The (Un)available. From Heideggerian technique to the contradiction of Modernity in Hartmut Rosa

Main Article Content

Patrizia Pedraza
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-6710

Abstract

Since the second half of the last century, intellectual productions in relation to the question of modern technification have been increasing; technique and the forms of social alienation have been the object of study of thinkers from the most diverse disciplines. One of the first figures to undertake this enterprise was Martin Heidegger, from hermeneutic phenomenology, while one of the most recent theorizations in this regard comes from the phenomenological critical sociology of Hartmut Rosa. In this paper, we will start from both of them to think about the problem of availability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pedraza, P. (2024). The (Un)available. From Heideggerian technique to the contradiction of Modernity in Hartmut Rosa. Differenz. Revista Internacional De Estudios Heideggerianos Y Sus Derivas contemporáneas, (10), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.12795/Differenz.2024.i10.03 (Original work published July 26, 2024)
Section
Estudios
Views
  • Abstract 154
  • PDF (Español (España)) 0

References

Gros, A. “¿Una teoría crítica fenomenológica? Resonancia, alienación y crítica de la sociedad en el pensamiento de Hartmut Rosa”. Argumentos. Revista de Crítica Social, 22, 2020, pp. 485-519.

Heidegger, M. Caminos de Bosque. Tr. H. Cortés y A. Leyte. Madrid: Alianza, 1995.

Heidegger, M. Conferencias y Artículos. Tr. E. Barjau. Barcelona: Serbal, 1994.

Heidegger, M. Interpretaciones Fenomenológicas sobre Aristóteles. Tr. J. Adrián Escudero. Madrid:Trotta, 2002.

Heidegger, M. Serenidad. Tr. Y. Zimmermann, Barcelona: Del Serbal, 1989.

Rosa, H. Lo Indisponible. Tr. A. Gros. Barcelona: Herder Editorial, 2020.

Segura, C. “Heidegger en torno a Aristóteles. Una mirada fenomenológico-hermenéutica”. Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 20.2, 2015, pp. 231-249.