Platonic dialogue as dramatic phenomenology: an exercise of application throught a comparative reading of the initial situations of Eutidemo, Menón and Menexeno.

Main Article Content

Joan González Guardiola
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9675-4832

Abstract

In the present work we try to advance and deepen an adequate understanding of the expression “dramatic phenomenology”, as used by Stanley Rosen in his interpretative studies of Plato’s work. Through a reading of the beginnings of three Platonic dialogues (Euthydemus, Meno and Menexenus) we will see how the choice of the form-dialogue forces us to question the selection of moments that the historical reception has tended to consider as philosophically Significant, by contrast to those considered as “merely literary” or scenic. A proper understanding of the concept of “dramatic phenomenology” absolutely precludes a strong distinction between these two moments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
González Guardiola, J. (2017). Platonic dialogue as dramatic phenomenology: an exercise of application throught a comparative reading of the initial situations of Eutidemo, Menón and Menexeno. Differenz. Revista Internacional De Estudios Heideggerianos Y Sus Derivas contemporáneas, (3), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.12795/Differenz.2017.i03.05
Section
Estudios
Views
  • Abstract 185
  • PDF (Español (España)) 62

References

Canto-Sperber, Monique: L´ intrigue philosophique. Essai sur l´ Euthydème de Platon, S.E. Les Belles Lettres, 1987, París.

Collins, Susan; Stauffer, Devin: “The Challenge of Plato’s Menexenus”, The Review of Politics, Vol. 61, nº 1, University of Notre Dame, 1999, pp. 85 – 115, Indiana.

Findlay J. N.: Plato. The Written and Unwritten Doctrines. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974, New York.

Friedländer, Paul: Platon Band I/II, Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1964, Berlín.

Geniusas, Saulius: “The Origins of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology,” Contributions to Phenomenology, nº 67, Springer, 2012, Dordrecht.

González, Francisco J. (ed.): The Third Way. New directions in Platonic Studies. Rowman & Littlefield Ed., 1995, New York.

González Guardiola, Joan: “Qüestió del “què” i qüestió del “qui” en l’ “Eutidem” platònic”, Anuari de la Societat Catalana de Filosofia, vol. IX, pp. 27 – 37, 1997, Barcelona.

Lebenswelt, Anuari de la Societat Catalana de Filosofia, vol. XXIII, pp. 155 – 169, 2012, Barcelona.

Guthrie, W.K. C: Historia de la filosofía griega, vol. IV, Ed. Gredos, 1990, Madrid.

Heidegger, Martin: Wegmarken, Gesamtausgabe Band IX, Vittorio Klostermann, 1976, Frankfurt am Main.

Husserl, Edmund: Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschafen und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, Hua VI, (ed. Walter Biemel), Martinus Nijhoff, 1976, La Haya.

Kahn, Charles H.: “Plato’s Funeral Oration: The Motive of the Menexenus”, Classical Philology, Vol. 58, nº 4, The University of Chicago Press, Oct. 1963, pp, 220 – 234, Chicago.

Pappas, Nickolas; zelCeR, Mark: Politics and Philosophy in Plato’s Menexenus, Routledge, 2015, New York.

Rosen, Stanley: Plato’s Sophist. The Drama of Original & Image, Yale Univ. Press, 1983, Yale.

Sales, Jordi: Estudis sobre l´ensenyament platònic I. Figures i desplaçaments. Ed. Anthropos, 1992, Barcelona.

Sales, Jordi: Estudis sobre l´ensenyament platònic II. A la flama del vi. Barcelonesa d’Edicions., 1996, Barcelona.

Scolnicov, Samuel: Plato’s Metaphysics of Education, Routledge, 1988, New York. szlezák, Thomas A.: Leer a Platón, Alianza Universidad, 1997, Madrid.

Strauss, Leo: Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, The University of Chicago Press, 1983, Chicago.

Walton, Roberto: Intencionalidad y horizonticidad, Editorial Aula de Humanidades, Universidad San Buenaventura Cali, 2015, Bogotá.