Mutual Recognition in Paul Ricoeur’s Philosophical Project: Action and Compromise in a Political Context

Main Article Content

Thalyta Cristine Arrais Furtado Araújo de Oliveira
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3521-5644

Abstract

This article reflects on mutual recognition in Paul Ricoeur's philosophy from a political scope, developing through capabilities and under the sign of the capable person, the disposition to a shared life that does not exclude conflicts, but calls for a hermeneutic exercise. We start from the understanding that in the orthogonal structure of politics a equilibrium and a critical barrier between struggles and states of peace are required. This equilibrium is declared under the figure of compromise, where mutuality finds its maximum expression: it recognizes differences and pluralism and transcends particular interests and desires in favor of fair, but never absolute, solutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Arrais Furtado Araújo de Oliveira, T. C. (2026). Mutual Recognition in Paul Ricoeur’s Philosophical Project: Action and Compromise in a Political Context. Differenz. Revista Internacional De Estudios Heideggerianos Y Sus Derivas contemporáneas, (12), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.12795/Differenz.2026.i12.02
Section
Dossier: Hermenéutica

References

Ballet, J. & Mahieu, F.-R. (2009). Capabilité et capacité dans le développement: repenser la question du sujet dans l’œuvre d’Amartya Sen. Revue Tiers Monde, 198 (2): 303-316.

Bertram, G.W. & Celikates, R. (2015). Towards a conflict theory of recognition: On the constitution of relations of recognition in conflict. European Journal of Philosophy, 23 (4): 838-861. DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12016.

Boltanski, L. (2000). El amor y la justicia como competencias: tres ensayos sobre sociología de la acción. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Erasmo, V. (2021). Rights, Capabilities and Recognition: an alternative reading of Amartya Sen and Paul Ricoeur’s “dialogue”. Critical Hermeneutics, 5 (2): 247-276.

Kunnath, A.M.S. (2009). De l’homme faillible à l’homme de la reconnaissance: une relecture de l’anthropologie herméneutique de Paul Ricœur. [Tese de Doutorado. Poitiers].

Leydet, D. (2018). Pluralisme et compromis. Somabe, K.K. (Ed.). Compromis et pluralisme démocratique: de la construction du commun dans la diversité. Paris: L’Harmattan:81-106.

Nachi, M. (2005). Esquisse d’une théorie du compromis. Nachi, M. & deNanteuil, M. (Eds.). Éloge du compromis. Pour une nouvelle pratique démocratique. Academia-Bruylant: Louvain-la-Neuve, 145-174.

Picavet, E. (2021). Dialogue, compromis et philosophie sociale. Diogène: Revue internationale des sciences humaines, 275276 (3), 143-156.

Ricoeur, P. (1968). História e Verdade. Tr. F.A. Ribeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.

Ricoeur, P. (1984). Fondements de l’éthique. Autres temps, 3 (1), 61-71.

Ricoeur, P. (1986). Ipséité/altérité/socialité. Archivio di Filosofia (Intersoggettività, socialità, religione), 54. 17-33.

Ricoeur, P. (1989). A fragilidade da linguagem política. Revista Signo y Pensamiento, 8 (15), 33-43.

Ricoeur, P. (1991). O si-mesmo como um outro. Tr. L. Moreira César. Campinas: Papirus.

Ricoeur, P. (1993). Morale, éthique et politique. Pouvoirs: Revue française d’etudes constitutionnelles et politiques, 65, 5-17.

Ricoeur, P.; Azouvi, F & deLaunay, M.B. (1995). La critique et la conviction: Entretien avec François Azouvi et Marc de Launay. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

Ricoeur, P. (2005). Devenir capable, être reconnu. Revue Esprit, 7, 125-129.

Ricoeur, P. (2006a). Percurso do reconhecimento. Tr. N.N. Campanário. São Paulo: Loyola.

Ricoeur, P. (2006b). Capabilities and Rights. Déneulin, S.; Nebel, M. & Sagovsky, N. (Eds.), Transforming Unjust Structures. The Capability Approach. Berlin: Springer, 17-26.

Ricoeur, P. (2008). O justo. São Paulo:Martins Fontes.

Ricoeur, P. (2017). Philosophie, éthique et politique. Entretiens et dialogues. Paris: Seuil.

Scott-Baumann, A. (2013). Ricoeur and the Negation of Happiness. London: Bloomsbury.

Sen, A. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Thévenot, L. & Boltanski, L. (1991). De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.

Tholen, B. (2022). Holding It All Together: on the Value of Compromise and the Virtues of Compromising. Hum Stud, 45, 493–508.