Qualities and Empire”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 197-228.
Delebecque, E. 1957: Essai sur la vie de Xénophon, Paris, C. Klincksieck.
Demont, P. 2014: “Remarques sur la technique du dialogue dans la Cyropédie”, en Pontier 2014, 195-209.
-2022: “Friendship (φιλία) in Xenophon’s Anabasis”, en Rood & Tamiolaki (eds.) 2022, 183-203.
Dillery, J. 1995: Xenophon and the History of his Times, London, Routledge.
Dorion, L.-A. 2002: “La responsabilité de Cyrus dans le déclin de l’empire perse selon Platon et Xenophon”, Revue Française d’Histoire des Idées Politiques 16, 369-386.
-2010: “L’exégèse strausienne de Xénophon : le cas paradigmatique des Mémorables IV 4”, Philosophie Antique 1 (2001); 87-118 (= Gray (ed.) 2010, 283-326).
-2017: “Xenophon and Greek Political Thought”, en M. A. Flower (ed.) (2017), 37-56.
-2020: “Cyrus and Socrates: Two Models on an Equal Footing?”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 47-69.
Due, B. 1989: The Cyropaedia. Xenophon’s Aims and Methods, Aarhus-Copenhagen, Aarhus U.P.
Esposito, J. E. & Sandridge, N. B. 2020: “On the Fundamental Activities of the Leader in Xenophon’ Education of Cyrus -and Wether They Even Constitute Leadership”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 105-124.
Farber, J. 1979: “The Cyropaedia and Hellenistic Kingship”, AJP 100, 497-514.
Flower, M. A. 2012: Xenophon’s Anabasis, or The Expedition of Cyrus, Oxford, Oxford U.P.
-2016: “Piety in Xenophon’s Theory of Leadership”, en Buxton (ed.) 2016, 85-119.
-(ed.) 2017, The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon, Cambridge, Cambridge U.P.
-2017: “Xenophon as a Historian” en M. A. Flower (ed.) 2017, 301-322.
-2020: “Xenophon’s Anabasis and Cyropaedia: a Tale of Two Cyruses”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 125-164.
García Sánchez; M. 2005: “La figura del sucesor del Gran Rey en la Persia aqueménida” en V. Alonso Troncoso (ed.), La figura del sucesor en la realeza helenística. Gerión Anejos, 9, 223-239.
-2009: El Gran Rey de Persia. Formas de representación de la alteridad persa en el imaginario griego, Barcelona, Edicions Universitat de Barcelona.
-2019: “¿Príncipes o tiranos?: La Ciropedia de Jenofonte, la monarquía aqueménida y los specula principum de la modernidad (siglo XVI)”, en L. Sancho; C. Fornis; M. García Sánchez (eds.), 'Politeia': los sistemas políticos griegos en la tradición y en la modernidad. Gerión, 37/2, 399-423.
-2021: “Gynaikología: O econômico de Xenofonte e Leo Strauss”, Calíope (2021.2), Ano XX, 114-135.
-2023: “Cyrus the Gentleman (καλοκἀγαθός)?: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and Leo Strauss”, DHA, 49/2 (Dec 2023), 37-58.
Gera, D. L. 1993: Xenophon s Cyropaedia: Style, Genre and Literary Technique, Oxford, Oxford U.P.
Gray, V. J. (ed.) 2010: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Xenophon, Oxford, Oxford U.P.
-2011: Xenophon’s Mirror of Princes. Reading the Reflections, New York-Oxford, Oxford U.P.
Jacobs, B. (ed.) 2020: Ancient Information on Persia Re-assessed: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia, Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz.
Harman, R. 2023: The Politics of Viewing in Xenophon’s Historical Narratives, London, Bloomsbury Academic.
Higgins, E. 1977: Xenophon the Athenian. The Problem of the Individual and the Society of the Polis, Albany, State University of New York Press.
Hirsch, S. W. 1985: The Friendship of the Barbarians. Xenophon and the Persian Empire, Hanover-London, University Press of New England.
Hutchinson, G. 2000: Xenophon and the Art of Command, London, Greenhill Books.
Keim, B. D. 2016: “Honour and the Art of Xenophontic Leadership”, en Buxton (ed.) (2016), Histos Supplement 5, 121-162.
Knauth, W. 1975: Das altiranische Fürstenideal von Xenophon bis Ferdousi, Wiesbaden, Steiner.
Lane Fox, R. (ed.) 2004: The Long March: Xenophon and the Ten Thousand, New Haven, CT, Yale U.P.
Lee, J. W. I. 2007: A Greek Army on the March: Soldiers and Survival in Xenophon’s Anabasis, Cambridge, Cambridge U.P.
Lee Too, Y. 1998: “Xehophon’s Cyropaedia: disfiguring the pedagogical state”, en Y. Lee Too, N. Livingstone (eds.), Pedagogy amd Power. Rhetorics of Classical Learning, Cambridge, Cambridge U.P., 82-302.
Llewellyn-Jones, Ll. (2013), King and Court in Ancient Persia 559 to 331 BCE, Edinburgh, Edinburgh U.P.
-(2024), Los persas. La era de los Grandes Reyes, Barcelona, Ático de los Libros (London, 2022).
Luccioni, J. 1947: Les idées politiques et sociales de Xénophon, Paris, Éditions Ophrys, 1947.
Madreiter, I. 2020: “Cyropaedia and the Greek ‘Novel’ again: History and Perspectives of Supposed Generic Relationship”, en B. Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 19-43.
Masaracchia, E. 1996: “La Ciropedia di Senofonte e l’ideologia imperiale persiana”, QUCC 54, 163-194.
Nadon, Ch. 2001: Xenophon’s Prince. Republic and Empire in the Cyropaedia, Berkeley-Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Newell, W. R. 1983: “Tyranny and the science of ruling in Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus”, Journal of Politics, 45, 889-905.
-2013: Tyranny. A New Interpretation, New York, Cambridge U.P.
Nicolai, R. 2014: “Cyrus orateur et ses maîtres (grecs)”, en Pontier (ed.) 2014, 179-194.
Nussbaum, G. B. 1967: The Ten Thousand. A Study in Social Organization and Action in Xenophon’s Anabasis, Leiden, Brill.
Ober, J. 1999: Political Dissent in Democratic Athens, Princeton, Princeton U.P.
Parker, R. 2004: “One Man’s Piety: The Religious Dimension of the Anabasis”, en Lane Fox (ed.) 2004, 131-3153.
Pontier, P. (ed.) 2014: Xénophon et la Rhétorique, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
Potts, D. T. (2023), Aspects of Kinship in Ancient Iran, Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Rood, T. 2004: “Panhellenism and Self-Representation: Xenophon’s Speeches”, en Lane Fox (ed.) 2004, 305-329.
-2006: “Advice and Advisers in Xenophon’s Anabasis”, en D. Spencer, E. Theodorakopoulos (eds.), Advice and Its Rhetoric in Greece and Rome, Bari, Levante, 47-61.
-2015: “Political Thought in Xenophon: Straussian Readings of the Anabasis”, Polis, The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 32, 143-165.
Rood, T. & Tamiolaki, M. (eds.) 2022: Xenophon’s ›Anabasis‹ and its Reception, Berlin, De Gruyter.
Ruderman, R. 1992: “The Rule of a Philosopher-King: Xenophon’s Anabasis”, en L. G. Rubin (ed.), Politikos II. Educating the Ambitious: Leadership and Political Rule in Greek Political Thougth, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. 2010: “The death of Cyrus: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia as a source for Iranian History”, Acta Iranica 25 (1985), 459-471 118 (= Gray (ed.) 2010, 439-456).
-1987: “The Fifth Oriental Monarchy and Hellenocentrism: Cyropaedia VIII viii and its Influence”, en: H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, A. Kuhrt (eds.), Achaemenid History, II, The Greek Sources. Proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid History Workshop, Leiden, Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 117-131.
Stadler, Ph. 2010: “Fictional narrative in the Cyropaideia”, AJPH 112, 461-91 (= Gray (ed.) 2010, 367-400).
Strauss, L. 1963: Lectures on Xenophon. Edited and with an introduction by Ch. Nadon en:https://leostrausscenter.uchicago.edu/course/xenophon-winter-quarter-1963, Chicago.
-1964: The City and Man, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
-1968: “Greek Historians”, Review of Metaphysics, 21/4, 656-666.
-1970: Xenophon’s socratic Discourse, Ithaca-London, Cornell University Press.
-1972: Xenophon’s Socrates, Ithaca-London, Cornell University Press.
-1975: “Xenophon’ s Anabasis”, Interpretation, 4/3, 117-147 [reimp. en Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, Chicago, 1983].
Tamiolaki, M. 2012: “Virtue and Leadership in Xenophon: Ideal Leaders or Ideal Losers?”, en Ch. Tuplin & F. Hobden (eds.), Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry, Berlin, Brill, 563-589.
-2017: “Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Tentative Answers to an Enigma”, en M. A. Flower (ed.) 2017, 174-194.
-2018: “Being or Appearing Virtuous? The Challenges of Leadership in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia”, en A. Kampakoglou, A. Novokhatko (eds.), Gaeze, Vision and Visuality in Greek Literature, Berlin, De Gruyter, 308-330.
-2020: “Straussian Readings of the Cyropaedia: Challenges and Controversies”, en Jacobs (ed.) 2020, 367-384.
Tatum, J. 1989: Xenophon’s Imperial Fiction. On The Education of Cyrus, Princeton, Princeton U.P.
-1994: “The Education of Cyrus”, en J. R. Morgan, R. Stoneman (eds.), Greek Fiction. The Greek Novel in Context, London-New York, Routledge, 15-28.
Tourraix, A. 2021: L’empire perse, les Grecs et le politique, Besançon, Presses Universitaires de Besançon.
Tuplin, Ch. 1994: “Xenophon, Sparta, and and the Cyropaedia”, en A. Powell, S. Hodkinson (eds), The Shadow of Sparta, London, Routledge, 127-181.
-(ed.) 2004: Xenophon and His World: Papers from Conference Held in Liverpool in July 1999, Stuttgart, Steiner.
-2013: “Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Fictive History, Political Analysis and Thinking with Iranian Kings”, en L. Mitchell, Ch. Melville (eds), Every Inch a King Comparative Studies on Kings and Kingship, Leiden, Brill, 67-90.
Vlassopoulos, K. 2017: “Xenophon on Persia”, en M. A. Flower (ed) 2017, 360-375.
Waterfield, R. 2009: La retirada de Jenofonte. Grecia, Persia y el final de la Edad de Oro, Madrid, Gredos, (London 2006).
Whidden, Ch. 2007a: “The Account of Persia and Cyrus's Persian Education in Xenophon's Cyropaedia”, The Review of Politics 69, 539-567.
Whidden, Ch. 2007b: “Deception in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia”, Interpretation 34/2, 129-156.
-2008: “Cyrus’s Imperial Household: an Aristotelian Reading of Xenophon’s Cyropaedia”, Polis 25/1, 31-62.
Wood, N. 1964: “Xenophon’s Theory of Leadership”, Classica et Mediaevalia 25, 33-66.
Woronoff, M.1993: “L’autorité personelle chez Xenophon”, Ktèma 18, 41-48.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son editadas por el Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional”
. Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
- Abstract 43
- PDF (Español (España)) 28
