The Limits of Care in Heidegger: Self-Interest and The WellBeing of the World
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper seeks to establish the limits in Heidegger’s account of how human beings are with one another in the world. Toward this end, we will examine Heidegger’s finding that human beings exist in the world as care, as a finite movement that needs to seek the perseverance and growth of its being. We will be brought to find that, in Heidegger’s thought, this finite movement is essentially worldly and holistic, and that this means that the essential formal structure of human relations is that of reciprocity. The form and limit of such relations of reciprocity will be pursued by examining Heidegger’s account of how these relations are lived in inauthentic and authentic ways. In the case of the former, we will find that human relations abide by a logic of tit-for-tat. In the latter case, however, such relations of reciprocity will be seen to open onto and foster the growth of the wellbeing of the world as a whole. In closing, we will ask whether Heidegger’s account of our finite movement in the world can accommodate relations of non-reciprocity.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain ownership of copyright and reproduction rights.
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) after the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work.
- Abstract 112
- PDF (Español (España)) 45
References
Backman, Jussi. 2005. “Divine and mortal motivation: On the movement of life in Aristotle and Heidegger”. Continental Philosophy Review 38: 241-261.
Carter, Joseph P. 2014. “Heidegger’s Sein-zum-Tode as Radicalization of Aristotles’s definition of Kinêsis”. Epoché: A journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3): 473-502.
Heidegger, Martin. 1995. Aristotle’s Metaphysics 1-3: On the essence and actuality of Force. Trans. W. Brogan and P. Warnek. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1982. The basic problems of Phenomenology. Trans. A. Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Trans J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Heidegger, Martin. 1999. Ontology: The hermeneutics of facticity. Trans. J. Van Buren. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 2005. Introduction to phenomenological research. Trans. D. O. Dahlstrom. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 2001. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Introduction into phenomenological research. Trans. R. Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
McMullin, Irene. 2013. Time and the shared world: Heidegger on social relations. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Olafson, Frederick A. 1998. Heidegger and the ground of ethics: A study of Mitsein. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Webb, David. 2009. Heidegger, ethics and the practice of ontology. New York: Continuum.