Facticity, afectivity and intentionality: the «New Heidegger’s» hermeneutical hypothesis.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present a hermeneutical approach to affectivity in the context of the so called young Heidegger’s hermeneutical transformation of phenomenology. This hypothesis is confronted to the “New Husserl’s” interpretation of self-affection in genetic phenomenology. Furthermore, this confrontation takes place against the background of the naturalizing phenomenology debate and the new paradigm introduced by affective sciences in the core of cognitive sciences.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain ownership of copyright and reproduction rights.
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) after the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work.
- Abstract 132
- PDF (Español (España)) 60
References
Adrián Escudero, J. (2012): «Husserl y la neurofenomenología» en Investigaciones fenomenológicas, 9, pp. 173-194.
Adrián Escudero, J. (2013): «Husserl, Heidegger y el problema de la reflexión» en
Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 46, pp. 47-75.
Colombetti, G. (2014): The Feeling Body. Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.
Damasio, A. (1995): Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.
Damasio, A. (2003): Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Orlando: Hancourt.
Heidegger, M. (1999): Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie, Gesamtausgabe, Band 56/57. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1993): Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (1919/20), Gesamtausgabe, Band 58. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1998): Ontologie. Hermeneutik der Faktizität, Gesamtausgabe, Band 63. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Husserl, E.: Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewuβtsein, Husserliana X. Dordrecht, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966.
Husserl, E. (1987): «Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft» en Aufsätze und Vorträge
(1911-1921), Husserliana XXV. Dordrecht, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 3-67.
Osswald, A. M. (2014): «Afección y mundo en los Manuscritos–C de Edmund Husserl» en Revista de Filosofía, 39, pp. 101-119.
Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B. y Roy J.-M. (1999): Naturalizing Phenomenology. Issues in Contemporary and Cognitive Science. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Ratcliffe, M. (2010): «The Phenomenology and Neurobiology of Moods and Emotions» en Gallagher, S. y Schmicking, D. (eds.): Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Dordrecht, New York, Heidelberg, London: Springer, pp. 123-140.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. y Rosch, E. (1991): The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Welton, D. (2001): The Other Husserl: The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Welton, D. (ed.) (2003): The New Husserl. A Critical Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2003): «Inner Time-Consciousness and Pre-reflective Self-awareness» en Welton, D. (ed.): The New Husserl. A Critical Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 157-180.
Zahavi, D. (2003): «Husserl’s Intersubjective Transformation of Transcendental Philosophy» en Welton, D. (ed.): The New Husserl. A Critical Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 233-251.
Zahavi, D. (2003): «How to investigate subjectivity: Natorp and Heidegger on reflection» en Continental Philosophy Review, 36, pp. 155-176.