Diminutives as heads or specifiers: the mapping between syntax and phonology


  • Antonio Fábregas Universitetet i Tromsø


diminutives, specifiers, multiple spell out, phonology-syntax mapping


This article provides evidence for an analysis where the properties of lexical exponents are determined by the position they occupy in the structure and the configuration they establish with other items. It is argued that cross-linguistically and inter-linguistically, an item that can be introduced as a head or as a specifier displays syntactic, semantic and phonological properties that can be fully accounted for in the config- uration. The study concentrates on the case of diminutives in Spanish, German and Czech. We show, through different tests, that diminutives can be introduced as heads, in which case they form a Command Unit with the noun or adjective with which they combine, and can therefore change the semantic and grammatical properties of that base and phonologically integrate with it. In other cases they are introduced as spec- ifier, so that when phrasal movement of the base takes place they belong to different Command Units; in such cases they do not select for the base, they do not change its semantic or grammatical properties and they are not phonologically integrated with it. We argue that this account is superior to an analysis that uses any procedure where single lexical items are associated with sets of arbitrarily related properties.


Download data is not yet available.


Alexiadou, Artemis & Kirsten Gengel. 2011. Classifiers as morphosyntactic licensors of NP ellipsis: English vs. Romance. Proceedings of NELS 39, 15-28.

Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically-conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 1-42.

Arad, Maya. 2003. Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, 737-778.

Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded Phonology. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

Arregi, Karlos. 2003. Focus on Basque Movements. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge (Mass.): MIT.

Baker, Carl L. & Michael K. Brame. 1972. Global rules: a rejoinder. Language 48, 51- 75.

Baker, Mark. 2002. Lexical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2007. Morphological structure and phonological domains in Spanish denominal derivation. In Fernando Martínez-Gil & Sonia Colina (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic Studies in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 278-311.

Booij, Geert. 2000. Morphology and Phonology. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 335-344.

Borer, Hagit. 2005. In Name Only. Vol. 1 of the Exoskeletal Trilogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bradley, Travis G. & Jason Smith. 2011. The Phonology-Morphology Interface in Judeo-Spanish Diminutive Formation: A Lexical Ordering and Subcategorization

Approach. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4, 247-300.

Cabré, Teresa & María Ohannesian. 2009. Stem boundary and stress effects on syllab- ification in Spanish. In Marina Vigário, Sónia Frotas & M. Joâo Freitas (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology: Interactions and Interrelations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 159-180.

Caha, Pavel & Tobias Scheer. 2007. Syntax and phonology of Czech templatic morphology. Handout presented at Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16, Stony Brook, May 2007. Available at [17/06/2013]

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 1-49.

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 1-52.

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104-131.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 239-298.

Colina, Sonia. 2003. Diminutives in Spanish: a morpho-phonological account. South-west Journal of Linguistics 22, 45-88.

Crowhurst, Megan. 1992. Diminutives and augmentatives in Mexican Spanish: a prosodic analysis. Phonology 9, 231-253.

Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eguren, Luis. 2001. Evaluative suffixation in Spanish and the syntax of derivational processes. In Julia Herschensohn, Enrique Mallén & Karen Zagona (eds.), Features and Interfaces in Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 71-85.

Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement Operations after Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 555-595.

Fábregas, Antonio. 2012. Integrating desinences in the (syntactic) analysis of event nouns. SinSpeC 9, 17-39.

Fábregas, Antonio & Sergio Scalise. 2012. Morphology: From Data to Theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Gallego, Ángel. 2010. Phase Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gallego, Ángel. 2012. Introduction: A framework of phases for linguistic theory. In Ángel Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 9-45.

Giegerich, Heinz. 1999. Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harris, James W. 1983. Syllable Structure and Stress in Spanish. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

Inkelas, Sharon. 1998. The morphological status of phonologically conditioned phonology: a case study of dominance effects. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1997. Dordrecht: Springer, 121-155.

Îto, Junko & Armin Mester. 1995. The Core-Periphery Structure of the Lexicon and Constraints on Reranking. In Jill Beckman, Susan Urbanczyk & L. Walsh (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics [UMOP] 18: Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: Umass, 181-209.

Jablonska, P. 2007. Radical Decomposition and Argument Structure . PhD Dissertation, University of Tromsø.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jaeggli, Oswaldo. 1978. Spanish diminutives. In F. H. Nuessel (ed.), Contemporary studies in Romance Languages. Blomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 142-155.

Jakobson, Roman. 1949. The phonemic and grammatical aspects of language in their interrelation. In Roman Jakobson. 1971. Selected Writings, vol. 2, Word and Language. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, 103-114.

Kaisse, Ellen M. 1983. The syntax of auxiliary reduction in English. Language 59, 93-122.

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical Phonology and Morphology. In In-Seok Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 3-91.

Krämer, Martin. 2001. Yucatec Maya vowel alternation - Harmony as syntagmatic identity. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 20, 175-217.

Kučera, Henry. 1961. The Phonology of Czech. ’S-Gravenhage: Mouton. Lapointe, Steven. 1981. A Theory of Grammatical Agreement, Ph.D. Dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

Lázaro Mora, Fernando. 1999. La derivación apreciativa. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, 4645-4683.

Lightfoot, David. 1976. Trace theory and twice-moved NPs. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 559-582.

Lloret, María-Rosa. 1996. Els diminutius i les marques de gènere. In Teresa Cabré, Lídia Pons, Joaquím Rafel, Joan Veny & Joaquím Vilaplana (eds.), Estudis de lingüística i filologia oferts a Antoni M. Badia Margarit III. Barcelona: Departament de Filologia Catalana de la Universitat de Barcelona & Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat, 63-76.

Mahanta, Shakuntala. 2008. Local vs. non-local consonant intervention in vowel har- mony. Proceedings of ConSOLE XIV, 165-188.

Morén, Bruce. 2001. Distinctiveness, Coercion and Sonority. A Unified Theory of Weight. New York/London: Routledge.

Náñez, Emilio. 1973. El diminutivo: historia y funciones en el español clásico y moderno. Madrid: Gredos.

Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1982. Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations. Dordrecht: Foris, 225-265.

Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. Norrmann-Vigil, Ingrid. 2012. Accounting for variation of diminutive formation in Porteño Spanish. Mester 41, 99-122.

Orgun, Orhan. 1996. Sign-based Morphology and Phonology with Special Attention to Optimality Theory. Ph.D. Dissertation. Berkeley: University of California-Berkeley.

Parrott, Jeffrey. 2006. Distributed morphological mechanisms of Pronoun-Case Variation. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 1-13.

Pater, Joe. 2006. The locus of exceptionality. Morpheme specific phonology as constraint indexation. In Leah Bateman, Michael O’Keefe, Ehren Reilly & Adam Werle (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory III. Amherst: GSLA, 1-37.

Picallo, Carme. 2007. On Gender and Number. Lingue e Linguaggio 1, 47-66.

Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Prieto, Pilar. 1992. Morphophonology of the Spanish Diminutive Formation: A case for prosodic sensitivity. Hispanic Linguistics 5, 169-205.

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.

Scheer, Tobias. 2003. The key to Czech vowel length: Templates. In Petr Kosta, Joanna Blaszczak, Jens Frasek, Ljudmila Geist & Marzena Zygis (eds.), Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 97-118.

Scheer, Tobias. 2008. Spell out your sister! In Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, 379-387.

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1972. The Phrase Phonology of English and French. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT.

Selkirk, Elisabeth & Tong Shen. 1990. Prosodic domains in Shanghai Chinese. In Sharon Inkelas & Draga Zec (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 313-337.

Toscano Mateus, Humberto. 1953. El español hablado en el Ecuador. Anejo 61 of the Revista de Filología Española. Madrid: Gredos.

Uffman, Christian. 2006. Epenthetic vowel quality in loanwords: empirical and formal issues. Lingua 116, 1079-1111.

Uriagereka, Juan. 2002. Multiple spell out. In Juan Uriagereka, Derivations: Exploring the Dynamics of Syntax. London and New York: Routledge, 45-66.

Wagner, Michael. 2005. Prosody and Recursion. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT.

Wiltschko, Martina. 2006. Why should diminutives count? In Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 669-679.

Zec, Draga & Sharon Inkelas. 1990. Prosodically constrained syntax. In Sharon Inkelas & Draga Zec (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 365-378.

Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.


How to Cite

Fábregas A. (2014). Diminutives as heads or specifiers: the mapping between syntax and phonology. IBERIA: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 5(1), 1–44. Retrieved from https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/iberia/article/view/214



  • Abstract 646
  • PDF 159