The sciencie of the eíde. The onto-logical structure of «to say the being» as both epistemological condition and menace of metaphysics.

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Jul 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/Differenz.2017.i03.02
Keywords:
Eîdos, ente particular, ente universal, estructura onto-lógica, distancia metafísica Eidos, particular being, universal being, onto-logical structure, metaphisical distance

Main Article Content

Miguel Ángel Bueno Espinosa
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Abstract

The existence of universal essences has being a constant problem along occidental metafisic´s history. We do recognize their epistemological need, but we doubt about their metafisical truth. However, it is possible that the origin of the problem lies in the use of an access method absolutely inappropiate to their nature. In this paper we pretend to delve in the nature of universaly beings, in order to adequately understand their characteristics, their relation to particular beings, and, mainly, the formal category of their existence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bueno Espinosa, M. Ángel. (2017). The sciencie of the eíde. The onto-logical structure of «to say the being» as both epistemological condition and menace of metaphysics. Differenz. Revista Internacional De Estudios Heideggerianos Y Sus Derivas contemporáneas, (3), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.12795/Differenz.2017.i03.02
Issue
No. 3 (2017)
Section
Estudios
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors retain ownership of copyright and reproduction rights.

Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) after the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work.

Views
  • Abstract 165
  • PDF (Español (España)) 45

References

Aristóteles (2008): Metafísica, Madrid, Editorial Gredos, trad. Tomás Calvo Martínez.

Aristóteles (1995): Física, Madrid, Editorial Gredos, trad. Guillermo R. de Echandía.

Berkeley, G. (1982): Tratado sobre los principios del conocimiento humano, Madrid, Editorial Gredos, trad. Concha Cogolludo Mansilla.

Descartes, R. (2005): Meditaciones metafísicas con objeciones y respuestas, Oviedo, KRK Ediciones, trad. Vidal Peña.

Hume, D. (2005): Tratado de la naturaleza humana, Madrid, Editorial Tecnos, trad. Félix Duque.

Locke, J. (1982): Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, trad. Edmundo O´Gorman.

Marzoa, F. M. (1996): Ser y diálogo, Madrid, Ediciones Istmo.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2000): Fenomenología de la percepción, Barcelona, Editorial Península, trad. Jem Cabanes.

Platón (2000): Diálogos IV. República, Madrid, Editorial Gredos, trad. Conrado Eggers Lan.

Sellars, W. (1997): Empiricism and the philosophy of mind, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.