El  problema eclesiológico-político del Leviatán en contexto

MARTA GARCÍA-ALONSO

doi:10.12795.05

Autores/as

MARTA GARCÍA-ALONSO Profesora titular UNED https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-0450

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795.05

Palabras clave:

Hobbes, Leviatán, eclesiología, teología política, iglesia, credo mínimo

Resumen

En este artículo nos proponemos analizar el alcance de los poderes que otorga Hobbes a la iglesia y el sentido de la absorción de las funciones eclesiales por parte del poder político. Situando las discusiones eclesiológicas en su contexto histórico, abordaremos el análisis del papel esencial que el Leviatán otorga al soberano en el edificio eclesial, no solo en sentido político, sino doctrinal. Lejos del ateísmo con que a veces se califica su pensamiento teológico-político, el soberano hobbesiano será no solo cabeza institucional de la iglesia, sino el encargado de imponer un credo doctrinal mínimo (cristiano) a nivel nacional, en aras de mantener la paz eclesial entre las diversas confesiones de su reino.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Bibliografía

Bejan, T. M., “Difference without Disagreement: Rethinking Hobbes on “Independency” and Toleration,” The Review of Politics, 78 (2016), pp. 1–25

Collins J. “Christian Ecclesiology and the Composition of Leviathan: A Newly Discovered Letter to Thomas Hobbes”, The Historical Journal, 43/ 1 (2000), pp. 217-231.

_ The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005

_ “All the Wars of Christendom: Hobbes’s Theory of Religious Conflict”, en Laurens van Apeldoorn y Robin Douglass, eds.: Hobbes on Politics and Religion, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018

Craig H., “The Geneva Bible as a Political Document”, The Pacific Historical Review, 7 (1938), pp. 40-49

Day, A.,“Hobbes’s changing Ecclesiology,” The Historical Journal, 62/4 (2019), pp. 899-919.

Dekker, E., “Was Arminius a molinist?”, Sixteenth Century Journal XVII/ 2 (1996), pp. 337-352.

Elazar, D. J., “Hobbes confronts Scripture”, Jewish Political Studies Review, 4/2 (1992), pp. 3-24.

Elisabeth’s Act of Uniformity (acceso diciembre 2020): https://history.hanover.edu/texts/engref/er80.html

Elisabeth’s Sumpremacy Act (acceso diciembre 2020): https://history.hanover.edu/texts/engref/er79.html

Erasto, T., The Theses Of Erastus Touching Excommunication, Robert Lee (ed.), London, Simpkin and Marshall and G. Bell, 1844.

Fabbri, E. Roberto Bellarmino e Thomas Hobbes. Teologie politiche a confronto, Roma, Aracne, 2009.

Hobbes, T., Behemoth, Miguel Angel Rodilla (ed.), Madrid, Tecnos, 1992.

_ Leviatán, Carlos Mellizo (ed.), Barcelona, Altaya, 1994

Kingdon R.-M. y Bergier J.-F (dirs.), Registres de la Compagnie des Pasteurs de Genève au temps de Calvin, Ginebra, Droz, Tomo primero: 1546-1553, (1964); tomo segundo: 1553-1564 (1962).

Knox J., The Order of Excommunication and of Public Repentance (1569), (acceso diciembre 2020): http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualNLs/Orde_ch2.htm

Kyle, R, G., “The Christian Commonwealth: John Knox’s Vision for Scotland,” Journal of Religious History, 16/3 (1991), pp. 247–259

_ God’s Watchman: John Knox’s Faith and Vocation, Oregon, Pickwick, 2014

Lorimer, P., John Knox and the Church of England: His Work in Her Pulpit and His Influence Upon Her Liturgy, Articles, and Parties, London, H. S. King & Company, 1875 (acceso diciembre de 2020): https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=fwMFAAAAYAAJ&hl=es&pg=GBS.PA201

Lutero, Escritos Políticos, Joaquín Abellán (ed.), Madrid, Tecnos, 1986

_ Obras de Martín Lutero, Teófanes Egido, (ed.), Salamanca, Sígueme, 2001

Malcolm, N., Aspects of Hobbes, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.

Martinich, A. P., The Two Gods of Leviathan. Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992

_ “Hobbes’s Erastianism and Interpretation”, Journal of the History of Ideas 70/1 (2009), pp. 143–63.

Morrill, J., “The Religious Context of the English Civil War”, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 34 (1984), pp 155-178.

_The Nature of the English Revolution, London-NY, Routledge, 2013.

Nauta, L., “Hobbes on Religion and the Church between ‘The Elements of Law’ and ‘Leviathan’: A Dramatic Change of Direction?”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 63/4, (2002), pp. 577-98.

Olsthoorn J., “The Theocratic Leviathan Hobbes’s Arguments for the Identity of Church and State” en Laurens van Apeldoorn and Robin Douglass, eds.: Hobbes on Politics and Religion Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 10-28

Outhwaite R. y Helmholz, R., The Rise and Fall of the English Ecclesiastical Courts, 1500–1860. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007

Pangle, T.L., “Thomas Hobbes Confronts the Bible,” Jewish Political Studies Review, 4/2, (1992), pp. 25-57.

Roy, T., The Civil War: The War of Three Kingdoms 1638-1660, London, Abacus, 2004.

Skinner, Q., The Fondations of Modern Political Thought II: The Age of Reformation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1978

Stanford, R. W., “John Knox's Theology of Political Government,” The Sixteenth Century Journal, 19/ 4 (1988), pp. 529-540

Thirty-Nine Articles Act (acceso diciembre 2020): https://history.hanover.edu/texts/ENGref/er83.html

Thomson, A., “Church Discipline: The Operation of the Winchester Consistory Court in the Seventeenth Century” History, 91(2006), pp. 337–359

Tuck, R. “The Civil Religion of Thomas Hobbes”, en N. Phillipson y Q. Skinner, eds.: Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 120–138

_ “The Christian Atheism of Thomas Hobbes”, en Michael Hunter, David Wootton, eds: Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment, Oxford, Clarendon Press,1993, pp.111–130.

_ “Hobbes, Conscience, and Christianity”, en A. P. Martinich and Kinch Hoekstra, eds: The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 481–500

Witte, J., Law and Protestantism. The Legal Teachings of the Lutheran Reformation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002