Comment on Montesquieu's Posthumous works. Milano: Bompiani, 2017, 2668 pp.
Abstract
At first glance a work focused on Posthumous works of Montesquieu might seem to be an old fashioned pursuit. Philosophy has come widely under attack from various viewpoints, throughout the world. Moreover, this dominant perspective seems to become always more natural for one part of the population in some countries. For instance, we think about the statements of the president of Brazil Jair Bolsonaro and his policy of cuts in the funding for universities; we have in mind the articles of the financial journalist Stefano Feltri whereby Philosophy would be useless2 or certain declarations of the Italian Minister of Interior Matteo Salvini3 . In 2015, the Minister Hakuban Shimomura encouraged an anti-humanistic policy in Japan4 . Fortunately, there are also exceptions like the president of Ireland Michael D. Higgins who recently drew attention to the importance of PhilosophyDownloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
2020-05-05
Come citare
Bonfiglioli, R. (2020). Comment on Montesquieu’s Posthumous works. Milano: Bompiani, 2017, 2668 pp. Araucaria, 22(43). Recuperato da https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/araucaria/article/view/11836
Fascicolo
Sezione
Reseñas y debates
Licenza
Las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son editadas por el Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional”

