The possibility for a practical view of ethics: Husserl and Heidegger on the philosophy of law

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Jul 2, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/Differenz.2018.i04.04
Keywords:
Ley, intencionalidad, posibilidad, necesidad, ética Law, intentionality, possibility, necessity, ethics

Main Article Content

Manuela Massa
Martin-Luther-University Halle (Saale)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-3979

Abstract

This contribution centres on the practical view of ethics and its connection with the philosophy of law as it is portrayed in the works of Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger. According to these two philosophers, ethics determines both the expectations for human behaviour, as well as their obligations to society. In carrying out this analysis, I consider the function of law and then its regulated function among individuals and the state. Thus, I show how the individual’s orientation in the context of society makes an ethical statement, determined by humans’ actions throughout their existence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Massa, M. (2018). The possibility for a practical view of ethics: Husserl and Heidegger on the philosophy of law. Differenz. Revista Internacional De Estudios Heideggerianos Y Sus Derivas contemporáneas, (4), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.12795/Differenz.2018.i04.04
Issue
No. 4 (2018)
Section
Estudios
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors retain ownership of copyright and reproduction rights.

Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal websites) after the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and to a wider and faster dissemination of the published work.

Views
  • Abstract 104
  • PDF (Español (España)) 44

References

Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. The Concept of Law. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978, 4

Fassó, Guido. Il diritto naturale. Torino: Ed. Eri, 1964, 9.

Agnes, Wulff, Die Existenziale Schuld. Der fundamentalontologische Schuldbegriff Martin Heideggers und seine Bedeutung für das Strafrecht.Berlin: Lit, 2008,6.

Kaufmann, Matthias. Recht. Berlin: De Grutyer, 2016, 92.

Heidegger, Martin. Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie, GA18, 35.

Perrin, Christophe, and Brogan, Walter A. “From Metaphysics to the Juridical: Heidegger and the Question of Law.” Epoché 19, no. 1 (2014): 87-101.

Heidegger, M. Being and Time, GA2, 282.

Schumann, Karl, Husserls Staatphilosophie, Freiburg/München: Alber, 1988, 28.

Hobbes, Thomas. Thomas Hobbes’ Abhandlung über den Bürger. Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1873.

Rolin, Jan. “Der Ursprung des Staates: Die Naturrechtlich-rechtsphilosophische Legitimation von Staat und Staatsgewalt im Deutschland des 18. Und 19. Jahrhunderts”. Grundlagen Der Rechtswissenschaft 4. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005, 20. 22.

Husserl, E. und Melle, Ullrich (ed). Vorlesungen über Ethik Und Wertlehre 1908-1914. Husserliana 28. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988, 27.

Sordini, A. “Il problema della giustizia. Dike e Gerechtigkeit”, in Fenomenologia e società, 1988, 39.

Heidegger, Martin. Introduction to Metaphysics. Nota Bene Books. New Haven (Conn.): Yale University, 2000, 212. 27 Ibidem, 140.

Heidegger, Martin, and Schüssler, Ingeborg. Der Spruch Des Anaximander. Frankfurt Am Main: Klostermann, 2010, 182.

Heidegger, M. Nietzsche. New York (N.Y.): Harper and Row, 1979, 166.

Heidegger, Martin and Rojcewicz, Richard (ed). The Beginnings of Western Philosophy: Interpretations of Anaximander and Parmenides. Studies in Continental Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2015, 123.

Melle, Ullrich. “The Development of Husserl’s Ethics”. Etudes Phénoménologiques 7, no. 13 (1991): 115.

Philipse, Herman. “Heidegger and ethics.” Inquiry 42.3-4 (1999): 439.

Husserl, E. and Melle, Ullrich. Vorlesungen über Ethik Und Wertlehre 1908-1914. Husserliana 28. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988, 267.

Husserl, E. and Peucker, Henning. Einleitung in Die Ethik : Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1920 Und 1924. Husserliana 37. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004, 163.

Cf. Husserl, E. and Melle, Ullrich. Vorlesungen über Ethik Und Wertlehre 1908-1914. Husserliana 28. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988, 295.

Melle, Ullrich. “Husserl’s Personalist Ethics.” Husserl Studies 23, no. 1 (2007): 4.

Husserl, Edmund, Nenon, Thomas, and Sepp, Hans Rainer. Aufsätze Und Vorträge 1922-1937. Husserliana 27. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989, 20.

Heidegger, Martin. Platon: Sophistes, GA19, 178.

Heidegger, Martin. Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie, GA18, 161. 48 Cf. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time, GA2, 294

Irlenborn, Bernd. Der Ingrimm Des Aufruhrs: Heidegger Und Das Problem des Bösen. Passagen Philosophie. Wien: Passagen, 2000, 79.

Heidegger, M. Being and Time, 332. 51 Kuhn, Ann. Das Wertproblem in Den Frühwerken Martin Heideggers Und Sein Und Zeit. S.l: S.n., 1968, 117.

Heidegger, M. Being and Time, 334.

Heidegger, M. Nietzsche, GA6, 92.

Heidegger, Martin. Introduction to Metaphysics. Nota Bene Books. New Haven (Conn.): Yale University, 2000, 175.

Heinemann, Walter. Die Relevanz Der Philosophie Martin Heideggers Für Das Rechtsdenken. S.l: S.n., 1970, 227.

Heidegger Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, GA3, 197.

Heinemann, Walter. Die Relevanz Der Philosophie Martin Heideggers Für Das Rechtsdenken. S.l: S.n., 1970, 229.