Huizinga, tudo é “play” ou de como tudo, afinal, pode ser “falso-play”. Alguns problemas

Huizinga, everything is “play” or how everything, after all, can be “false-play”. A few problems

Autores/as

  • Paulo Antunes CEPS-Universidade do Minho (Braga)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2024.i57.04

Palabras clave:

Conflação; Cultura; Elitismo; Puerilidade; Seriedade.

Resumen

O presente artigo vai considerar alguns problemas da obra de Huizinga, Homo Ludens, onde foi proposto o fator social “play” como constante e base da civilização humana, enfim, que “tudo é play”. A crítica terá em conta alguns dos principais argumentos aí apresentados, o que resulta na análise do que se considera ser uma confusão conceptual entre “play” e “game”, ou “ludicidade” e “jogo”; uma contradição entre os próprios termos do autor aquando de uma comparação entre um suposto “play” do passado e o que entende ser o do presente; e um engagement que se co-relaciona com os dois pontos anteriores. Com este trajeto, a hipótese huizingiana de um “falso-jogo” também deve ficar esclarecida.

Descargas

Métricas

Vistas del PDF
70
Oct 10 '24Oct 13 '24Oct 16 '24Oct 19 '24Oct 22 '24Oct 25 '24Oct 28 '24Oct 31 '24Nov 01 '24Nov 04 '243.0
|

Citas

Barata-Moura, J. (1998): Estudos de Filosofia Portuguesa, Lisboa, Editorial Caminho.

Burghardt, G. M. (2005): The Genesis of Animal Play. Testing the Limits, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.

Caillois, R. (1958): Les jeux et les hommes. Le masque et le vertige, Édition revue et augmentee, Paris, Gallimard, 1992. [epub]

Carlson, C. (2011): “The ‘Playing’ Field: Attitudes, Activities, and the Conflation of Play and Games”, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 38, pp. 74-87.

DaCosta, L. P. (2014): “Sport and Ideology”, in Torres, C. R. (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to the Philosophy of Sport, London etc., Bloombury, pp. 212-227.

Deulofeu, J. (2010): National Geographic – Teoria dos Jogos: Prisioneiros com dilemas e estratégias dominantes (edição especial), Lisboa, RBA Revistas Portugal, 2018.

Duflo, C. (1997): Jouer et philosopher, Paris, PUF.

Duncan, M. C. (1988): “Play Discourse and the Rhetorical Turn: A Semiological Analysis of Homo Ludens”, Play and Culture, 1, pp. 28-42.

Eberle, S. G. (2014): “The Elements of Play. Toward a Philosophy and a Definition of Play”, Journal of Play, 6 (2), pp. 214-233.

Eco, U. (1985): “Huizinga e il gioco”, in Eco, Sugli Specchi e altri saggi, III edizione. Tascabili Bompiani, 1990, pp. 283-300.

Feezell, R. (2010): “A Pluralist Conception of Play”, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 37, pp. 147-165.

Geyl, P. (1961): “Huizinga as Accuser of His Age” [Huizinga als aanklager van zijn tijd], History and Theory, 2 (3), 1963, pp. 231-262.

Guardini, R. (1919): “Liturgy: Playful and Serious” [Vom Geist der Liturgie], in Kuehn, H. R. (sel.), The Essential Guardini. An Anthology of the Writings of Romano Guardini, Chicago, Liturgy Training Publications, 1997, pp. 147-154.

Henricks, T. S. (1988): “Huizinga’s Legacy for Sports Studies”, Sociology of Sport Journal, 5, pp. 37-49.

_____. (2006): Play Reconsidered: Sociological Perspectives on Human Expression, Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press.

_____. (2015): Play and the Human Condition, Urbana etc., University of Illinois Press.

Henriot, J. (1989): Sous couleur de jouer: la métaphore ludique, Paris, Corti.

Huang, Y.; Ryall, E. (2018): “On the relationship between philosophy and game-playing”, in Russell, W. et al. (eds.), The Philosophy of Play as Life, London/New York, Routledge, pp. 80-93.

Huizinga, J. (1919): The Waning of the Middle Ages. Study of the Forms of Life, Thought, and Art in France and the Netherlands in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries [Herfsttij der Middeleeuwen], transl. by F. Hopman, London, Penguin Books, 1990, reprinted.

_____. (1936): In the Shadow of To-morrow [A Diagnosis of the Spiritual Distempers of Our Time], transl. from the Dutch by Huizinga, New York, The Norton Library, 1964.

_____. (1938). Homo Ludens. Vom Ursprung der Kultur im Spiel, 23. Auflage, Hamburg, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 2013.

_____. (1949): Homo Ludens. A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, [transl. by R. F. C. Hull,] London etc., Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980, reprinted.

_____. (1950): Homo Ludens. Proeve Eener Bepaling Van Het Spel-element Der Cultuur, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2008.

_____. (2003): Homo Ludens. Um estudo sobre o elemento lúdico na cultura, trad. de V. Antunes, Lisboa, Edições 70.

Hurka, T. (2019): “Suits on Games: Slightly Revised, Slightly Restricted”, in Hurka (ed.), Games, Sports, and Play: Philosophical Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 13-32.

Kant, I. (1784): “Beantwortung der Frage: was ist Aufklärung? ”, in Immanuel Kant’s Sämmtliche Werke. In Chronologischer Reihenfolge, vol. 3, Leipzig, Leopold Voss, 1867, pp. 159-168.

Ketchum, A. L. (2018): “Playing in the Web. New Babylon and the Internet”, in Russell, W. et al. (eds.), The Philosophy of Play as Life, London/New York, Routledge, 2018, pp. 50-64.

Malaby, T. M. (2007): “Beyond Play. A New Approach to Games”, Games and Culture, 2, (2), April, pp. 95-113.

Michels, R. (1911): Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Transl. by Eden & Cedar Paul, New York, Hearst’s International Library Co., 1915.

Nagel, M. (1998): “Play in culture and the jargon of primordiality: A critique of Homo Ludens”, in Duncan, M. C. et al. (eds.), Play and culture studies, vol.1, Greenwich, Greenwood Publishing Group, pp. 19-29.

Nguyen, C. T. (2017): “Philosophy of games”. Philosophy Compass, 12 (8), e12426 [18 pp].

Nieuwenhuys, C. (1969): Opstand van de Homo Ludens. Een Bundel Voordrachten En Artikelen, Bussum, Paul Brand.

Pederson, C. C. (2021): Gaming Utopia. Ludic Worlds in Art, Design, and Media, Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana University Press.

Schnyder, P.; Strouhal, E. (2010): “‘Die probabilistische Revolution hat am Spieltisch begonnen’. Ein Gespräch”, in Schädler, U.; Strouhal, E. (eds.), Spiel und Bürgerlichkeit. Passagen des Spiels I, Springer, pp. 167-182.

Simmel, G. (1917): “'Die Geselligkeit (Beispiel der reinen oder formalen Soziologie)”, in Grundfragen der Soziologie (Individuum und Gesellschaft), Sammlung Göschen, Bd. 1101. 3, unveränderte Aufl., Berlin, Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1970, pp. 48-68.

Skweres, A. (2017): Homo Ludens as a Comic Character in Selected American Films, Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing.

Steiner, G. (2003): “Prefácio”, in Huizinga, Homo Ludens. Um estudo sobre o elemento lúdico na cultura, trad. de V. Antunes, Lisboa, Edições 70, pp. 7-14.

Suits, B. (1978): The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia, Canada, Broadview Press, 2005.

_____. (2017): A Cigarra Filosófica. A Vida é um Jogo?, trad. de V. Guerreiro, Lisboa, Gradiva.

Sutton-Smith, B. (1997): The Ambiguity of Play, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, Harvard University Press, 2001, 2nd printing.

Tekinbas, K. S.; Zimmerman, E. (2004): Rules of Play. Game Design Fundamentals, London, England; Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-10-08

Cómo citar

Antunes, P. (2024). Huizinga, tudo é “play” ou de como tudo, afinal, pode ser “falso-play”. Alguns problemas: Huizinga, everything is “play” or how everything, after all, can be “false-play”. A few problems. Araucaria, 26(57). https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2024.i57.04
Recibido 2023-11-06
Aceptado 2024-05-16
Publicado 2024-10-08
Visualizaciones
  • Resumen 149
  • PDF 70