The anguish and the pre-occupied
Main Article Content
Abstract
Non-authenticity or everyday indifference, inauthenticity, authenticity are various configurations of our relationship with being. The difficulty lies in holding “me” entirely responsible for an appropriation of the meaning of being. Is it Dasein that summons me to itself? Under what circumstances? The different ways of relating to the meaning of being allow for a dynamic and complex metamorphosis that starts from an average way of being, in which we go along, neither well nor badly, we are like everyone else in general and no one else in particular, and we can go on to experience self-appropriation, the authentic resolution of meaning, as well as total loss and alienation. It was important for us to analyze the situations in which we experience forms of emptiness, interruptions to the agenda. What do we do with downtime, when we can’t do anything, or even with lost days? And when the flow that connects us to life comes again, where does it pull us from? The enabler comes from the future. From there reverberates a cadence with a tone that opens us up to the possible.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain ownership of copyright and reproduction rights.
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) after the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work.
- Abstract 42
- PDF (Español (España)) 229
References
Caeiro, A. de C. “O Acesso a Outrem Como Si No Seu Aí”. Didaskalia, Vol. 38, n. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 227-256.
Caeiro, A. de C.. Um Dia Não São Dias. Lisboa: Abysmo, 2015.
Caeiro, A. de C.. “Paradoxes of emotional life: Second-order emotions”. Philosophies, 7.5.
Chrostowska, S. D. “Consumed by Nostalgia?”. SubStance, 39.2, 2010, pp. 52-70.
Colapietro, V. “Experiments in Self-Interruption: A Defining Activity of Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Other Erotic Practices”. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 30.2, 2016, pp. 128-143.
Davis, B.P. “Pragmatic Interruption: Habits, Environments, Ethics.” William James Studies, 15.2, 2019, pp. 26-50.
Fisher, C.D. “Effects of External and Internal Interruptions on Boredom at Work: Two Studies.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19.5, 1998, pp. 503-522.
Heidegger, M. GA 6.2: Nietzsche II. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1997.
Heidegger, M. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1986.
Heidegger, M. GA 20: Prolegomena zur Geschichte des zeitbegriffs. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1994.
Heidegger, M. GA 21: Logik: Die frage nach der Wahrheit. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1995.
Heidegger, M. GA 52: Hölderlins Hymne “Andenken”. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. 1982.
von Herrmann, F.-W. von. Hermeneutische Phänomenologie Des Daseins. Ein Kommentar zu “Sein und Zeit” II “Erster Abschnitt: Die vorbereitende Fundamentalanalyse des Daseins” §9-§27. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2005.
Jett, Q.R.; George, J.M. “Work Interrupted: A Closer Look at the Role of Interruptions in Organizational Life.” The Academy of Management Review, 28.3, 2003, pp. 494-507.
Lahad, K. “Taking a Break.” A Table for One: A Critical Reading of Singlehood, Gender and Time, Manchester University Press, 2017, pp. 81-93.
Löfgren, O.; Ehn, B. “Daydreaming Between Dusk and Dawn.” Etnofoor, 20.2, 2007, pp. 9-21.
Pindari carmina cum fragmentis (Maehler, H. (post Snell, B.). Leipzig: Teubner, 1971.
Schor, R. “Going Home: The Everyday as a Space for (Dis-)Connection in Arthur Schnitzler’s Liebelei”. Austrian Studies, 27, 2019, pp. 58-73.
Singer, Jerome L. “Daydreaming and the Stream of Thought: Daydreams Have Usually Been Associated with Idleness and Inattentiveness. Now, However, through an Empirical Research Program, Their General Function and Adaptive Possibilities Are Being Elucidated.” American Scientist, 62.4, 1974, pp. 417-425.
Theunissen, M. Der Andere. Berlim: De Gruyter. 1965.